Self-generated exam activity was implemented in second year undergraduate students of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering degree to promote engagement. The activity was demonstrated to be effective regarding enhancement of learning outcomes through the promotion of deep learning and partnership through cooperative and collaborative work. Results indicated that ∼80% of the students engaged with the activity and were satisfied with the learning outcomes. In general, students (>80%) perceived themselves as co-creators and co-owners of the self-generated exam. Results also showed that academic staff encouragement and motivation affects students’ co-creation and that students are satisfied when involved in their learning process.
BiggsJ.Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does. 2nd ed.
The Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 2003.
3.
VermuntJ.The power of teaching learning environments to influence students learning. BJEP monograph, Series II, No 4. Students Learning and University Teaching, 2007; 18, pp.73–89.
4.
BloomB.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Cognitive Domain, Vol 1. New York, USA, 1956.
5.
KolbDA.Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984; p.38.
6.
FelderRMSilvermanLK. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engr. Education, 1988
7.
MartonF.SäljöR. “On qualitative differences in learning – I: outcome and process”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976;
46: 4–11.
8.
WengerE. Community of Practice, Learning. Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, UK, 1998.
9.
Shulmanl.Signature Pedagogies in the Professions.Daedalus, 2005;
134(3), 53–59.
Cook-SatherBovil, CFeltenP. Engaging students as partners in teaching and learning: A guide for faculty.
San Francisco, CA,
Josey-Bass, 2014.
12.
BovillC.Sharing responsibility for learning through formative evaluation: moving to evaluation as learning. Pract Evid Scholar Teach Learn High Educ2011;
6: 96–109.
13.
BovillCMorssKBulleyCJ.Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion arising from a first year curriculum design project and a literature review. Pedag Res Maxim Educ2009;
3: 17–26.
RibesGGPeraltRA.Structural equation modeling of co-creation and its influence on the student’s satisfaction and loyalty towards university.J Comput Appl Math2016;
291: 257–263.
