Abstract
This article examines 126 cases where people were charged with criminal offences in relation to the summer 2024 riots in England. Among other dynamics, it looks at examples where people were charged for their involvement in the riots, and also in reaction to them, including those who chose to protect asylum seekers, BME communities and their institutions. It reveals how dominant, politically established anti-asylum-seeker and anti-migrant narratives were echoed in the violence and how, in some cases, criminal justice agencies followed politicians’ lead by downplaying the racist context of the riots and framing them as ‘thuggery’, thereby decontextualising what took place. It asks whether what happened in the courts echoed a dominant thesis of cumulative extremism, and shows how the crackdown on the riots swept up many vulnerable people from across different backgrounds.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
