The conventional single-degree-of-freedom approach to isolator design dealt with in most undergraduate curricula, is not always adequate for the design of practical isolator systems. In this article, an optimization approach to the design problem is presented and the viability of the approach demonstrated. It is, however, also shown that multiple local minima may exist and that due care should be exercised in the application of the method.
ThomsonW. T., Theory of Vibration with Applications, 3rd edn, Unwin Hyman, London, 1988.
4.
TseF. S.MorseI. E.HinkleR. T., Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Applications, 2nd edn, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, 1985.
5.
CredeC. E.RuzickaJ. E., ‘Theory of vibration isolation’, Chapter 30 of Shock and Vibration Handbook, HarrisC. M. (Ed.), 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
6.
SnymanJ. A.HeynsP. S.VermeulenP. J., ‘Vibration isolation of a mounted engine through optimization’, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 30, 109–118 (1995).
7.
SwansonD. A.WuH. T.AshrafiuonH., ‘Optimization of aircraft engine suspension systems’, Journal of Aircraft, 30, 979–984 (1993).
8.
HeynsP. S.NelC. B.SnymanJ. A., ‘Optimization of engine mounting configurations’, ISMA 19 Tools for Noise and Vibration Analysis, Leuven, September 1994.
9.
D'SouzaA. F.GargV. K., Advanced Dynamics: Modeling and Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
10.
GraceA., Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB. User's Guide, The Mathworks, Natick, MA, 1990.