Amid claims that forced marriage is rife in Australia’s minority communities, 2013 saw the introduction of criminal legislation outlawing forced marriage in Australia. Within public debate, this punitive measure came to overshadow all other modes of addressing the problem; for instance, education programmes, civil legislation and targeted domestic violence support services. This article examines print media coverage of forced marriage over the thirteen-year period leading up to the introduction of criminal legislation. Exploring a discourse that overwhelmingly understands forced marriage as a problem of Islam and multiculturalism, and that marginalises the experiences of women and service providers, the author identifies distinct conservative and liberal representations of forced marriage which racialise domestic violence. Conservatives maintain that forced marriage is empirical evidence of an impending Muslim ‘takeover’ of the West precipitated by multiculturalism. Liberals reassert the importance of western values through specific criminal legislation to temper male minority ethnic violence. The material consequence of these Orientalist framings is a narrowing of services available to women seeking to escape violence. The article seeks to understand the processes of meaning-making in which forced marriage is implicated and how the issue is situated within the domain of national political ideology, as opposed to family violence.
SimmonsF.BurnJ., ‘Without consent: forced marriage in Australia’, Melbourne University Law Review36 (2013), pp. 970–1008.
2.
Attorney General’s Department, ‘Forced and servile marriage’, Discussion paper (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010).
3.
SeeHendersonS., ‘Without consent’, Four Corners (ABC TV, 2April2012) and OveringtonC., ‘The wedding vow’, Australian Magazine (11February2012).
4.
BernsN., Framing the Victim: domestic violence, media and social problems (Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 2004); CarlyleK.SlaterM.ChakroffJ., ‘Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: skewing representations of risk’, Journal of Communication58 (2008), pp. 168–86; KozolW., ‘Fracturing domesticity: media, nationalism, and the question of feminist influence’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society20 (1995), pp. 646–67.
5.
Enck-WanzerS., ‘All’s fair in love and sport: Black masculinity and domestic violence in the news’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies6, no. 1 (2009), pp. 1–18;PepinJ., ‘Nobody’s business? White male privilege in media coverage of intimate partner violence’, Sociological Spectrum36, no. 3 (2016), pp. 123–41.
6.
RazackS., ‘Imperilled Muslim women, dangerous Muslim men and civilised Europeans: legal social responses to forced marriage’, Feminist Legal Studies12 (2004), pp. 129–74; LenonS., ‘Hidden hegemonies of the rainbow: the racialized scaffolding of forced marriage and civil partnership in the UK’, Journal of Intercultural Studies33, no. 3 (2012), pp. 275–87; DustinM.PhillipsA., ‘Whose agenda is it? Abuses of women and abuses of “culture” in Britain’, Ethnicities8, no. 3 (2008), pp. 405–24.
7.
AnithaS.GillA., ‘The social construction of forced marriage and its “victim” in media coverage and crime policy discourses’, in GillA.AnithaS., eds, Forced Marriage: introducing a social justice and human rights perspective (London/New York: Zed Books, 2011).
8.
AnithaS.GillA., ‘A moral panic? The problematisation of forced marriage in British newspapers’, Violence Against Women21, no. 9 (2015), pp. 1123–44.
GangoliG.ChantlerK.HesterM.SingletonA., ‘Understanding forced marriage: definitions and realities’, in GillAnitha, eds, Forced Marriage.
12.
Gangoliet al., ‘Understanding forced marriage’; PhillipsA.DustinM., ‘UK initiatives on forced marriage: regulation, dialogue and exit’, Political Studies52 (2004), pp. 531–51; AnithaS.GillA., ‘Coercion, consent and the forced marriage debate in the UK’, Feminist Legal Studies17 (2009), pp. 165–84.
13.
PhillipsDustin, ‘UK initiatives on forced marriage’.
14.
AnithaGill, ‘Coercion, consent and the forced marriage debate in the UK’.
15.
GillA., ‘The pros and cons of criminalisation of forced marriage’, Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse Newsletter31 (Winter2012), p. 9.
16.
Ashiana Network, cited in Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee, Parliament of Australia ‘Marriage visa classes’, Official Committee Hansard (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010), p. 41.
17.
GangoliG.RazakA.McCarryM., ‘Forced marriages and domestic violence among South Asian communities in North East England’ (Newcastle and Bristol: Northern Rock Foundation and University of Bristol, 2006); GangoliG.McCarryM., ‘Criminalising forced marriage’, Criminal Justice Matters74, no. 1 (2008), pp. 44–46; Gill, ‘The pros and cons of criminalisation of forced marriage’.
