Many authors have suggested adapting treatment programs to the specific needs of sexual abusers. However, little research has been conducted to understand what these patients seek in therapy or what elements play a key role in keeping them in treatment. In this pilot study, fifteen (N = 15) pedophile sexual abusers from La Macaza clinic for sexual abusers were interviewed. Plan analysis was used to investigate the most prevalent components involved in staying in or leaving therapy. Results suggest that many components involved in the plans leading to doing and to avoiding treatment were similar. Differences were found in regards to the outcome of confrontations with the therapists, a tendency to isolate and overcomply, guilt related to the abuse, a need for a stable environment, and a need to be accepted. These results are discussed along with possible ways to improve the patients’ involvement in treatment.
Abel, G. G., Mittelman, M., Becker, J. V., & Rathner, J. (1988). Predicting child molesters’ response to treatment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 223-234.
2.
Aubut, J., Proulx, J., Lamoureux, B., & McKibben, A. (1998). Sexual offenders’ treatment program of the Philippe Pinel Institute of Montréal. In W. L. Marshall (Ed.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 126-148). New York: Plenum.
3.
Balier, C. (1996). Psychanalyse des comportements sexuels violents [Psychoanalysis of violent sexual behavior]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4.
Caspar, F. (1995). Plan analysis: Toward optimizing psychotherapy. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
5.
Caspar, F. (1997). Plan analysis. In T. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (pp. 235-249). New York: Guilford.
6.
Chaffin, M. (1994). Research in action. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 224-237.
7.
Chorn, R., & Parekh, A. (1997). Adolescent sexual offenders: A self-psychological perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(2), 210-228.
8.
Connolly Gibbons, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., de la Cruz, C., Barber, J. P., Siqueland, L., & Gladis, M. (2003). Pretreatment expectations, interpersonal functioning, and symptoms in the prediction of the therapeutic alliance across supportive-expressive psychotherapy and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 13(1), 59-76.
9.
Deslauriers, J. P. (1987). Les méthodes de la recherche qualitative [Methods of qualitative research]. Sillery, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
10.
Drapeau, M., Körner, A., Beretta, V., & de Roten, Y. (2004). Child abusers: Denial, and those other defense mechanisms we tend to forget. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
Drapeau, M., Körner, A. C., & Brunet, L. (2004). When the goals of therapists and patients clash: A study of pedophiles in treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38(3), 69-80.
12.
Earls, C. M. (1997). Étudesur la récidive [A studyof recidivism]. Bulletind’ informationde la Clinique La Macaza, 2(1), 1-2.
13.
Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 169-194.
14.
Hunter, J. A., & Figueredo, A. J. (1999). Factors associated with treatment compliance in a population of juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(1), 49-67.
15.
Kandel, L. (1972). Réflexions sur l’usage de l’entretien, notamment non directif, et sur les études d’opinion [Comments on interviewing, non-directive interviews and surveys]. Épistémologie Sociologique, 13, 25-46.
16.
L’Écuyer, R. (1987).L’analyse de contenu: Notionet étapes [Content analysis: Theory and method].In J. P. Deslauriers (Ed.), Les méthodes de la recherche qualitative (pp. 26-43). Montreal, Canada: Presses de l’ Université du Québec.
17.
Lee, J. K. P., Proeve, M. J., Lancaster, M., Jackson, H. J., Pattison, P., & Mullen, P. E. (1996). An evaluation and a 1-year follow-up study of a community-based treatment program for sex offenders. Australian Psychologist, 31(2), 147-152.
18.
Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offenders’ recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28-54.
19.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. Washington, DC: Falmer.
20.
Murphy, C. M., & Baxter, V. A. (1997). Motivating batterers to change in the treatment context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 607-619.
21.
Perry, J. C. (1990). The Defense Manual Rating Scale. Unpublished manual, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA.
22.
Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1996). Cognitive therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
23.
Schneider, K. J. (1999). Multiple-case depth research: Bringing experience-near closer. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 1531-1540.
24.
Serin, R. (2001). Improving program performance among offenders. Forum on Corrections Research, 13(1), 24-26.
25.
Van der Maren, J. M. (1997). La recherche qualitative peut-elle être rigoureuse? [Can qualitative research be rigourous?]. Recherches Qualitatives, 17, 80-89.
26.
Waddington, L. (2002). The therapy relationship in cognitive therapy: A review. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30(2), 179-192.
27.
Weiss, J. (1993). How psychotherapy works: Process and technique. New York: Guilford.
28.
Wierzbicki, M., & Pekarik, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of psychotherapy drop-out. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 190-195.
