Evaluation of pursuance intention among mechanical and manufacturing engineering students in the Philippines: A higher-order structural equation modeling approach
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2025
Evaluation of pursuance intention among mechanical and manufacturing engineering students in the Philippines: A higher-order structural equation modeling approach
Constant development in the fields of mechanical and manufacturing engineering has been observed since the pandemic due to the rise of technology, robotics, and connectivity. However, a decline in enrollees for these programs is evident. The main objective of this study was to assess the pursuance intention of students to take these programs among 337 enrolled students in the Philippines. The integrated self-determination theory (SDT) and theory of planned behavior underwent a higher-order partial least square structural equation modeling analysis to completely assess significant factors affecting pursuance intention. Results showed that the SDT domains presented the most significant effect, followed by student motivation, attitude, and control. Based on the results, it could be posited that students from the Philippines believe that there are ample opportunities and careers in this engineering field. They anticipate having a well-respected profession with significant societal impact and practical applications, along with challenging responsibilities, and both local and international opportunities both local and international opportunities. In addition, they foresee great mobility, job security, and professional establishment in the future. As the first study to consider this area of analysis, the framework and methodology could be further developed, extended, and applied in other educational studies worldwide.
HusaeniDFANandiyantoABD. Bibliometric computational mapping analysis of publications on mechanical engineering education using VosViewer. J Eng Sci Technol2022; 17: 1135–1149.
2.
AminiMSharifaniKRahmaniA. Machine learning model towards evaluating data gathering methods in manufacturing and mechanical engineering. Int JAppl Sci Eng Res2023; 15: 349–362.
3.
BadiHJZekiAMFarisWF, et al.Animation as a problem-solving technique in mechanical engineering education. Int J Sci Eng Res2013; 4: 96–99.
4.
KamińskaDSapińskiTAitkenN, et al.Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education. Open Physics2017; 15: 936–941.
EnelundMKnutson WedelMLundqvistU, et al.Integration of education for sustainable development in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. Australas J Eng Educ2013; 19: 51–62.
7.
FagettePChenS-JBaranGR, et al.Engineering a general education program: Designing Mechanical Engineering General Education courses. Innovative Higher Educ2012; 38: 117–128.
KapilanNVidhyaPGaoX-Z. Virtual laboratory: A boon to the mechanical engineering education during COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Educ Future2021; 8: 31–46.
10.
TrissanW. Analysis of the factors influencing long studies and student achievement index education of mechanical engineering of Palangkaraya University. Balanga J Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan2015; 3: 63–70.
11.
LeeIHShinJMChoH-Y. Design and operation of 3D printing education curriculum in Mechanical Engineering. J Kor Soc Manuf Process Eng2015; 14: 21–26.
12.
LlanesEARochaJCPeraltaDB, et al.Project-based learning case of study education in automotive mechanical engineering. Revista Espacios2018; 39: 1–10.
13.
SchrlauMGStevensRJSchleyS. Flipping core courses in the undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculum: Heat transfer. Adv Eng Educ2016; 5: n3.
14.
BulutSGieseTWendeM, et al.Development of a gamified educational framework to teach mechanical engineering to high school students. 2020 IEEE Global Eng Educ Conf (EDUCON)2020: 1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125092
15.
MavromihalesMHolmesVRacasanR. Game-based learning in mechanical engineering education: Case study of games-based learning application in computer aided design assembly. Int J Mech Eng Educ2019; 47: 156–179.
16.
MirandaJNavarreteCNoguezJ, et al.The core components of Education 4.0 in Higher Education: Three case studies in engineering education. Comput Electr Eng2021; 93: 107278.
LaguadorJDotongC. Engineering students’ challenging learning experiences and their changing attitude towards academic performance. Eur J Educ Res2020; 9: 1127–1140.
22.
OngAKPrasetyoYTPinuguJN, et al.Determining factors influencing students’ future intentions to enroll in chemistry-related courses: Integrating self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior. Int J Sci Educ2022; 44: 556–578.
23.
RafananRJDe GuzmanCYRogayanDJr. Pursuing stem careers: Perspectives of senior high school students. Participatory Educ Res2020; 7: 38–58.
24.
Sunyoto. Interest of mechanical engineering students to become entrepreneur. In: Proceedings of the 1st Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC 2019), 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.031
BunceLKingNSaranS, et al.Experiences of black and minority ethnic (BME) students in higher education: Applying self-determination theory to understand the BME attainment gap. Studies in Higher Education2019; 46: 534–547.
28.
GuayF. Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Can J School Psychol2021; 37: 75–92.
29.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychologist2000; 55: 68–78.
30.
