Employing the Concurrent Design Philosophy in Developing an Engineering Design Science Programme

Abstract

North American undergraduate mechanical engineering design education has failed to meet the needs of industry in educating students in effective design philosophies typified by the concurrent engineering design philosophy. Current programmes emphasize traditional engineering analysis courses, leaving little room for truly educating the students in the fundamentals of mechanical engineering design. This paper uses the concurrent engineering design paradigm to design a programme for the education of students in mechanical engineering design. The basics of concurrent engineering design are outlined, the failings of typical design education stated, and an exploration of the required features of a new design curriculum presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rank

P. G.

, Concurrent/Simultaneous Engineering (Methods, Tools & Case Studies), Guildford, England, CIMware Limited, 1994.

Boothroyd

, ‘Product design for manufacture and assembly’, Computer Aided Design, 26(7), July, 505–520 (1994).

Eder

W. E.

, ‘Survey of Design Education’, Proc. of 1987 International Conference on Engineering Design, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 881–887.

Dixon

R. D.

, ‘The state of education’, Mechanical Engineering, February, 64–67 (1991).

Dixon

R. D.

, ‘New goals for engineering education’, Mechanical Engineering, March, 56–62 (1991).

Boley

, ‘Engineering schools flunk manufacturing’, Sensors, October, 3–4 (1992).

Chisholm

A. W. J.

, ‘An engineering design analogy for engineering design education’, Computers in Industry, 14, 197–204 (1990).

Smith

C. O.

Kardos

, ‘Need design content for accreditation? Try engineering cases!’, Engineering Education, 77(4), January, 228–230 (1987).

Suh

N. P.

, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.