Concurrent Cross-Validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A Tool for Assessing Violent and Nonviolent Recidivism and Institutional Adjustment on a Sample of North Carolina Offenders

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ), a tool that was found to be reliable and valid for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment for Canadian offenders, would also be valid for the same purposes with a demographically different population of North Carolina offenders. The internal consistency alphas and SAQ total and subscale scores’ correlations were high. Offenders with high SAQ total scores had significantly more violent offenses, had more total number of past offenses, had higher numbers of past arrests, and had more institutional infractions than those with low SAQ scores. There were no significant differences between the responses of the African American and Caucasian offenders on the SAQ scales. These results support previous findings regarding the reliability and validity of the SAQ for assessing recidivism and institutional adjustment and suggest that the SAQ could be used with diverse populations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews, D. A.,& Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised.Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct(2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Bonta, J. (1997). Predicting adult offender recidivism. Research Summary, 2. Ottawa, Canada: Corrections Research and Development, Solicitor General Canada.

Edens, J. F. (2001). Misuses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in court: Two case examples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1082-1093.

Edens, J. F., Petrila, J. D.,& Buffington-Vollum, J. (2001). Psychopathy and the death penalty: Can the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised identify offenders who represent “a continuing threat to society”? Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 433-481.

Gendreau, P., Little, T.,& Goggin, C. (1996). Ameta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 401-433.

Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of the procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7-16.

Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised.Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 741-747.

10.

Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.

11.

Kroner, D.,& Loza, W. (2001). Evidence for the efficacy of self-report in predicting violent and nonviolent criminal recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 168-177.

12.

Loza, W. (1996). Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Unpublished manuscript.

13.

Loza, W., Dhaliwal, G., Kroner, D., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Reliability, construct, and concurrent validities of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 356-374.

14.

Loza, W.,& Green, K. (in press). The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: Aself-report measure for predicting recidivism versus clinician administered measures. A five-year follow-up study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

15.

Loza, W., & Loza-Fanous, A. (1999a). Anger and prediction of violent and non-violent offender’s recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1014-1029.

16.

Loza, W.,& Loza-Fanous, A. (1999b). The fallacy of reducing rape and violent recidivism by treating anger. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(4), 492-502.

17.

Loza, W.,& Loza-Fanous, A. (2000). Predictive validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): A tool for assessing violent and non-violent release failures. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1183-1191.

18.

Loza, W.,& Loza-Fanous, A. (2001). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) in predicting offenders’ post-release outcome: A comparison study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 105-121.

19.

Loza, W.,& Loza-Fanous, A. (2002). The effectiveness of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) as an offenders’ classification measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 3-13.

20.

Loza, W.,& Loza-Fanous, A. (in press). More evidence for the validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) for predicting violent and non-violent recidivism: A five year follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior.

21.

Luciani, F., Motiuk, L. L., & Nafekh, M. (1996). An operational review of the Custody Rating Scale: Reliability, validity, and practical utility. Report No R-47.Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.

22.

Motiuk, L. (1997). Classification for correctional programming: The Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process. Forum on Corrections Research, 9, 18-22.

23.

Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decisions-making in Canada: Research towards decision guidelines. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.

24.

Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1992). A comparison of criminal recidivism among schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 397-408.

25.

Serin, R. C., Peters, R. D.,& Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Predictors of psychopathy and release outcome in a criminal population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 419-422.

26.

Shah, S. (1978). Dangerousness: Aparadigm for exploring some issues in lawand psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 224-238.

27.

Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Wong, S. (1985). Criminal and institutional behaviors of psychopaths. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.

29.

Zinger, I.,& Forth, A. (1998, July). Psychopathy and Canadian criminal proceedings: The potential for human rights abuses. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 237-276.