Abstract

Poet John Kinsella talks to
Kinsella’s comments on his homeland come after the board of the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers called on Australian prime minister Tony Abbott to protect press freedom by revising the initial part of new national security laws, which stipulated that journalists could face 10 years in jail for reporting on a “special intelligence operation”.
Kinsella says: “The government impositions on journalism, internet and personal liberties are only part of a complex picture of suppression. There are many Australians who censor each other, oppress their fellows by demeaning their religious, social, identity and political freedoms.”
Has he ever had his own poetry censored? “Never by my book editors or publishers, but I have been in many other ways – including by literary and other journals who have dropped overtly politicised poems ‘on advice’. And I had a ‘rewording’ issue for legal reasons with another journal.”
When asked if self-censorship is a problem, Kinsella says: “Too often, review-culture is praise or hate, and is driven by fear that Australian identity (that is, the nationalist version) will be undermined or especially shamed overseas.”
Kinsella considers himself an “activist poet”. “I use all ‘methods’ in my poetry, from the lyric to the rant, from figurative language to factual details. I don’t wish to ‘tell’ anyone how or what to think, but rather to prompt discussion and concern, to open different ways (maybe) of seeing and hearing.”
He calls the two poems Index is publishing here “direct indictments of the loss of rights to an increasing militarisation of Australian society”. He adds: “I don’t need to provide statistics to show the impoverishment and exploitation of Australian indigenous peoples – mining companies have become very adept at manipulating and claiming rights where they should have no rights. It is indigenous land, and usage needs constant negotiating. Of course, ‘we’ are all part of the place now, and we have rights, but those rights should not occlude or deny the rights of traditional peoples.”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott is accused of pushing Australia into a new age of censorship in the name of national security
Credit: Lukas Coch/AAP/Press Association Images
All you see will be seen or, say, unsaid – your words another’s a cluster’s. Seen and not heard is an old way few of us would raise our children by – history? Incognito (mode)? Obliterate? Following in the footsteps. I watched blue butterflies for so long in summer they hurt my eyes and yet they have such short lives – these, their last lives? Sifting for the well- being. Of me. You. Blue Butterflies. I warrant we won’t think further; giving up what you can’t see won’t hurt.
Poet John Kinsella
Credit: Tracy Ryan
‘The delicate balance between freedom and security may have to shift’ – Tony Abbott, Australian Prime Minister
Tilting on edge, the fall. Point of return profitable as security. Butterfly with its effect torn off — as brutal as the cruel child, bitter adult. Sets the gallery’s seismographs off before walls even move, art stable as iron ore. Sovereign with self-styled head, done in coal. Doesn’t require comparison with other titular heads: needs no precedent, is its own pedestal. Your signature, elusive and solid as its digital record. You’ve created a placebo, ephemera: together we can keep an eye on each other, push the shift key.
