A series of functional measurement experiment show that prisoners modulate their moral judgments of violations of their in-group regulations. The participants were 67 women and 80 men, sentenced for at least three years for murder, robbery, drug-traffic or white collar offenses. Each was asked, individually, to imagine a series of incidents where incriminating information on in-group or out-group inmates is delivered to the prison authorities or to an in-group source and to rate the deserved denigration of the informer, who was characterized as a leader or not and as a drug-addict or not who had a prison-leave or not. An assignment of approximately equal weight for social status, drug use and prison leave was found, beyond gender and type of offense. In line with the hypothesis of judgmental modularity, informing to an out-group source was judged much more severely than informing to in-group arbiter and than informing on an out-group inmate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Anderson, N. H. (1991a). Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 1. Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Anderson, N. H. (1991b). Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 2. Social. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Anderson, N. H. (1991c). Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 3. Developmental. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Anderson, N. H. (1991d). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 2. [correct #?] Social. (pp. 243-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Anderson, N. H., & Cuneo, D. (1978). The height + width rule in children’s judgments of quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 335-378.
8.
Astor, R. A. (1994). Children’s moral reasoning about family and peer violence: The role of provocation and retribution. Child Development, 65, 1054-1067.
9.
Blackburn, R. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct: Theory, research and practice. New York: Wiley.
10.
Blair, R. J. R. (1997). Moral reasoning and the child with psychopathic tendencies. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 731-739.
11.
Bonny, H., & Wolf, Y. (2002). Juvenile delinquents’perception of violence in terms of blame and punishment. Society and Welfare, 21, 489-506 (Hebrew; English abstract).
12.
Clancy, T. (1994). Without remorse. New York: Bantam Books.
13.
Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Vol. 1. Theoretical foundations and research validations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Demetriou, A. (1988). The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Toward an integration. New York: Elsevier.
15.
Eshet-Sabbag, T. (1995). Judgments of seriousness of crime by prisoners in protective custody. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel (Hebrew; English abstract).
16.
Genet, J. (1964). The thief’s journal. New York: Grove Press.
17.
Genet, J. (1965). Our lady of the flowers. New York: Grove Press.
18.
Genet, J. (1966). Miracle of the rose. New York: Grove Press.
19.
Haimov, R., & Wolf, Y. (2002). Moral judgment of eyewitness testimony among prison inmates. In M. Addad & Y. Wolf (Eds.), Crime and social deviance: Programmatic, empirical and applied perspectives (Hebrew; English abstract, 273-303).
20.
Howe, E. S., & Loftus, T. C. (1992). Integration of intention and outcome information by students and circuit court judges: Design economy and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 102-116.
21.
Kellerman, J. (1991). Private eyes. London: MacDonnald.
22.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
23.
Meloy, J. R. (1988). The psychopathic mind. New York: Aronson.
24.
Moore, P. J., & Gump, B. B. (1995). Information integration in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2158-2179.
25.
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1932)
26.
Reid, W. H., Dorr, D., Walker, J. I., & Bonner, J. W., III (1986). Unmasking the psychopath. New York: W. W Norton.
27.
Rest, J. R., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 5-28.
28.
Rest, J. R., Turiel, E., & Kohlberg, L. (1994). Fundamental research in moral development: A compendium. New York: Garland.
29.
Schallenberger, M. E. (1894). A study of children’s rights, as seen by themselves. Pedagogical Seminary, 3, 87-96.
30.
Sheley, J. F. (1989). Understanding crime: Concepts, issues, decisions. New York: Wadsworth.
31.
Stastney, C., & Tyrnauer, G. (1982). Who rules the joint? Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32.
Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison. New York: Free Press.
33.
Walker, L. J., De Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842-858.
34.
Wolf, Y. (1995). Estimation of Euclidean quantity by 5-and 6-year-old children: Facilitating a multiplication rule. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 49-75.
35.
Wolf, Y. (2001). Modularity in everyday life judgments of aggression and violent behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 6, 1-34.
36.
Wolf, Y., & Algom, D. (1987). Perceptual and memorial constructs in children’s judgments of quantity: A low of across representation invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 381-397.
37.
Wolf, Y., Battash, I., Addad, M., & Walters, J. (1992). Valuation of moral information by juvenile delinquents. International Journal of Group Tensions, 22, 39-62.
38.
Wolfgang, E. W. (1989). Prisons. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
