This article presents a critical analysis of the Danish press coverage of the referendum called by the Left-led coalition government of Greece in July 2015, concerning the future of austerity policies. It focuses on the conservative daily press of Denmark, one of the ‘core’ EU countries, writing on developments in the periphery. Three main themes emerge in the study’s discourse analysis of Berlingske Tidende’s and Jyllands Posten’s coverage: ‘post-democratic realism’, ‘the upper-class gaze’, and ‘Orientalism and cultural racism’. The authors not only reveal the one-sided, elitist coverage by the rightwing papers at Europe’s centre but also point out how the principles of neoliberalism itself and the acceptance of austerity are being constantly reinforced by the media in a country like Denmark, which had previously been marked out for its more progressive welfare capitalism. Denmark’s turn to the Right (and to racism) alongside its biased coverage of the ‘Greferendum’ are examined here in the context of the way in which neoliberalism and its politico-social effects are now presented as both common sense and the only way forward.
HamilakisY., ‘Some debts can never be repaid: the archaeo-politics of the crisis’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies34, no. 2 (2016), pp. 27–64, p. 38; N. Bozatzis, ‘Cultural othering, banal occidentalism and the discursive construction of the “Greek crisis” in global media: a case study’, Suomen Anthropologi4, no. 12 (2016), pp. 47–71; CarastathisA., ‘Is Hellenism an Orientalism? Reflections on the boundaries of ‘Europe’ in an age of austerity’, Critical Race and Whiteness Studies10, no. 1 (2014), pp. 1–17.
3.
BoltM., ‘On the turn towards liberal state racism in Denmark’, E-flux22 (2011).
4.
Bolt, ‘On the turn towards liberal state racism in Denmark’.
5.
DardotP.LavalC., The New Way of the World: on the neoliberal society (London: Verso, 2013), p. 164.
6.
LoreyI., State of Insecurity, Government of the Precarious (London: Verso, 2015), p. 67.
7.
Lorey, State of Insecurity, Government of the Precarious, p. 64.
8.
LazzaratoM., ‘Neoliberalism in action: inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social’, Theory, Culture & Society26, no. 6 (2009), pp. 109–33, p. 111.
9.
See LentinA.TitleyG., The Crises of Multiculturalism: racism in a neoliberal age (London: Zed Books, 2011); LindekildeL., ‘The mainstreaming of far-Right discourse in Denmark’, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies12 (2014), pp. 363–82; WrenK., ‘Cultural racism: something rotten in the state of Denmark?’, Social & Cultural Geography2, no. 2 (2001), pp. 141–62, p. 141.
10.
BleichE., ‘Free speech or hate speech? The Danish cartoon controversy in the European legal context’, in KhoryK. (ed.). Global Migration: challenges in the twenty-first century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), p. 115.
11.
Wren, ‘Cultural racism: something rotten in the state of Denmark?’, p. 141.
12.
YilmazF., How the Workers became Muslims: immigration, culture, and hegemonic transformation in Europe (Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2016).
13.
AskaniusT.MylonasY., ‘The economic crisis of the EU in the media discourses of the extreme Right: the cases of Denmark and Sweden’, Javnost – The Public22, no. 1 (2015), pp. 55–72.
14.
DavidsonN., ‘Crisis neoliberalism and regimes of permanent exception’, Critical Sociology, Published ahead of print 4August2016. DOI: 10.1177/0896920516655386, p. 17.
15.
FaircloughN.FaircloughI., Political Discourse Analysis (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 7; JacobssonD., ‘Business elite competition or a common concern?’, Journalism Studies (2016), pp. 1–21, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1164615; MercilleJ., ‘The role of the media in fiscal consolidation programmes: the case of Ireland’, Cambridge Journal of Economics38, no. 2 (2014), pp. 281–300; DoudakiV., ‘Legitimation mechanisms in the bailout discourse’, Javnost –The Public22, no. 1 (2015), pp. 1–17.
16.
MylonasY., ‘Media and the economic crisis of the EU: the “culturalization” of a systemic crisis and Bild-Zeitung’s framing of Greece’, tripleC10, no. 2 (2012), pp. 646–71; MylonasY., ‘Austerity discourses in “Der Spiegel” journal, 2009–2014’, tripleC13, no. 1 (2015), pp. 248–69; VossoleJ. V., ‘Framing PIGS: patterns of racism and neocolonialism in the Euro crisis’, Patterns of Prejudice50, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1–20, DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2015.1128056.
17.
Hamilakis, ‘Some debts can never be repaid: the archaeo-politics of the crisis’, p. 232.