18.
WilsonA.,‘The forced marriage debate and the British state’, Race & Class49, no. 1 (2007), p. 34.
19.
GillAnithaS., ‘The illusion of protection? An analysis of forced marriage legislation and policy in the UK’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law31, no. 3 (2009), p. 266.
20.
Gill and Anitha, ‘The illusion of protection?’, p. 265.
21.
Muslim Legal Network, ‘Response to discussion paper – forced and servile marriages: submission to Attorney-General’s Department’ (25February2011).
LentinA.TitleyG., The Crises of Multiculturalism (London/New York: Zed Books, 2011).
28.
PoyntingS.MasonV., ‘The new integrationism, the state and Islamophobia: retreat from multiculturalism in Australia’, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice36, no. 4 (2008), pp. 230–46.
29.
Ye’orB., Eurabia: the Euro-Arab axis (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005).
30.
Ye’orB., Eurabia; FallaciO., The Force of Reason (New York: Rizzoli International Publications, 2003).
31.
PipesD., ‘Europe or Eurabia?’, The Australian, 15April2008.
32.
PipesD., ‘How the West could lose’, New York Sun, 26December2006.
33.
CarrM., ‘You are now entering Eurabia’, Race Class 48, no.1 (2008), pp. 1–22; LiogierR., Le Mythe de l’islamisation: essai sur une obsession (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2012).
This use of the ‘hero’ is reminiscent of the analysis put forward by the Victorian conservative historian Thomas Carlyle.
36.
BurkeJ., ‘Secrets and lies that doomed a radical liberal’, The Observer, 21May2006.
37.
OkinS. M., ed., Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).
38.
BenhabibS., The Claims of Culture: equality and diversity in the global era (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), p. 103.
39.
NussbaumM., ‘A plea for difficulty’, in Okin, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?; An-Na’imA., ‘Promises we should all keep in common cause’, in Okin, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?
40.
Razack, ‘Imperilled Muslim women, dangerous Muslim men and civilised Europeans’, p. 152.
41.
VolppL., ‘Feminism versus multiculturalism’, Columbia Law Review101, no. 5 (2001), p. 1192.
42.
Abu-LughodL., Do Muslim Women Need Saving? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).
43.
Abu-Lughod, Do Muslim Women Need Saving?, p. 90.
44.
JacobsR., Race, Media, and the Crisis of Civil Society from Watts to Rodney King (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 11.
45.
HallS.CritcherT.JeffersonJ.ClarkeJ.RobertsB., Policing the Crisis (London: Macmillan1978), p. 66.
46.
SaidE., Orientalism (London: Penguin, 2003).
47.
Said, Orientalism.
48.
PhillipsDustin, ‘UK Initiatives on forced marriage’.
49.
SpivakG.,‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in WilliamsP.ChrismanL., eds, Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: a reader (Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994), p. 93.
50.
AhmedL., Women and Gender in Islam: historical roots of a modern debate (New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press, 1992); MohantyC. T., Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991); YegenogluM., Colonial Fantasies: towards a feminist reading of Orientalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
51.
AyotteK.HusainM., ‘Securing Afghan women: neocolonialism, epistemic violence, and the rhetoric of the veil’, NWSA Journal17, no. 3 (2005), pp. 112–33.
52.
AnithaGill, ‘A moral panic? The problematisation of forced marriage in British newspapers’, p. 1133.
53.
FeketeL., ‘Integration, Islamophobia and civil rights in Europe’ (London: Institute of Race Relations, 2008), pp. 28–32; MorsiY., Radical Skin, Moderate Masks: de-radicalising the Muslim and racism in post-racial societies (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2017).
Hussein, ‘Islamophobia will not help to end Muslim forced marriages’.
58.
GangoliMcCarry, ‘Criminalising forced marriage’.
59.
BalibarE., ‘Is there a “neo-racism”?’, in BalibarE.WallersteinI., Race, Nation, Class: ambiguous identities (London: Verso, 1991), pp. 17–28.
60.
GoldbergD., The Threat of Race: reflections on racial neoliberalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2009); HesseB., ‘Self-fulfilling prophecy: the post-racial horizon’, South Atlantic Quarterly110, no. 1 (2011), pp. 155–78; LentinA., ‘Post-race, post-politics: the paradoxical rise of culture after multiculturalism’, Ethnic and Racial Studies37, no. 8 (2014), pp. 1268–85.
61.
LentinA., ‘Racism in public or public racism: doing anti-racism in “post-racial” times’, Ethnic and Racial Studies39, no. 1
(2016), pp. 33–48.
