Arena, M. P., & Arrigo, B. A. (in press). Media images, mental health law, and justice: A constitutive response to the “competency” of Theodore Kacyznski. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Psychological jurisprudence: Critical explorations in law, crime, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Arrigo, B. A. (2001). Transcarceration: A constitutive ethnography of mentally ill offenders. The Prison Journal, 81, 162-186.
3.
Arrigo, B. A. (2002a). The critical perspective in psychological jurisprudence: Theoretical advances and epistemological assumptions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 151-172.
4.
Arrigo, B. A. (2002b). Punishing the mentally ill: A critical analysis of law and psychiatry. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
Arrigo, B. A. (2003a). Justice and the deconstruction of psychological jurisprudence: the case of competency to stand trial. Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal, 7, 55-88.
6.
Arrigo, B. A. (2003b). Psychologyand the law: The critical agenda for citizen justice and radical social change. Justice Quarterly, 20, 399-444.
7.
Arrigo, B. A. (in press-a). Criminal behavior: A systems approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Arrigo, B. A. (Ed.). (in press-b). Psychological jurisprudence: Critical explorations in law, crime, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
Arrigo, B. A., & Williams, C. R. (1999). Law, ideology, and critical inquiry: The case of treatment refusal for incompetent prisoners awaiting execution. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25, 367-412.
10.
Fox, D. R. (2001). A critical-psychology approach to law’s legitimacy. Legal Studies Forum, 25, 519-538.
11.
Haney, C. (1993). Psychology and legal change: The impact of a decade. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 371-398.
12.
McCubbin, M., & Weisstub, D. (1998). Toward a pure interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21, 1-30.
13.
Noll, D. E. (2003). Restorative justice: Outlining a new direction for forensic psychology. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 5-24.
14.
Ogloff, J. R. P. (2000). Presidential address to the American Psychology - Law Society. Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 457-483.
15.
Roesch, R. (1995). Creating change in the legal system: Contributions from community psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 325-343.
16.
Vitello, C. J. (2003). Stalking laws, therapeutic jurisprudence, and peacemaking criminology: A radical law-psychology inquiry. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 1-38.
17.
Walters, G. (1999). Crime and chaos: Applying nonlinear dynamic principles to problems in criminology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(2), 134-153.
18.
Williams, C. R. (1998). The abrogation of subjectivity in the psychiatric courtroom: Toward a psychoanalytic semiotic analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 11, 181-192.
19.
Williams, C. R. (in press). Anarchic insurgencies: The mythos of authority and the violence of mental health. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Psychological jurisprudence: Critical explorations in law, crime, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
Williams, C. R., & Arrigo, B. A. (2002). Law, psychology, and justice: Chaos theory and the new (dis)order. Albany: State University of New York Press.
