Aerodynamics learning based on the development of an simplified conceptual glider design and flight testing

Abstract

This study explores numerically and experimentally the conceptual design of a glider aircraft, focusing on achieving stable and efficient flight. The purpose of the work was the applied learning of aerodynamics for an undergraduate course in aerospace engineering. After research, simulations, and theoretical analyses, the project progressed to the practical stage, involving the construction and flight testing of the aircraft. This research included the identification of possible airfoils, consideration of Reynolds number limits and detailed analyses in XFLR5. Methods such as the Lifting Line Theorem and the Vortex Lattice Method were studied and applied in the project development.This approach underlines the study’s education aim - to demonstrate the practical application of theoretical knowledge. In summary, the design process, emphasizing the key milestones and challenges encountered during the manufacturing phase and the outcomes of the flight tests are discussed in detail. The project enabled the simulation and validation of aerodynamic concepts through construction, yielding flight results that were consistent with previous numerical predictions. This demonstrates that the proposed educational approach significantly enhances the practical application of theoretical knowledge in aerodynamics.

Keywords

Airfoils glider design aerodynamics simulations theorem

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shyy

. Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Data da primeira publicacão: 2007.

Katz

Plotkin

. Low speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Millikan

. Aerodynamics of the airplane. Reprint. :New York: Dover Publications, 1941. Data da primeira publicacão: 1941.

Anderson

. Fundamentals of aerodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill, McGraw Hill Series in Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering, 2010.

Yadav

Subedi

Lundeberg

, et al. Problem-based learning: influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. J Eng Educ 2011; 100: 253–280.

Rodríguez González

Fernández Batanero

. A review of problem-based learning applied to engineering. EduRe J Int J Adv Educ Res 2016; 3: 14–31.

Kardoyo Nurkhin

Muhsin , et al. Problem-based learning strategy: its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills. Eur J Educ Res 2020; 9: 1141–1150.

Airfoiltools. Airfoil tools, 2024. http://www.airfoiltools.com/ .

Winslow

Otsuka

Govindarajan

, et al. Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105). J Aircr 2018; 55: 1050–1061.

10.

Bertin

Cummings

. Aerodynamic for engineers. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2009.

11.

Prandtl

. A life for fluid mechanics and aeronautical research. Berlin: Springer, 2019.

12.

Septiyana

Hidayat

Rizaldi

, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic characteristics using the vortex lattice method on twin tail boom unmanned aircraft. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international seminar on metallurgy and materials (ISMM2019): exploring new innovation in metallurgy and materials. AIP Publishing, p.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002337.

13.

Kerwin

. Hydrofoils and propellers. Lecture Notes, April 13, 2001.

14.

Benaouali

Kachel

. Multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft wing using commercial software integration. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019; 92: 766–776.

15.

Administration

. Aerodynamics of flight, 2024. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/07_phak_ch5_0.pdf. Chapter 5 of the Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge.

16.

Krauklis

Karl

Gagani

, et al. Composite material recycling technology—state-of-the-art and sustainable development for the 2020s. J Compos Sci 2021; 5: 28.

17.

Chakraborty

Ghosh

. A CFD study on the structural parameters of NACA 2412 airfoil based air-wing using different composite materials. Mater Today Proc 2022; 60: 894–901.