Comparisons of student motivation and achievement of sustainability learning objectives in two project-based learning courses

Abstract

In 2019, the Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering Department at Valparaiso University decided to replace the required, senior-level thermodynamics II course with a course focused entirely on sustainability. To determine which course led to greater attainment of sustainability learning objectives and increased intrinsic motivation, students in the last cohort of the thermodynamics course and in the first cohort of the sustainability course were surveyed. The thermodynamics course was a required, three credit, senior-level course that included lessons on sustainability as well as four sustainability projects. The replacement course was a required, two credit, junior-level course focused entirely on sustainability, and it also included four sustainability projects. The impacts of each course on student motivation and their self-assessment of the learning objectives were compared to determine which course was better from an educational perspective. The results showed that students’ self-evaluation of the learning objectives was not significantly different between the two courses. Students in the thermodynamics course also stated they were more motivated intrinsically while also increasing their confidence and competence. Due to the increase in motivation with no significant decrease in the achievement of the learning objectives, it can be argued that the enhanced thermodynamics course was better for teaching sustainability concepts than the course focused entirely on sustainability.

Keywords

Sustainability project-based learning intrinsic motivation extrinsic motivation identified regulation external regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Taheri

. Project-Based approach in a first-year engineering course to promote project management and sustainability. Int J Eng Pedagogy 2018; 8: 104–119.

Perrault

Albert

. Utilizing project-based learning to increase sustainability attitudes among students. Appl Environ Educ Commun 2018; 17: 96–105.

Yohe

Lasco

Ahmad

, et al. Perspectives on Climate Change and Sustainability Coordinating Lead Authors: Lead Authors: Review Editors: This Chapter Should Be Cited as:: Perspectives on Climate Change and Sustainability. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2007.

ABET. “2022-2023 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Engineering Accreditation Commission,” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/. 2021.

National Academy of Engineering. “NAE GRAND CHALLENGES FOR ENGINEERING,” http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/16091.aspx. [Online]. Available: www.engineeringchallenges.org. 2012.

Dewey

. Democracy and Education. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1916.

Bruner

. The Act of Discovery. Harv Educ Rev 1961; 31: 21–32.

Haury

. Teaching Science through Inquiry. [Online]. Available: www.eric.ed.gov. 1993.

Prince

Felder

. Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J Eng Educ 2006; 95: 123–138.

10.

Hansen

. Does productivity apply to PBL methods in engineering education? Int J Eng Educ 2003; 19: 177–182. [Online]. Available: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html.

11.

Ortiz-Marcos

Fransson

Hagstrom

, et al. PBL In an international context in sustainability and the global economy. Int J Eng Educ 2016; 32: 2284–2293.

12.

Gratchev

Jeng

. Introducing a project-based assignment in a traditionally taught engineering course. Eur J Eng Educ 2018; 43: 788–799.

13.

Zull

. The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching the Practice of Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2002.

14.

Sriraman

Torres

Martinez Ortiz

. Teaching sustainable engineering and industrial ecology using a hybrid problem-project based learning approach. J Eng Technol 2017; 34: 8–15.

15.

Lehmann

Christensen

, et al. Problem-Oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. Eur J Eng Educ 2008; 33: 283–295.

16.

Brundiers

Wiek

. Do we teach what we preach? An international comparison of problem- and project-based learning courses in sustainability. Sustain (Switzerland) 2013; 5: 1725–1746.

17.

Wiek

Xiong

Brundiers

, et al. Integrating problem and project-based learning into sustainability programs: A case study on the school of sustainability at Arizona state university. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 2014; 15: 431–449.

18.

McKay

Raffo

. Project-Based learning: A case study in sustainable design. Int J Eng Educ 2007; 23: 1096–1115. [Online]. Available: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html.

19.

Habash

Hasan

Chiasson

, et al. Phenomenon-and project-based learning through the Lens of sustainability*. Int J Eng Educ 2022; 38: 110–116.

20.

Hansen

Dahms

M-L

Otrel-Cass

, et al. Problem Based Learning and Sustainability: Practice and Potential. Copenhagen, Denmark: Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University, 2014.

21.

Chua

. Performance differences between first-time students undergoing hybrid and pure project-based learning. Int J Eng Educ 2014; 30: 1200–1212. [Online]. Available: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html.

22.

Tomkinson

Dobson

, et al. Education for sustainable development - an inter-disciplinary pilot module for undergraduate engineers and scientists. Int J Sustain Eng 2008; 1: 69–76.

23.

Frank

Lavy

Elata

. Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. Int J Technol Des Educ 2003; 13: 273–288.

24.

. Integrating sustainability into the introduction of environmental engineering. J Profl Issues Eng Educ Pract 2015; 141: C5014004. 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000227

25.

Payne

Jesiek

. Enhancing transdisciplinary learning through community-based design projects: Results from a mixed methods study. Int J Serv Learn Eng, Human Eng Soc Entrepren 2018; 13: 1–52.

26.

Stolk

Martello

Olin

. Can disciplinary integration promote Students’ lifelong learning attitudes and skills in project-based engineering courses? Int J Eng Educ 2015; 31: 434–449. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272564676.

27.

Fini

Awadallah

Parast

, et al. The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses. Eur J Eng Educ 2018; 43: 473–488.

28.

Tan

. Students’ experiences in problem-based learning: Three blind mice episode or educational innovation? Innov Educ Teach Int 2004; 41: 169–184.

29.

Tasdemir

Gazo

. Integrating sustainability into higher education curriculum through a transdisciplinary perspective. J Clean Prod 2020; 265: 121759. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121759

30.

Duarte

Malheiro

Arno

, et al. Engineering education for sustainable development: The European project semester approach. IEEE Trans Educ 2020; 63: 108–117.

31.

Guay

Vallerand

Blanchard

. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motiv Emot 2000; 24: 175–213.

32.

Pintrich

De Groot

. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J Educ Psychol 1990; 82: 33–40.