In this article, the authors use both qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the experiences of offenders on house arrest with electronic monitoring. The data suggest that offenders, for the most part, do not view house arrest with electronic monitoring as particularly problematic, and most cite positive aspects of their program in comparison to jail. However, some aspects of the sanction are seen as more punitive than others, and there is important variation in how punitive offenders view the sanction. With few exceptions, however, offenders’perceptions were not strongly correlated with social and demographic characteristics. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for criminal justice policy regarding this alternative sanction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, H. E., & Simonsen, C. E. (1986). Corrections in America (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2.
Beccaria, C. (1963). Essays on crime and punishment (H. Paolucci, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill (Original work published 1764).
3.
Benson, M. (1984). The fall from grace: Loss of occupational status as a consequence of conviction for a white collar crime. Criminology, 22(4), 573-592.
4.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Brubaker, S. C. (1989). In praise of punishment. The Public Interest, 97, 44-55.
6.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Charles, M. T. (1989). Electronic monitoring for juveniles. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12(2), 147-169.
8.
Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. Boston: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
Cressey, D. (1961). The prison: Studies in institutional and organizational change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
Crouch, B. M. (1993). Is prison really worse? Analysis of offenders’preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67-88.
11.
Fleisher, M. S. (1995). Beggars and thieves: Lives of urban street criminals. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
12.
Gainey, R. R., Payne, B. K., & O’Toole, M. (1998). Time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: An event history analysis. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Southern Conference on Corrections, Palm Beach FL.
13.
Gerber, J., & Engelhardt-Greer, S. (1996). Just and painful: Attitudes toward sentencing criminals. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor.
15.
Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1992). Drug treatment and electronically monitored home confinement. Crime and Delinquency, 38(2), 158-170.
16.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Larivee, J. J. (1993). Community corrections: A risky business. Corrections Today, 55(6), 20-24.
18.
Lombardo, L. (1981). Guards imprisoned: Correctional officers at work. New York: Elsevier.
19.
MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain’t no makin’it: Leveled aspirations in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
20.
Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42(2), 149-163.
21.
Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994a). Perceptions of punishment: Inmate and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison Journal, 74, 306-323.
22.
Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994b). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. inter- mediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58, 3-8.
23.
Rafter, N. (1998). Crime in the media: A symposium. Paper presented at the Old Dominion Film Festival, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
24.
Richards, B. (1978). The experience of long-term imprisonment: An exploratory investigation. British Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(2), 162-169.
25.
Schwartz, H., & Jacobs, J. (1979). Qualitative sociology: A method to the madness. New York: Free Press.
26.
Sherman, L. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of the criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445-473.
27.
Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 32(2), 107-135.
28.
Sykes, G. M. (1956). Men, merchants, and toughs: A study of reactions to imprisonment. Social Problems, 4, 130-138.
29.
Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Thomas, C. (1989). Electronic monitoring supervision: A helping and controlling experience—Case study from Jefferson County, Texas. In K. Russel & J. R. Lilly (Eds.), The electronic monitoring of offenders: Symposium papers (pp. 45-64). Leicester, UK: Leicester Polytechnic Law School.
31.
van den Haag, E., & Conrad, J. (1983). The death penalty: A debate. New York: Plenum.
32.
Van Voorhis, P. (1993). Psychological determinants of the prison experience. The Prison Journal, 73(1), 72-102.
33.
Van Voorhis, P., Browning, S. L., Simon, M., & Gordon, J. (1997). The meaning of punishment: Inmates’ orientation to the prison experience. The Prison Journal, 77(2), 135-167.
34.
von Hirsch, A. (1990). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York: Hill & Wang.
35.
Whittington, M. (1989). Supervised electronic monitoring confinement in Orange County, California. In K. Russel & J. R. Lilly (Eds.), The electronic monitoring of offenders: Symposium papers (pp. 65-81). Leicester, UK: Leicester Polytechnic Law School.
36.
Wood, P. B., & Grasmick, H. G. (1995). Inmates rank the severity of ten alternative sanctions compared to prison. Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Consortium, 2, 30-42.
