Teen Courts are an effective judicial alternative for many youth offenders. The majority of youth courts deal solely with first-time offenders. However, repeat offenders are at a greater risk for future crime. Is Teen Court effective with more experienced offenders? In this study, the authors examine the outcomes of 26 Whatcom County Teen Court offenders with at least one prior conviction. The sentence completion rate was higher and the recidivism was lower for the Teen Court offenders when compared with a sample of first-time Court Diversion offenders. This objective evidence of program success is augmented by an offender’s perspective on his or her court experience. These perspectives as well as the continued voluntary involvement with Teen Court are discussed in relation to empowerment theory.
Acker, J. R., Hendrix, P. N., Hogan, L., & Kordzek, A. (2001). Building a better youth court. Law & Policy, 23, 197-215.
2.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3.
Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 26-29.
4.
Bazemore, G. (2001). Young people, trouble, and crime: Restorative justice as a normative theory of informal social control and social support. Youth & Society, 33, 199-226.
5.
Bazemore, G., & Maloney, D. (1994). Rehabilitating community service: Toward restorative service sanctions in a balanced justice system. Community Service Federal Probation, March, 24-35.
6.
Berndt, T. (1996). Adolescent friends not always a bad influence. Brief report. American Psychological Association Monitor, 27, 16-17.
7.
Butts, J., & Buck, J. (2000). Teen Courts: A focus on research. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, October, 1-15.
8.
Butts, J., Buck, J., & Coggeshall, M. (2002). The impact of Teen Court on young offenders. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
9.
Chinman, M. J., & Linney, J. A. (1998). Toward a model of adolescent empowerment: Theoretical and empirical evidence. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 393-413.
10.
David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (2000). Do positive self-perceptions have a “dark side”? Examination of the link between perceptual bias and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 327-337.
11.
Forgays, D. K. (2001). Executive summary of the Whatcom County Teen Court Program. Olympia, WA: Governor’s Juvenile Justice Advisory Council.
12.
Fox, J. W., Minor, K., & Pelkey, W. L. (1994). The relationship between law-related education diversion and juvenile offenders’ social- and self-perceptions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 61-77.
13.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perception of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115.
14.
Godwin, T. (2001). The role of restorative justice in Teen Courts: A preliminary look. Lexington, KY: National Youth Court Center.
15.
Greenwood, P. (1996). Responding to juvenile crime: Lessons learned. The future of Children, 6, 75-85.
16.
Harrison, P., Maupin, J. R., & Mays, G. L. (2001). Teen Court: An examination of the processes and outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 243-264.
17.
Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver Press.
18.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Light, R. J. Louis, et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation (pp. 83-126). New York: Russell Sage.
20.
Maloney, D., & Holcomb, D. (2001). In pursuit of community justice. Youth& Society, 33, 296-313.
21.
Maloney, D., Romig, D., & Armstrong, T. (1988). The balanced approach in practice. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 39, 13-19.
22.
Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 267-277.
23.
Minor, K. I., Wells, J. B., Soderstrom, I. R., Bingham, R., & Williamson, D. (1999). Sentence completion and recidivism among juveniles referred to Teen Court. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 467-480.
24.
National Youth Court Center. (2002). Youth court stats. Retrieved February 4, 2003, from http://www.youthcourt.net
25.
Peterson-Badali, M., Ruck, M. D., & Koegl, C. J. (2001). Youth court dispositions: Perceptions of Canadian juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 593-605.
26.
Presser, L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2002). Values and evaluation: Assessing processes and outcomes of restorative justice programs. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 162-188.
27.
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.ncjrs.org/hml/ojjdp/nationalreport99
28.
Umbreit, M. (1993). Juvenile offenders meet their victims. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 31, 90-100.
