The paper presents an integrated approach to suspension design with educational purposes. A dedicated design tool was created to instruct automotive engineering students in the whole process of suspension design across the various CAE tools involved, from early kinematics studies to CAD, vehicle dynamics simulations and FEM modelling. The tool has given birth to a proven design procedure that the authors would like to share in this paper with focus on the educational side, although suspension kinematics design is not certainly a novel subject in itself. The tool includes geometries like the widely used McPherson strut, complex five-link schemes for high-end road cars, and typical racing car geometries like the so-called push/pull rod systems used on Formula 1 and Le Mans racecars. It has been applied successfully to various projects developed by professionals as well as by students, including the latest three Formula SAE (FSAE) single-seaters of the University of Brescia (Brescia, Italy) team. The paper is structured as follows. The introduction describes the role student design competitions play in higher engineering education, and within the frame of the Automotive Engineering course at UniBS in particular. A selection of relevant bibliography on the topic is listed. The Educational scenario section deals with the specific case of the Automotive Engineering course at UniBS and the requirements posed by student competitions, also in the frame of the Dublin Descriptors, and shows how suspension design can play a pivot role in a FSAE project. The A tool for suspension kinematics: requirements, description, solution section presents the software tool in itself. The math underlying the user interface is outlined. Finally, the integration features towards other CAE tools are presented with the related advantages.
WankatPCOreoviczFS.Teaching engineering. 2nd ed. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Purdue University Press, 2015.
2.
BanduraA.Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, 1986.
3.
BanduraA.Self-efficacy: the exercise of control.
New York, NY:
W.H. Freeman, 1997.
4.
SiddiqueZHardréPLBradshawACet al. Fostering innovation through experiential learning. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference IDETC/CIE 2010, 15–18 August 2010, Montreal, Canada.
5.
KolbD.Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 1984.
6.
KolbAYKolbDA.Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ2005;
4: 93–212.
7.
MillerGA.The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev1956;
63: 81–97.
8.
WickendenPWStobartRK. An evaluation of formula SAE in the context of the UK engineering education: culture, money and space. In: SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, 2007. SAE paper 2007-01-1051.
9.
De JuanADel RinconAFet al.
Enhancement of mechanical engineering degree through student design competition as added value. Considerations and viability. J Eng Des2016;
27: 568–589.
10.
TrowlerP.Policy and change: academic development units and the Bologna Declaration. Int J Acad Develop2004;
9: 195–200.
11.
Three-Cycle System in Topics. European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process official web site, www.ehea.info (accessed Feb 2018).
12.
KehmBM.Quality in European higher education: the influence of the Bologna process. Change: Magazine Higher Learn2010;
42: 40–46.
13.
GadolaMChindamoD. Experiential learning in engineering education: the role of Student Design Competitions and a case study. Int J Mech Eng Educ 2017; 47: 3–22.
14.
BeniniCGadolaMChindamoDet al.
The influence of suspension components friction on race car vertical dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dynam2017;
55: 338–350.
15.
ChindamoDGadolaMArmellinDet al. BikeShake: the design of an indoor simulator dedicated to motorcycle ride testing as an interactive project. Int J Interact Des Manuf2017 ; 12: 1371–1383.
16.
ChindamoDGadolaMArmellinDet al.
Design of an indoor simulator for motorcycle applications. Appl Sci2017;
7: 1220
17.
ChindamoDGadolaM.Reproduction of real-world road profiles on a four-poster rig for indoor vehicle chassis and suspension durability testing. Adv Mech Eng2017;
9: 1–10.
18.
ChindamoDEconomouJTGadolaMet al.
A neurofuzzy-controlled power management strategy for a series hybrid electric vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2014;
228: 1034–1050.
19.
GadolaMChindamoD. Estimation of vehicle side-slip angle using an artificial neural network. Accepted for the Conference Proceedings of ICMAA 2018 – 2nd International conference on mechanical, aeronautical and automotive engineering, Singapore, 24–26 Feb 2018.
20.
CremaCDepariAFlamminiAet al. Smartphone-based system for vital parameters and stress conditions monitoring for non-professional racecar drivers. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE SENSORS, 7370521, Busan, South Korea, 1–4 Nov 2015.
21.
GrittiGPeveradaFOrlandiSet al. Mechanical steering gear internal friction: effects on the drive feel and development of an analytic experimental model for its prediction. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on mechanics, design engineering & advanced manufacturing (JCM), Catania, Italy, 14–16 Sept 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_35.
