This is a commentary on ‘Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science’, by Harry Collins, Robert Evans, Luis Reyes-Galindo.
CollinsH.EvansR.Reyes-GalindoL. (2025). Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127241263609
2.
FrankD. M. (2019). Disagreement or denialism? ‘Invasive species denialism’ and ethical disagreement in science. Synthese, 198, 6085–6113.
3.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
4.
LewontinR. (1997). Billions and billions of demons. The New York Review of Books, 44(1), 28–32.
5.
McKieR. (2024, February3). ‘The situation has become appalling’: Fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point. The Guardian.
6.
StepanN. (1982). The idea of race in science: Great Britain, 1800-1960. Anchor.
7.
SubramaniamB. (2019). Holy science: The biopolitics of Hindu nationalism. University of Washington Press.
8.
SubramaniamB. (2024). Botany of empire: Plant worlds and the scientific legacies of colonialism. University of Washington Press.
