Abstract
This article reconsiders C.L.R. James and Claudia Jones as theorists of totality whose work exposed foundational limits within mid-twentieth-century Marxism, liberal anti-colonialism and metropolitan feminism. Rather than treating race, class and gender as analytically separable or politically sequential problems, James and Jones insisted that capitalism, empire and heteropatriarchy form an integrated system whose contradictions can only be confronted through unified analysis and struggle. Reading them in dialectical relation, the article develops what we term the totality problem, that is, the persistent difficulty of accommodating such integrated critique within dominant traditions of political thought. Situating their work initially within the Caribbean experience and tracing its subsequent movement, marginalisation and partial incorporation during the second half of the twentieth century, the piece argues that James and Jones offer a method for analysing domination and imagining decolonial humanism beyond the limits of liberal universalism.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
On James’s 1938 meeting with Trotsky in Mexico, see K. Worcester, C.L.R. James: A political biography (State University of New York Press, 1996), 53–6. James’s critique of Trotsky’s understanding of colonial revolution appears throughout his correspondence and later writings, though he maintained respect for Trotsky’s theoretical contributions.
2.
On the rejection of Jones’s essay by the British Communist Party and its eventual publication in Political Affairs , see C. B. Davies, Left of Karl Marx: The political life of Black Communist Claudia Jones (Duke University Press, 2008), 92–5. See also B. Johnson, I Think of My Mother: Notes on the life and times of Claudia Jones (Karia Press, 1984), published by the Trinidadian community press he founded, the first sustained effort to reclaim Jones’s political significance for British readers, and it foregrounded Jones’s essay “An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman” decades before that text entered mainstream scholarly discussion.
3.
S. Wynter, “Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument,” CR: The New Centennial Review 3, no. 3 (2003): 260.
4.
By “totality,” we do not mean a closed or harmonised system, nor a teleological philosophy of history that resolves contradiction into unity. Rather, totality here names a problem of the persistent difficulty of grasping how capitalism, racial domination and heteropatriarchy operate as an integrated but antagonistic social formation. It is a negative and diagnostic concept, oriented toward exposing the limits of partial analysis rather than supplying a synthetic solution. In this sense, James’s and Jones’s work aligns less with totalising system-building than with a critical tradition that treats totality as fractured, conflictual and historically unstable.
5.
On the Caribbean as laboratory of colonial modernity, see M.-R. Trouillot, Silencing the Past: Power and the production of history (Beacon Press, 1995), 70–107.
6.
C. L. R. James, “The Atlantic slave trade and slavery: Some interpretations of their significance in the development of the United States and the Western World,” in The Future in the Present: Selected writings , ed. C. L. R. James (Allison & Busby, 1977).
7.
É. Glissant, Poetics of Relation , trans. B. Wing (University of Michigan Press, 1997), 144.
8.
C. L. R. James, The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo revolution (Secker and Warburg, 1938), 18.
9.
C. Jones, “The Caribbean community in Britain,” Freedomways 4, no. 3 (1964): 341–57.
10.
P. Gilroy, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness (Harvard University Press, 1993).
11.
On standpoint epistemology and the Caribbean, see A. Bogues, Black Heretics, Black Prophets: Radical political intellectuals (Routledge, 2003), 104–127.
12.
On James’s transnational trajectory, see A. L. Nielsen, C.L.R. James: A critical introduction (University Press of Mississippi, 1997), 1–23.
13.
C. L. R. James, “Russia and Marxism,” in The C.L.R. James Reader , ed. A. Grimshaw (Blackwell, 1992), 239–44.
14.
C. Jones, “I was deported because I fought the color bar,” in I Think of My Mother: Notes on the life and times of Claudia Jones , ed. B. Johnson (Karia Press, 1984).
15.
Davies, Left of Karl Marx , 145–68.
16.
On Jones’s founding of the West Indian Gazette and the Caribbean Carnival, see B. Schwarz, “Claudia Jones and the West Indian Gazette: Reflections on the emergence of post-colonial Britain,” Twentieth Century British History 14, no. 3 (2003): 264–85. The Caribbean Carnival Jones organised in 1959 took place in St Pancras Town Hall and subsequent ones in central London venues. Carnival did not move to the streets of Notting Hill until 1966, when community activist Rhaune Laslett instigated it there.
17.
On critiques of centre-periphery models, see C. J. Robinson, Black Marxism: The making of the Black radical tradition (Zed Press, 1983), 9–28.
18.
C. L. R. James, World Revolution 1917–1936: The rise and fall of the Communist International (Humanities Press, 1992).
19.
