Previous research on cognitive skills treatment programs has not included a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of these programs in reducing recidivism. This article reviews recent recidivism studies for two rehabilitation programs: Moral Reconation Therapy, which attempts to reduce recidivism by increasing the moral reasoning abilities of offenders, and Reasoning and Rehabilitation, which aims to educate offenders to change underlying criminogenic thoughts and attitudes. Using the Maryland Scale for Scientific Rigor, these studies were evaluated for their methodological strength and for the program’s success in reducing the recidivism of offenders. In considering the findings and the strength of the methods for each program, this review concludes that Moral Reconation Therapy and Reasoning and Rehabilitation programs appear to be successful approaches to reducing recidivism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2.
Arbuthnot, J., & Gordon, D. A. (1988). Crime and cognition: Community applications of sociomoral reasoning development. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 379-393.
3.
Burnett, W. L. (1997). Treating post-incarcerated offenders with moral reconation therapy(r): A oneyear recidivism study. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 6, 2-2.
4.
Charlton, B. G. (1996). The uses and abuses of meta-analysis. Family Practice, 13, 397-401.
5.
Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the “nothing works” debate. In L. Goodstein & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison(pp. 23-44). New York: Plenum.
6.
Fabiano, E. A., Porporino, F. J., & Robinson, D. (1991). Canada’s cognitive skills program corrects offenders faulty thinking. Corrections Today, 53, 102-108.
7.
Gendreau, P.,& Ross, R. R. (1981).Offender rehabilitation: The appeal of success. Federal Probation, 45, 45-48.
8.
Gendreau, P.,& Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivification or rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980’s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
9.
Godwin, G., Stone, S., & Hambrock, K. (1995). Recidivism study: Lake County, Florida detention center. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4, 6-6.
10.
Johnson, G., & Hunter, R. M. (1995). Evaluation of the specialized drug offender program. In R. R. Ross & B. Ross (Eds.), Thinking straight(pp. 215-234). Ottawa, Canada: Cognitive Center.
11.
Jones, M.,& Sims, B. (1997). Recidivism of offenders released from prison in North Carolina: Agender comparison. Prison Journal, 77, 335-348.
12.
Knott, C. (1995). The STOP programme: Reasoning and rehabilitation in a British setting. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending—Guidelines from research and practice(pp. 115-126). New York: John Wiley.
13.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In T. Lockona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues(pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
Krueger, S. (1997). Five-year recidivism study ofMRT(r)-treated offenders in a county jail. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 6, 3-3.
15.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
16.
Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1988). Moral reconation therapy: A systematic step-by-step treatment system for treatment resistant clients. Psychological Reports, 62, 135-151.
17.
Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1989a). Effects of moral reconation therapy upon moral reasoning, life purpose, and recidivism among drug and alcohol offender. Psychological Reports, 64, 83-90.
18.
Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1989b). Relationship of DUI recidivism to moral reasoning, sensation seeking, and MacAndrew alcoholism scores. Psychological Reports, 65, 1171-1174.
19.
Little, G. L.,& Robinson, K. D. (1989c). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: Aoneyear recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 64, 960-962.
20.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D.,& Burnette, K. D. (1990). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: A two-year follow-up. Psychological Reports, 66, 1379-1387.
21.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1991a). Treating drug offenders with moral reconation therapy: A three-year recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 69, 1151-1154.
22.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1991b). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: A three-year report. Psychological Reports, 69, 953-954
23.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1993a). Cognitive behavioral treatment of felony drug offenders: A five-year recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 73, 1089-1090.
24.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1993b). 42 month alcohol treatment data: Multiple DWI offenders treated with MRT show lower recidivism rates. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 2, 5-5.
25.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D.,& Burnette, K. D. (1994). Treating offenders with cognitive-behavioral therapy: 5-year recidivism outcome data onMRT. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 3, 1-3.
26.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, E. S. (1996). Review of outcome data with MRTtm: Seven year recidivism results. Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Review, 5, 1-7.
27.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, S. (1995a). Seven-year recidivism of felony offenders treated with MRTtm. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4, 6-6.
28.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, S. (1995b). Six-year MRTtm recidivism data on felons and DWI offenders: Treated offenders show significantly lower reincarceration. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4(1), 4-5.
29.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (1998). What works in corrections? An examination of the effectiveness of the type of rehabilitation programs offered byWashington State Department of Corrections(Report to the State ofWashington Legislature, Joint Audit and ReviewCommittee). College Park, MD: Crime Prevention Effectiveness Program.
30.
Mahoney, M. J.,& Lyddon, W. J. (1988). Recent developments in cognitive approaches to counseling and psychotherapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 16, 190-234.
31.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
32.
Porporino, F. J., Fabiano, E. A.,& Robinson, D. (1991). Focusing on successful reintegration: Cognitive skills training for offenders, R-19. Ottawa: The Correctional Service of Canada, Research and Statistics Branch.
33.
Porporino, F. J., & Robinson, D. (1995). An evaluation of the reasoning and rehabilitation program with Canadian federal offenders. In R. R. Ross& B. Ross (Eds.), Thinking straight(pp. 155-190). Ottawa, Canada: Cognitive Centre.
34.
Raynor, P.,& Vanstone, M. (1996). Reasoning and rehabilitation in Britain: The results of the straight thinking on probation (STOP) programme. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 272-284.
35.
Robinson, D. (1995). The impact of cognitive skills training on post-release recidivism among Canadian federal offenders. Ottawa: The Correctional Service Canada, Correctional Research and Development.
36.
Ross, R. R. (1995). The reasoning and rehabilitation program for high risk probationers and prisoners. In R. R. Ross, D. H. Antonowicz, & G. K. Dhaliwal (Eds.), Going straight: Effective delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation(pp. 173-195). Ottawa, Canada: AIR Training.
37.
Ross, R. R., & Fabiano, E. A. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.
38.
Ross, R. R., Fabiano, E. A., & Ewles, C. D. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 29-36.
39.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
40.
Silver, E., Smith, W. R.,& Banks, S. (2000). Constructing actuarial devices for predicting recidivism: A comparison of methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 733-764.
41.
Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
