The present work explores the research question: do capstone engineering students perceive that different learning and teaching modes improve their referencing and citation skills? Two different teaching and learning modes of instruction were implemented for demonstration and training on the use of engineering databases and bibliographic information retrieval resources: i.e. small group and large group. A survey was conducted of students’ perception of the mode of instruction in both a large class format and the small-class hands-on environment. Analysis of the survey data yielded an overall positive response from students to the implementation of computerised bibliographic software for both class formats. However, this study found compelling evidence that students highly value the intensive instruction in a small group to assist them in improving their use and understanding of citations in written documentation.
Feldmann L and Feldmann J. Developing information literacy skills in freshmen engineering technology students. In: 30th Annual frontiers in education FIE, 2000, pp. S2E1/-S2E/4. Kansas, MO: IEEE.
2.
FernstenLARedaM. Helping students meet the challenges of academic writing. Teach Higher Educ2011; 16: 171–182.
3.
McelroyAR. Information studies for Engineers. Eur J Eng Educ1991; 16: 247–255.
4.
MartinRMaythamBCaseJ. Engineering graduates perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. J Eng Educ2005; 30: 167–180.
5.
NguyenDQ. The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: a comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global J Eng Educ1998; 2: 65–75.
6.
SageevPRomanowskiC. A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of survey on technical communication skills. J Eng Educ2001; 90: 685–693.
7.
Engineers Australia. Stage 1 competency standard for professional engineer. 2012.
8.
TheEngineering Council. UK standard for professional engineering competence, London: The Engineering Council, 2013.
9.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, Baltimore, MD: ABET, 2013.
10.
European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. EUR-ACE framework standards for the accreditation of engineering programmes, Brussels: EUR-ACE, 2008.
11.
MaleSA. Generic engineering competencies: A review and modelling approach. Educ Res Perspect2010; 37: 25–51.
12.
MaleSABushMBMurrayK. Think engineer, think male?Eur J Eng Educ2009; 34: 455–464.
13.
NorbackJSLeedsEMForehandGA. Engineering communication-executive perspectives on the necessary skills for students. Int J Modern Eng2009; 10: 11–19.
14.
ChenLC. A study on integrating information literacy into undergarduates’ learning inquiry. J Educ Media Library Sci2008; 46: 233–266.
WeissbergRBukerS. Writing up research: experimental research report writing for students of English, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990, pp. 201.
17.
YuFSullivanJWoodallL. What can students’ bibliographies tell us?-Evidence based information skills teaching for engineering students. Evidence Based Library Inform Pract2006; 1: 12–22.
18.
IbehCC. ‘Research, report writing, and representation’: The most viable 3Rs for critical thinking and effective communication skills in SMET education, Albuquerque, NM: ASEE, 2001.
19.
KuHGohS. Final year engineering projects in Australia and Europe. Eur J Eng Educ2010; 35: 161–173.
20.
OlsenJKCoonsBCornell University’s information literacy program. In: MenschingGEMenschingTB (eds). Coping with information illiteracy: bibliographic instruction for the information age, Ann Arbor, MI: Pieran Press, 1989, pp. 7–20.
21.
WertzREPurzerŞFosmireMJ. Assessing information literacy skills demonstrated in an engineering design task. J Eng Educ2013; 102: 577–602.
22.
HutchingsJWilleyM. Resilience and Redirection: information literacy in Louisana higher education. Libraries Acad2014; 14: 239–253.
23.
KrishnanLAKathpaliaSS. Literature reviews in student project reports. IEEE Trans Profession Commun2002; 45: 187–197.
24.
BrasleySS. Effective librarian and discipline faculty collaboration models for integrating information literacy into the fabric of an academic institution. New Direct Teach Learn2008; 2008: 71–88.
25.
Choi Y and Rasmussen E. What is needed to educate future digital librarians: A study of current practice and staffing patterns in academic and research libraries. D-Lib Magaz 2006; 12.
26.
RajuJ. Knowledge and skills for the digital era library academic. J Acad Librarian2014; 40: 163–170.
27.
BawdenD. Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. J Document2001; 57: 218–259.
28.
NonthacumjaneP. Key skills and competencies of a new generation of LIS professionals. IFLA J2011; 37: 280–288.
29.
BruwerMBlicblauASDiniK. Managing information for capstone engineering projects. AAEE, Melbourne, Australia: Engineers Australia, 2012, pp. 1130.
30.
Thomson Reuters. ENDNOTE. Thomson Reuters, 2013.
31.
Bibtex. Describe and process lists of references. Alexander Feder, 2014.
RefWorks. RefWorks-an online research management, writing and collaboration tool. ProQuest, 2009.
34.
APA. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 2010.
35.
ClasonDLDormodyTJ. Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. J Agric Educ1994; 35: 31–35.
36.
IBM. SPSS statistics standard V19.0, 19.0 ed. Armonk, NY: International Business Machines Corporation, 2012.
37.
SamsonS. Information literacy learning outcomes and student success. J Acad Librarian2010; 36: 202–210.
38.
HulsePGeorgeJSLiW. How well does collaboration work in engineering project curriculum redesign?, Austin, TX: ASEE, 2009.
39.
Cochrane S, Goh SC and Ku HS. An investigation into the application of research strategies in the final-year undergraduate engineering and surveying projects. In: AAEE: Engineering the curriculum. Adelaide, Australia, 2009, pp. 193–198.
40.
HuckinTNOlsenLa. Technical writing and professional communication for nonnative speakers of English, 2nd ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1991, pp. 719.
41.
ErdmannCHardingB. Leveraging the internet and limited on campus resources to teach information literacy skills to future engineering practitioners, Louisville, KY: ASEE, 2010.
42.
MohlerBA. Citation analysis as an assessment tool. Sci Technol Libraries2005; 25: 57–64.
43.
Bowles-TerryMSchmidtL. Embedded assessment of library learning outcomes in a freshman engineering course, Vancouver, Canada: ASEE, 2011. , pp.AC 2011-541.