C. Jones, “We seek full equality for women,” in Claudia Jones: Beyond containment , ed. C. B. Davies (Ayebia Clarke Publishing, 2011).
20.
James, The Black Jacobins , 18.
21.
On James’s reading of Hegel’s master–slave dialectic through the Haitian Revolution, see D. Scott, Conscripts of Modernity: The tragedy of colonial enlightenment (Duke University Press, 2004), 112–42.
22.
The term ‘insurgent materialism’ draws on Robinson’s concept of the Black radical tradition as fundamentally challenging Eurocentric Marxism. See Robinson, Black Marxism , 2–4.
23.
C. L. R. James, Notes on Dialectics: Hegel, Marx, Lenin (Friends of Facing Reality, 1948).
24.
C. Jones, “An end to the neglect of the problems of the Negro woman!,” Political Affairs 28, no. 6 (1949): 51.
25.
On Jones’s theorisation of super-exploitation, see E. S. McDuffie, Sojourning for Freedom: Black women, American communism, and the making of Black left feminism (Duke University Press, 2011), 158–67.
26.
Jones, “An end to the neglect,” 54.
27.
On the global dimensions of reproductive labour, see A. Y. Davis, Women, Race & Class (Random House, 1981), 90–109.
28.
On the institutional Left’s rejection of James and Jones, see Worcester, C.L.R. James: A political biography , 78–96; Davies, Left of Karl Marx , 118–44.
29.
Worcester, C.L.R. James: A political biography , 88; Davies, Left of Karl Marx , 145–68.
30.
James, “Russia and Marxism,” 239–44.
31.
Jones, “We seek full equality for women,” 85–7.
32.
C. L. R. James, Beyond a Boundary (Hutchinson, 1963).
33.
James, Beyond a Boundary , preface.
34.
James, Beyond a Boundary , 87–103.
35.
James, Beyond a Boundary , 28–52.
36.
Schwarz, “Claudia Jones and the West Indian Gazette,” 275–8.
37.
Glissant, Poetics of Relation , 189.
38.
On Carnival’s tensions between resistance and commodification, see Schwarz, “Claudia Jones and the West Indian Gazette,” 280–83.
39.
On James’s pedagogical practices, see S. R. Cudjoe and W. E. Cain, eds., C.L.R. James: His intellectual legacies (University of Massachusetts Press, 1995), 89–112.
40.
Davies, Left of Karl Marx , 185–98.
41.
James, Notes on Dialectics , 115–53.
42.
On the colonial household, see M. J. Alexander, Pedagogies of Crossing: Meditations on feminism, sexual politics, memory, and the sacred (Duke University Press, 2005), 41–65.
43.
Davis, Women, Race & Class , 90–109.
44.
On reproductive labour and capitalism, see Jones, “We seek full equality for women,” 83–5.
45.
Jones, “An end to the neglect,” 58.
46.
On contemporary abolitionist approaches to gender violence, see K.-Y. Taylor, From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation (Haymarket Books, 2016), 175–205.
47.
James, The Black Jacobins , 10–15.
48.
McDuffie, Sojourning for Freedom , 165–7.
49.
Alexander, Pedagogies of Crossing , 43–6.
50.
Jones, “An end to the neglect,” 52–60.
51.
Alexander, Pedagogies of Crossing ; G. Gopinath, Impossible Desires: Queer diasporas and South Asian public cultures (Duke University Press, 2005); J. S. Allen, ¡Venceremos?: The erotics of Black self-making in Cuba (Duke University Press, 2011).
52.
Schwarz, “Claudia Jones and the West Indian Gazette,” 283.
53.
J. Melamed, Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism (University of Minnesota Press, 2011), 1–38.
54.
On cricket and postcolonial nationalism, see S. Hall, “The formation of a diasporic intellectual: An interview with Stuart Hall,” in Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies , ed. D. Morley and K.-H. Chen (Routledge, 1996).
55.
K. E. Fields and B. J. Fields, Racecraft: The soul of inequality in American life (Verso, 2012).
56.
Jones, “An end to the neglect,” 65–6.
57.
Robinson, Black Marxism , 2–4.
58.
On the differences between Jones’s triple oppression and contemporary intersectionality, see McDuffie, Sojourning for Freedom , 158–67.
59.
On decolonial humanism, see Wynter, “Unsettling the coloniality of being,” 260–70.
60.
James, Notes on Dialectics , 116.
61.
A. Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism , trans. J. Pinkham (Monthly Review Press, 2000), 73.
62.
Jones, “We seek full equality for women,” 82.
63.
James, Notes on Dialectics , 116; Davies, Left of Karl Marx , 185–98.