This paper examines engineering students’ misconceptions of thermodynamics. A summary of the pedagogical theories of misconceptions is presented and the cognitive roots of misconceptions are briefly reviewed. Concept tests are discussed as one of the most effective tools for diagnosing misconceptions, followed by a summary of the available thermodynamics concept tests. Finally, an overview is presented of the most frequent thermodynamics misconceptions among engineering students.
HolyoakKJMorrisonRGE.Concepts and categories: memory, meaning, and metaphysics.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
3.
PrinceMVigeantMNottisK.Development of the heat and energy concept inventory: preliminary results on the prevalence and persistence of engineering students misconceptions. J Eng Educ2012;
101: 412–438.
4.
ChiM.Three types of conceptual change: belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In: VosniadouS (ed) Handbook of research on conceptual change.
Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum, 2008, pp.61–82.
5.
ChiM.Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. J Learn Sci2005;
14: 161–199.
6.
SreenivasuluaBSubramaniambR.University students understanding of chemical thermodynamics. Int J Sci Educ2013;
35: 601–635.
7.
TurányiTTothZ.Hungarian university students’ misunderstandings in thermodynamics and chemical kinetics. Chem Educ Res Pract2013;
14: 105–116.
8.
di SessaA.Towards an epistemology of physics. Cogn Instruc1993;
10: 105–225.
9.
National Research Council. Misconceptions as barriers to understanding science. In: Chapter 4 in science teaching reconsidered: a handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
10.
GranvilleM.Student misconceptions in thermodynamics. J Chem Educ1985;
62: 847–848.
11.
StrevelerRMillerRSantiago-RomanAet al.
Rigorous methodology for concept inventory development: using the assessment triangle to develop and test the thermal and transport science concept inventory (ttci). Int J Eng Educ2011;
27: 968–984.
12.
HaglundJAnderssonSElmgrenM.Chemical engineering students’ ideas of entropy. Chem Educ Res Pract2015;
16: 537–551.
13.
HakeRR.Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Phys1998;
66: 64–74.
14.
JorionNGaneBJamesKet al.
An analytic framework for evaluating the validity of concept inventory claims. J Eng Educ. 2015;
104: 454–496.
15.
PellegrinoJChudowskyNGlaserRE.Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment.
Washington, DC:
National Academies Press, 2011.
16.
MidkiffKLitzingerTEvansDL.Development of engineering thermodynamics concept inventory instruments. In: 31st ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. reno, Nv, 2001.
17.
MillerRStrevelerRYangDet al.
Identifying and repairing student misconceptions in thermal and transport science: concept inventories and schema training studies. Chem Eng Educ2011;
45: 203–210.
18.
StrevelerROldsBMillerRet al. Using a delphi study to identify the most difficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE annual conference and exposition, 2003.
19.
LewisLELinnCM.Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults and experts: implications for curricular improvements. J Res Sci Teach2003;
40: 155–175.
20.
NilssonTNieddererH.Undergraduate students conceptions of enthalpy, enthalpy change and related concepts. Chem Educ Res Prac2014;
15: 336–353.
21.
GoedhartMKaperW.From chemical energetics to chemical thermodynamics. In: GilbertJKDe JongOJustiRet al. (eds) Chemical education: towards research-based practice.
Dordrecht:
Kluwer, 2002, pp.339–362.
22.
CarsonEWatsonJ.Undergraduate students understandings of entropy and gibbs free energy. Univ Chem Educ2002;
6: 4–12.
23.
KaperWGoedhartM.Forms of energy, an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? – part i. Int J Sci Educ2002;
24: 81–95.
24.
JewettJW.Energy and the confused student iii: language. Phys Teach2008;
46: 149–153.
25.
ChinnCBrewerW.The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Rev Educ Res1993;
63: 1–49.
26.
PrinceMVigeantM, andNottisK.Repairing student misconceptions in heat transfer using inquiry-based activities. Chem Eng Educ2016;
50: 52–61.
27.
BernhardJ. Improving engineering physics teaching – learning from physics education research. In: Physics teaching in engineering education conference, Budapest, Hungary, 2000.
28.
SteinbergMBrownDClementJ.Genius is not immune to persistent misconceptions: conceptual difficulties impeding isaac newton and contemporary physics students. Int J Sci Educ1990;
12: 265–273.
29.
CarvalhoPSampaio e SousaA.Should we use colours as symbolic representations of hot and cold?Phys Educ2006;
41: 263–266.