VasconcellosDParkerPDHillandT, et al.Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Educ Psychol2020; 112: 1444–1469.
31.
DaoTKBuiATDoanTT, et al.Impact of academic majors on entrepreneurial intentions of Vietnamese students: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Heliyon2021; 7: e06381.
32.
AjzenI. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol2002; 32: 665–683.
33.
ChungP-KOuKWongMY, et al.Investigation of Hong Kong students’ esports participation intentions using the theory of planned behavior approach: A structural equation model. Hum Behav Emerging Techno2022; 2022: 1–19.
34.
GermanJDRediAAPrasetyoYT, et al.Choosing a package carrier during COVID-19 pandemic: An integration of pro-environmental planned behavior (PEPB) theory and service quality (SERVQUAL). J Cleaner Prod2022; 346: 131123.
35.
SarstedtMHairJFCheahJ-H, et al.How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas Mark J2019; 27: 197–211.
36.
XiaQChiuTKFLeeM, et al.A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Comput Educ2022; 189: 104582.
37.
LietaertSRoordaDLaeversF, et al.The gender gap in student engagement: The role of Teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. Br J Educ Psycho2015; 85: 498–518.
38.
AkbariEPilotARobert-Jan SimonsP. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in foreign language learning through Facebook. Comput Human Behav2015; 48: 126–134.
39.
ChiuTKF. Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Comput Human Behav2021a; 124: 106909.
40.
AssorAKaplanHRothG. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. Br J Educ Psychol2002; 72: 261–278.
41.
ChiuTK. Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Res Technol Educ2021b; 54: S14–S30.
42.
OngAK. A machine learning ensemble approach for predicting factors affecting STEM students’ future intention to enroll in chemistry-related courses. Sustainability2022; 14: 16041.
43.
WebbMDavisNBellT, et al.Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2LST century: Why, what and when?Educ Inf Technol2016; 22: 445–468.
44.
RuzekEAHafenCAAllenJP, et al.How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learn Instr2016; 42: 95–103.
45.
RyanRMDeciEL. Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. Adv Motivation Sci2019; 6: 111–156.
46.
LohbeckATóth-KirályIMorinAJS. Disentangling the associations of academic motivation with self-concept and academic achievement using the bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework. Contemp Educ Psychol2022; 69: 102069.
47.
PapanastasiouC. Effects of attitudes and belief on mathematics achievement. Stud Educ Eval2000; 26: 27–42.
48.
MaheshwariGKhaKL. Investigating the relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intention in Vietnam: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the theory of planned behavior. Int J Manag Educ2022; 20: 100553.
49.
LiñánFChenY. Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract2009; 33: 593–617.
50.
TsaiK-HChangH-CPengC-Y. Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: A moderated mediation model. Int Entrepreneurship Manage J2014; 12: 445–463.
51.
ArmitageCJConnerM. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J So Psychol2001; 40: 471–499.
52.
YangHCaiJYangHH, et al.Examining key factors of beginner’s continuance intention in blended learning in higher education. J Comput Higher Educ2023; 35: 126–143.
53.
CheungD. Evaluating student attitudes toward chemistry lessons to enhance teaching in the secondary school. Educ Quim2011; 22: 117–122.
54.
AkçayirMAkçayirGPektaşHM, et al.Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Comput Human Behav2016; 57: 334–342.
55.
NaeemAMirzaNAyyubRM, et al.HRM Practices and faculty’s knowledge sharing behavior: Mediation of affective commitment and affect-based trust. Stud High Edu2019; 44: 499–512.
56.
SneddonPHDouglasR. The attitudes towards, and experiences of, laboratory teaching in year 1 chemistry and physics University courses. New Directions2013; 9: 49–54.
57.
GagnéMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav2005; 26: 331–362.
58.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and Wellness. Guilford, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
59.
AdammaONEkwutosimOPUnambaEC. Influence of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on pupils academic performance in mathematics. SJME2018; 2: 52–59.
SheldrakeRMujtabaTReissMJ. Science teaching and students’ attitudes and aspirations: The importance of conveying the applications and relevance of science. Int J Educ Res2017; 85: 167–183.
62.
LaiCWangQLeiJ. What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Comput Educ2012; 59: 569–579.
63.
KilicDSEmsenPSoranH. Behavioral intention towards laboratory applications in science teaching. Procedia Soc Behav Sci2011; 28: 416–420.
64.
DewberryCJacksonDJR. An application of the theory of planned behavior to student retention. J Vocat Behav2018; 107: 100–110.
65.
PadhyBEmoKDjiraG, et al.Analyzing factors influencing teaching as a career choice using structural equation modeling. SAGE Open2015; 5: 215824401557039.
66.
