This study investigated whether perceptions of criminal psychological profiles are influenced by the identity of the profile’s author. Police officers were given a profile they were told was written by either a professional profiler or by an unspecified author. When judged in relation to the actual perpetrator of the crime, police officers tended to perceive greater accuracy in a profile when it was labeled as authored by a professional profiler independent of the actual content of the profile. But officers’ judgments of the usefulness of the profile were not affected by knowledge of who wrote the profile. Explanations for this result focus on the ambiguous nature of criminal profiles and how this ambiguity enhances the likelihood that beliefs about the validity of profiling can color perceptions of the content of the profile.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, P. (2001). Offender profiling and crime analysis. London: Willan.
2.
Britton, P. (1997). The jigsaw man. London: Bantam.
3.
Chan, J. B. L. (1996). Changing police culture. British Journal of Criminology, 36(1), 109-134.
4.
Chan, J. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing a multicultural society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Copson, G. (1995). Coals to Newcastle: A study of offender profiling. Police Research Group, Special Interest Series. London: British Home Office.
6.
DeMaria, W. (1999). Deadly disclosures. Adelaide, Australia: Wakefield.
Dickson, D. H., & Kelly, I. W. (1985). The Barnum effect in personality assessment: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 57, 367-382.
9.
Douglas, J. E., & Oleshaker, M. (1996). Mindhunter. London: Heineman.
10.
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.
11.
Finnane, M. (1995). From police force to police service? Aspects of the recent history of the New South Wales Police. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the Wood Royal Commission in the New South Wales Police Service.
12.
Fitzgerald, R. (1989). Report of a commission of inquiry pursuant to orders in council: Commission of inquiry into possible illegal activities and associated police misconduct. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government Press.
13.
Jackson, J. L., Van Koppen, P. J., & Hebrink, C. M. (1993). Does the service meet the needs? An evaluation of consumer satisfaction with the specific profile analysis and investigative advice as offered by the scientific research advisory unit of the National Criminal Intelligence Division (CRI) (NISCALEReportNSCR 93-05). Amsterdam: Netherlands Institute for the Study of Criminality.
14.
Jeffers, H. P. (1991). Who killed precious? How FBI special agents combine psychology and high technology to identify violent criminals. New York: Pharos Books.
15.
Johnson, J. T., Cain, L. M., Falke, T. L., Hayman, J., & Perillo, E. (1985). The Barnum effect revisted: Cognitive and motivational factors in the acceptance of personality descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1378-1391.
16.
Kocsis, R. N. (2003). An empirical assessment of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(1), 38-47.
17.
Kocsis, R. N., Hayes, A. F., & Irwin, H. J. (2002). Investigative experience and accuracy in psychological profiling of a violent crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 811-823.
18.
Kocsis, R. N., Irwin, H. J., Hayes, A. F., & Nunn, R. (2000). Expertise in psychological profiling: A comparative assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 311-331.
19.
Lusher, R. (1981). Report of the commission of inquiry into the New South Wales Police administration. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Government Printer.
20.
Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle blowing at work: Tough choices in exposing fraud, waste and abuse on the job. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Oleson, J. C. (1996). Psychological profiling: Does it actually work? Forensic Update, 46, 11-14.
22.
Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome process study. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215-233.
23.
Ressler, R. K., & Shachtman, T. (1992). Whoever fights monsters. London: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Snyder, C. R., & Newburg, C. L. (1981). The Barnum effect in a group setting. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 622-629.
25.
Stevens, J. A. (1997). Standard investigatory tools and offender profiling. In J. L. Jackson & D. A. Berkerian (Eds.), Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice (pp. 71-92), Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26.
U.S. House of Representatives. (1990). U.S.S. Iowa tragedy: An investigative failure. Report of the investigations subcommittee and the defense policy panel of the committee on armed services. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Van Zandt, C. R., & Ether, S. E. (1994). The real science of the lambs. The Police Chief, 4, 45-52.
28.
Wilson, P. R., & Chappell, D. (1996). Australian policing: Contemporary issues (2nd ed.) Sydney, Australia: Butterworths.
29.
Wilson, P. R., Lincoln, R., & Kocsis, R. N. (1997). Validity, utility and ethics of psychological profiling for serial violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 4, 1-12.
30.
Wilson, P. R., & Western, J. S. (1972). The policemans position today and tomorrow. Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
31.
Wood, J. R. T. (1997). Royal commission into the New South Wales Police Service: Final report. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Government Printer.