22.
ChindamoDGadolaMRomanoM.Simulation tool for optimization and performance prediction of a generic hybrid electric series powertrain. Int J Automotive Technol2014;
15: 135–144.
23.
CecchelSChindamoDet al.
Impact of reduced mass of light commercial vehicles on fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, air quality, and socio-economic costs. Sci Total Environ2018;
613–614: 409–417.
24.
CecchelSChindamoDCollottaMet al. Lightweighting in automotive: cradle- to-grave life cycle assessment of a safety relevant component. Int J Life Cycle Assess2018; 23: 2043–2054.
25.
MarchesinFPBarbosaRSAlvesMALet al. Upright mounted pushrod: the effects on racecar handling dynamics. The dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. In: Proceedings of the 24th symposium of the international association for vehicle system dynamics, IAVSD 2015, Graz, Austria, 17–21 Aug 2016, pp.543–552.
26.
Dal BiancoNLotRGadolaM. Minimum time optimal control simulation of a GP2 race car. In: Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2017; 232: 1180–1195.
GadolaMChindamoD.The mechanical limited-slip differential revisited: high-performance and racing car applications. Int J Appl Eng Res2018;
13: 1478–1495.
29.
HuwCD.Integrating a multi-university design competition into a mechanical engineering design curriculum using modern design pedagogy. J Eng Des2012;
24: 383–396.
30.
WilliamsonK.Communication and knowledge management with the University of Queensland Formula SAE Team. Honours Thesis, The University of Queensland, 2004.
31.
GadolaMCambiaghiD. Racecar suspension kinematics design: a report on the tool developed at the University of Brescia. Internal paper, University of Brescia, Italy, 1994.
32.
GadolaMCambiaghiD. MMGB: a computer-based approach to racing car suspension design. ATA – Ingegneria Automotoristica, 6/7, 1994.
33.
GadolaMCambiaghiD. Computer-aided racing car suspension design and development at the University of Brescia, Italy. In: 1994 SAE motorsports engineering conference. SAE Technical Paper 942507. 1994.
34.
CandelpergherAGadolaMVetturiD. Development of a new software for racecar suspension kinematics. In: 2002 SAE motorsport engineering conference, 2002. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-3346.
MartiniAUrsellaA. Elaborazione di un modello di cinematismo per sospensione automobilistica a bracci multipli. Degree Thesis in Mechanical Engineering, University of Brescia, 2002.
37.
HillerMWoernleC. Elasto-Kinematical analysis of a five-point wheel suspension. Revue de la SIA, Ingenieurs de l’Automobile. Paris 1985, pp.77–80, 1985.
38.
KnapczykJDzierzekS. Displacement analysis of five-rod wheel-guiding mechanism by using vector method. In: Proceedings of the 25th ISATA, Florence, Italy, 1–5 Jun 1992. vol. Mechatronics, paper 920893, pp.687–695.
39.
KnapczykJDzierzekS.Displacement and force analysis of five-rod suspension with flexible joints. TransJ Mech Des. 1995;
117: 532–538.
40.
KnapczykJDzierzekS. Position–force synthesis of five-rod suspension mechanism. In: 10th IFToMM world congress on the theory of machines and mechanisms, Oulu, Finland, 20–24 June 1999, pp.671–676.
41.
TotuVAlexandruC.Multi-criteria kinematic optimization of a front multi-link suspension mechanism using DOE screening and regression model. Appl Mech Mater2013;
332: 351–356.
42.
AngroschBPloechlMReinalterW.Suspension design by means of numerical sensitivity analysis and optimization. Int J Vehicle Des2014;
65: 52–72.
43.
SimionescuPA.A unified approach to the kinematic synthesis of five-link, four-link, and double-wishbone suspension mechanisms with rack-and-pinion steering control. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Automobile Eng2016;
231: 1374–1387.
44.
LegnaniG. Meccanica dei robot. Città Studi Edizioni. 1996. ISBN 978-8872591284.
45.
LegnaniG. Robotica industriale. CEA. 2003. ISBN 978-8808086310.
46.
LegnaniGFassiI.Robotics: state of the art and future trends. Nova Science Publishers, 2012. ISBN 978-1621004783.
47.
PeveradaF.Sviluppo di un’applicazione aperta in VBA per Excel per l’analisi cinematica di sospensionimultilink. Degree thesis in Mechanical Engineering, University of Brescia, 2012.
48.
DixonJC.Suspension geometry and computation. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009. ISBN 978-0470510216.