NielsenTDammeyerJVangML, et al.Gender fairness in self-efficacy? A Rasch-based validity study of the general academic self-efficacy scale (Gase). Scand J Educ Res2018; 62: 664–681.
67.
LinC-HZhangYZhengB. The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Comput Educ2017; 113: 75–85.
68.
MahdiGJ. Student attitudes towards chemistry: An examination of choices and preferences. Am J Educ Res2014; 2: 351–356.
69.
HairJF. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010.
70.
AlamerA. Construct validation of self-determination theory in Second language scale: The bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Front Psychol2021; 12: 1–7.
71.
CrocettaCAntonucciLCataldoR, et al.Higher-order PLS-PM approach for different types of constructs. Soc Indic Res2021; 154: 725–754.
72.
DashGPaulJ. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 173: e121092.
73.
HamidASamiWSidekM. Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J Phys Conf Ser2017; 890: 012163.
74.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Washington, DC: The Guilford Press, 2016.
75.
HuLBentlerPM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods1998; 3: 424–453.
76.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenM. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles2008; 6: 53–60.
77.
BaumgartnerHHomburgC. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. Int J Res Mark1996; 13: 139–161.
78.
HaggeraMHamiltonK. Motivational predictors of students’ participation in out-of school learning activities and academic attainment in science: An application of the trans-contextual model using Bayesian path analysis. Learn Individ Differ2018; 67: 232–244.
79.
LinPChaiCJongM, et al.Modeling the structural relationship among primary students’ motivation to learn artificial intelligence. Comput Educ Artif Intell2021; 2: 100006.
80.
GuerinRJTolandMD. An application of a modified theory of planned behavior model to investigate adolescents’ job safety knowledge, norms, attitude and intention to enact workplace safety and health skills. J Saf Res2020; 72: 189–198.
81.
HarackiewiczJMSmithJLPriniskiSJ. Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci2016; 3: 220–227.
82.
Capon-SieberVKöhlerCAlp ChristA, et al.The role of relatedness in the motivation and vitality of university students in online classes during social distancing. Front Psychol2022; 12: 1–16.
83.
SuM-SChangT-CWuC-C, et al.Factors affecting the student career decision-making of junior high school students in central Taiwan area. Int J Inf Educ Technol2016; 6: 843–850.
84.
WangCKJLiuWCKeeYH, et al.Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon2019; 5: e01983.
85.
UrhahneDWijniaL. Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educ Psychol Rev 2023; 35: 1–35.
86.
HeckhausenJHeckhausenH. Motivation and action: Introduction and overview. In HeckhausenJHeckhausenH (eds) Motivation and Action. Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_1
87.
OsborneJWJonesBD. Identification with academics and motivation to achieve in school: How the structure of the self influences academic outcomes. Educ Psychol Rev2011; 23: 131–158.
88.
JamesW. The self. In: GordonCGergenKJ (eds) The Self in Social Interaction. 1. New York: Wiley, 1892/1968, pp.41–49.
89.
EstrieganaRMedina-MerodioJABarchinoR. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Educ2019; 135: 1–14.
90.
SingerSRHiltonMLSchweingruberHA. America’s Lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press, 2006.
91.
AsgharASladeczekIEMercierJ, et al.Learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Supporting students with learning disabilities. Can Psychol2017; 58: 238–249.
92.
BattyLReillyK. Understanding barriers to participation within undergraduate stem laboratories: Towards development of an inclusive curriculum. J Biol Educ2022; 57: 1–23.
93.
RattenV. The post covid-19 pandemic era: Changes in teaching and learning methods for management educators. Int J Manage Educ2023; 21: 100777.
94.
La BarberaFAjzenI. Author response for “moderating role of perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior: A preregistered study”. J Theor Soc Psychol2020; 5: 35–45.
95.
AgaM. The mediating role of perceived behavioral control on the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Ethiopia. J Innov Entrepreneurship2023; 12: 1–21.
HonickeTBroadbentJFuller-TyszkiewiczM. The self-efficacy and academic performance reciprocal relationship: The influence of task difficulty and baseline achievement on learner trajectory. High Educ Res Dev2023: 1–18.
98.
SchneiderMPreckelF. Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull2017; 143: 565–600.
99.
EidMKochT. The meaning of higher-order factors in reflective-measurement models. Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect2014; 12: 96–101.
100.
FanYChenJShirkeyG, et al.Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: An updated review. Ecol Process2016; 5: 1–12.
101.
WoodyE. An SEM perspective on evaluating mediation: What every clinical researcher needs to know. J Exp Psychopathol2011; 2: 210–251.
102.
RaoNJ. Outcome-based education: An outline. High Educ Future2020; 7: 5–21.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