18.
JacobssonD.EkströmM., ‘Dismantling discourses: compassion, coping and consumption in journalistic representations of the working class’, Critical Discourse Studies13, no. 4 (2015), pp. 379–96; PerssonG., ‘Ideological struggle over epistemic and political positions in news discourse on migrant activism in Sweden’, Critical Discourse Studies13, no. 6 (2016), pp. 278–93; NikolopoulouA.CanteraL. M., ‘“Exceptional”, “normal” or a “myth”? The discursive construction of the “crisis” by Greek employees’, Discourse & Society27, no. 5 (2016), pp. 516–32; CarahN.LouwE., Media and Society: production, content and participation, (London: SAGE, 2015), p. 106.
19.
HjarvardS.Nørgaard KristensenN., ‘When media of a small nation argue for war’, Media, War & Conflict7, no. 1 (2014), pp. 51–69.
While Politiken offered eighty relevant pieces on the Greek referendum (including six cover pages), and Information forty-six (including four front-cover pages), Jyllands Posten published seventy-one (including four front-cover pages), and Berlingske Tidende ninety-four (including three front-cover pages) on the topic.
22.
In her study of the Irish 2008 referendum for the EU constitution and the Irish vote against it, K. Ross argues that on similar occasions where the citizenry votes for decisions that may threaten elite interests, the elites historically use moralistic, legalistic or simple quantifiable arguments in favour of a broader, ‘silent’ majority suppressed by a subversive minority. Nevertheless, as Ross notes ‘the power of demos is neither the power of the population, nor its majority but rather the power of anybody. Anybody is as entitled to govern as he or she is to be governed’. See RossK., ‘Democracy for sale’, in G. Agamben et al., Democracy in What State? (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), pp. 82–99, p. 86.
23.
StreeckW., How Will Capitalism End? (London: Verso, 2016), p. 137.
24.
MouzakisY.MalkoutzisN., ‘You’ve heard the Greek crisis myths, now here are some truths’, MacroPolis, Greece in Perspective (2015). Available at: http://www.macropolis.gr/?i=portal.en.the-agora.2268 (accessed 27 May 2015).
25.
Streeck, How Will Capitalism End?, p. 113.
26.
DyrbergT. B., ‘Radical and plural democracy; in defence of Right/Left public reason’, in TønderL.ThomassenL. (eds), Radical Democracy: politics between abundance and lack (Manchester: Manchester University press, 2005), pp. 167–84, p. 168; AliT., The Extreme Centre, a Warning (London: Verso, 2015).
27.
SkeggsB., Class, Self, Culture (London: SAGE, 2003), p. 99.
28.
HermanE.ChomskyN., Manufacturing Consent: the political economy of the mass media (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988), p. 29.
29.
Dardot and Laval, The New Way of the World, p. 191.
30.
Carastathis, ‘Is Hellenism an Orientalism?’, p. 5.
31.
Bozatzis ‘Cultural othering, banal occidentalism and the discursive construction of the “Greek crisis” in global media’, p. 48.
32.
As Sara Ahmed notes, ‘consumer culture involves the production of the stranger as a commodity fetish, through representations of difference’. See AhmedSara, Strange Encounters: embodied others in post-coloniality (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 114.
33.
Mylonas, ‘Austerity discourses in “Der Spiegel” journal, 2009–2014’, p
. 261.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘Average annual hours actually worked per worker’, OECDstat, (2016). Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS (accessed 16 January 2017).
36.
AdornoT.HorkheimerM., The Dialectic of the Enlightenment (London: Verso, 1997), p. 144.
DaviesW., The Limits of Neoliberalism: authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition (London: SAGE, 2014).
39.
SchwabK.Sala-i-MartínX., ‘The global competitiveness report 2016–2017’, Report, World Economic Forum Geneva
, 2016.
40.
MylonasY., ‘Crisis, austerity and opposition in mainstream media discourses of Greece’, Critical Discourse Studies11, no. 3 (2014), pp. 305–21.
41.
Such ‘help’, however, has been analysed by David Harvey as a euphemism to conceal the tightening of the chains of national debt, with the proletarianisation and ‘creative’ (or plain) destruction to follow, so that capital may overcome its crisis of growth. See HarveyD., Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism (Oxford: OUP, 2014). Thus the mainstream media plays an important role in the reproduction of a specific politico-economic system, by abolishing any alternatives to it. See JamesonF., Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), p. 205.
42.
Hamilakis, ‘Some debts can never be repaid’, p. 237.
