Forensic psychiatric patients exhibit complex clinical issues that are neither readily understood by staff nor necessarily responsive to traditional psychotherapy or treatment milieu approaches. Individualized treatment planning identifies treatment needs and matches them to treatment services, thereby increasing the opportunity for a positive therapeutic out-come. The nature of the Rorschach, particularly that it bypasses volitional resources, enables observation and quantification of personality processes, making the Rorschach uniquely suited for treatment planning in forensic settings. In this article, the authors review relevant Rorschach literature, address the importance of incorporating Rorschach data into the assessment process, and discuss how Rorschach data fit into a thorough assessment that includes historical, clinical, dispositional, and contextual information. The authors offer two case examples to illustrate how Rorschach data are integrated in forensic treatment planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acklin, M. W., McDowell, C. J., Verschell, M. S., & Chan, D. (2000). Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach comprehensive system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(1), 15-47.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Bannatyne, L. A., Gacono, C. B., & Greene, R. L. (1999). Differential patterns of responding among three groups of chronic, psychotic, forensic outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(12), 1553-1565.
4.
Cooper, S., & Arnow, D. (1986). An object relations view of the borderline defenses: A Rorschach analysis. In M. Kissen (Ed.), Assessing object relations phenomena (pp. 143-171). Madison, CT: International University Press.
5.
Davison, S., Leese, M., & Taylor, P. J. (2001). Examination of the screening properties of the Personality DiagnosticQuestionnaire 4+ (PDQ-4+) in a prison population. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15(2), 180-194.
6.
Exner, J. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Vol. 1: Basic foundations (3rd ed.). NewYork: John Wiley.
7.
Exner, J. E. (2001). A Rorschach workbook for the comprehensive system (5th ed.). Asheville, NC:Rorschach Workshops.
8.
Gacono, C. B. (1990). An empirical study of object relations and defensive operations in antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54(3-4), 589-600.
9.
Gacono, C. B. (1998). The use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) and Rorschach in treatment planning with antisocial personality disordered patients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 49-64.
10.
Gacono, C. B. (Ed.). (2000). The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide. Mahwah: NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Gacono, C. B. (2002). Introduction to a special series: Psychological testing in forensic settings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 274-280.
12.
Gacono, C. B., & Bodholdt, R. (in press). The role of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) in violence and risk assessment. Journal of Threat Assessment.
13.
Gacono, C. B., Loving, J. L., & Bodholdt, R. (2001). The Rorschach and psychopathy: Toward a more accurate understanding of the research findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(1), 16-38.
14.
Gacono, C. B., & Meloy, J. R. (1994). The Rorschach assessment of aggressive and psychopathic personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Gacono, C. B., & Meloy, J. R. (in press). Assessing antisocial and psychopathic personalities. In J.Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment (2nd ed.).
16.
Hare, R. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
17.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1989). MMPI-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D.T.R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 278-296.
19.
Hilsenroth, M. J., Handler, L., Toman, K. M., & Padawer, J. R. (1995). Rorschach and MMPI-2 indices of early psychotherapy termination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(6), 956-965.
20.
Kosson, D., Gacono, C., & Bodholdt, R. (2000). Assessing psychopathy: Interpersonal aspect and clinical interviewing. In The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Kwawer, J. (1980). Primitive interpersonal modes, borderline phenomena, and Rorschach content. In J. Kwawer, H. Lerner, P. Lerner, & A. Sugarman (Eds.), Borderline phenomena and the Rorschach test (pp. 89-106). New York: International University Press.
22.
Lerner, P. M., & Lerner, H. D. (1980). Rorschach assessment of primitive defenses in borderline personality structure. In J. Kwawer, H. Lerner, P. Lerner, & A. Sugarman (Eds.), Borderline phenomena and the Rorschach test (pp. 257-274). New York: International University Press.
23.
McCann, J. T. (1998). Defending the Rorschach in court: An analysis of admissibility using legal and professional standards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 125-144.
24.
Meloy, J. R. (1988). The psychopathic mind: Origins, dynamics, and treatment. Northvale, NJ: JasonAronson.
25.
Meloy, J. R. (1991). Rorschach testimony. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 19, 221-235.
26.
Meloy, J. R., Acklin, M. W., Gacono, C. B., Murray, J. F., & Peterson, C. A. (Eds.). (1997). Contemporary Rorschach interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Meyer, G. J. (1997). Thinking clearly about reliability: More critical corrections regarding the Rorschach comprehensive system. Psychological Assessment, 9(4), 495-498.
28.
Meyer, G. J. (2000). On the science of Rorschach research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(1),46-81.
29.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001).Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Piotrowski, C. (1996). The status of Exner’s comprehensive system in contemporary research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1341-1342.
31.
Shontz, F. C., & Green, P. (1992). Trends in research on the Rorschach: Review and recommendations.Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 149-156.
32.
Swanson, J. W., Borum, R., Swartz, M. S., Hiday, V. A., Wagner, H. R., & Burns, B. J. (2001). Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce arrests among persons with severe mental illness? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 156-189.
33.
Urist, J. (1977). The Rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(1), 3-9.
34.
Viglione, D. J. (1999). A review of resent research addressing the utility of the Rorschach. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 251-265.
35.
Weiner, I. B. (1994). Rorschach assessment. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 249-278). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Weiner, I. B. (1998). Principles of Rorschach interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Weiner, I. B. (2000a). Making Rorschach interpretation as good as it can be. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(2), 164-174.
38.
Weiner, I. B. (2000b). Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 435-438.
39.
Weiner, I. B., & Exner, J. E., Jr. (1991). Rorschach changes in long-term and short-term psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 453-465.
