Five experiments explored, within the framework of functional measurement, the importance assigned by 3rd and 4th graders (n = 117) to expectations of potential perpetrators from their potential victims. Each participant was requested to imagine potential incidents of school violence where four familiar classmates were presented as protagonists (i.e., perpetrator and victim). An orderly manipulation of the combination of the level (high or low) of aggressiveness and susceptibility to victimization in each protagonist was made. The participants were informed whether or not the victim was about to deliver tangible rewards, display signs of suffering, or retaliate (2*2*2=8 conditions). For each potential incident, the participant estimated the likelihood that an attack will take place. The following order of importance was found: Reward > Retaliation > Suffering. Victim’s aggressiveness was slightly effective. From an applied perspective, most notable is the tendency to lower the likelihood of violence when the educator knows about the incidents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Anderson, N. H. (1991a). Contributions to information theory, Vol. 1: Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Anderson, N. H. (1991b). Contributions to information theory, Vol. 2: Social. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Anderson, N. H. (1991c). Contributions to information theory, Vol. 3: Developmental. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Anderson, N. H. (n.d.). Unified theory. Unpublished chapter prepared for Festchrift for Bill McGuire.
8.
Anderson, N. H., & Cuneo, D. (1978). The height + width rule in children’s judgments of quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 335-378.
9.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Barrett-Lennard, G. (1993). The phases and focus of empathy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 66, 3-14.
12.
Bartholow, B. D., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2001). A psychophysiological examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social expectancy behavior. Psychological Science,12, 197-204.
13.
Ben-David, S. (2000). Victimology at the transition from the 20th to the 21st century: Festschrift for Hans Joachim Schneider. Monchengladbach: World Society of Victimology Publishing.
14.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin,106, 59-73.
15.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Burwood, L., & Wyeth, R. (1998). Should school promote toleration?Journal of Moral Education,27, 465-473.
17.
Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Phillips, C. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81, 17-32.
18.
Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Dollard, J., Doob, L., Miller, N., Mowrer, O., & Sears, R. (1939). Frustration and aggression.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?Cognition and Emotion,14, 61-92.
21.
Geen, R. G., & Quanti, M. B. (1977). The catharsis of aggression: An evaluation of a hypothesis. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 1-37). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Haimov, R., & Wolf, Y. (2002). Moral judgment of eyewitness testimony among prison inmates. In M. Addad & Y. Wolf (Eds.),Crime and social deviance: Programmatic, empirical and applied perspectives (pp. 273-305). Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar-Ilan University Press (in Hebrew; English abstract).
23.
Idisis, Y. (2002). Aggression and victimization in professional football: An analysis in terms of the beholders’perceived and enacted violence. Doctoral dissertation, Bar-Ilan University (in Hebrew; English abstract).
24.
Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). Which behaviors do people explain? A basic actor-observer asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 288-304.
25.
Perry, D. J., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
26.
Perry, G. D., Wiliard, J. C., & Perry, L. C. (1990). Peers perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development,61, 1310-1325.
27.
Staats, A. (1999). Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda. Review of General Psychology,3, 3-13.
28.
Wigs, J. S., & Winder, C. L. (1961). The peer nomination inventory: An empirically derived sociometric measure of adjustment in preadolescent boys. Psychological Reports,9, 643-677.
29.
Wolf, Y. (1985). Aggression: Problems of definition and identification. Crime and Social Deviance, 13, 25-36 (in Hebrew; English abstract).
30.
Wolf, Y. (1995). Estimation of Euclidian quantity by 5- and 6-year-old children: Facilitating a multiplication rule. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,59, 49-75.
31.
Wolf, Y. (2001). Modularity in everyday life judgments of aggression and violent behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 1-34.
32.
Wolf, Y. (2002). Violations of out-group and in-group regulations in the eyes of ordinary and protected prisoners: An instance of judgmental modularity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,46, 206-219.
33.
Wolf, Y., & Algom, D. (1987). Perceptual and memorial constructs in children’s judgments of quantity: A low of across representation invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 381-397.
34.
Wolf, Y., & Shimkin, T. (n.d.). Professional basketball’s unsportsmanlike fouls in the eyes of the beholders. Unpublished manuscript.
