Traditional approaches in engineering product development are not suited to resource-constrained rural villages, as these contexts are complex and very different. There are language barriers, social and cultural differences, lack of infrastructure and limited access to electricity and other basic amenities. This led us to explore a number of engineering projects undertaken for these under-served markets. Our results indicate that a new approach that is more collaborative and one that is community-based is required.
Austin-Breneman J and Yang M. Design for micro-enterprise: an approach to product design for emerging markets. In: The international design engineering technical conference, Portland, Oregan, USA, 4 August 2013.
2.
OzerM. New product development in Asia: an introduction to the special issue. Ind Market Manage2006; 35: 252–261.
3.
ChandraMNeelankavilJ. Product development and innovation for developing countries: potential and challenges. J Manage Dev2008; 27: 1017–1025.
4.
PayaudMA. Marketing strategies at the bottom of the pyrimad: examples from nestle, danone and proctor & gamble. Global Business and Organizational Excellence2014; January/February: 33: 51–63.
5.
MurcottS. Co-evolutionary design for development: influences shaping engineering design and implementation in Nepal and the global village. J Int Dev2007; 19: 123–144.
6.
Bingham GA, Whitehead T and Evans MA. Design tool for enhanced new product development in low income economies. In: Lloyd P and Bohemia E (eds.) Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society – Future-Focused Thinking, vol. 6, 2016, pp. 2241–2256. DOI: 10.21606/drs.2016.224.
7.
SianiparCPMYudokoGDowakiK. Design methodology for appropriate technology: engineering as if people mattered. J Sustainability2013; 5: 3382–3425.
8.
BurgessSSteenkampJ. Marketing renaissance: how research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. Int J Res Market2006; 23: 337–356.
9.
NakataCWeidnerK. Enhancing new product adoption at the base of the pyramid: a contextualized model. J Prod Innov Manage2012; 29: 21–32.
10.
RabinoS. The bottom of the pyramid: an integrative approach. Int J Emerg Market2013; 10: 2–15.
11.
HussainSSandersEB-NSteinertM. Participatory design with marginalized people in developing countries: challenges and opportunities experienced in a field study in Cambodia. Int J Des2012; 6: 1–6.
12.
ViswanathanMSridharanS. Product development for the BoP: Insights on concept and prototype development from university-based student projects in India. J Prod Innov Manage2012; 29: 51–68.
13.
Schafer C, Parks R and Rai R. Design for emerging bottom of the pyramid markets: a product service system (PSS) based approach. In: ASME 2011 International design engineering technical conference, Washington DC, USA, 1 January 2011, pp. 1019–1031. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
14.
HussainSSandersEB-N. Fusion of horizons: co-designing with Cambodian children who have prosthetic legs, using generative design tools. CoDesign2012; 8: 43–79.
15.
ChakravarthyBCoughlanS. Emerging market strategy: innovating both products and delivery systems. Strat Leadership2012; 40: 27–32.
16.
Sanders EB-N, Brandt E and Binder T. A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: The proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference, 29 November 2010, pp. 195–198. ACM.
EWB. EWB Challenge students provide humanitarian engineering solutions to global issues 2016, www.ewb.org.au/announcements/639/11523 (accessed 11 September 2016).
