Ghosts,brands,and influencers: Emergent trends in scientific authorship

Abstract

This essay is about the unique role of proper nouns at the intersection of knowledge and property, both tangible and intangible. Nouns are central to any form of property and credit, from a person’s name listed on a property deed or copyright registration, to the name of an artist to whom a work is attributed, or that of a scientist after whom a discovery or theory is named. And names can also be found on the other end of the property spectrum, not as the names of authors and owners but as objects of property, as in the case of brand names. Here I trace some of the functions of these names as they move across different scenarios of knowledge-making and property-making, focusing on some of the effects those trajectories are having in the contemporary technosciences as they bring together the function of the author and that of the brand.

Keywords

authorship plagiarism ghostwriting copyright brands misconduct metrics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anekwe

(2010) Profits and plagiarism: The case of medical ghostwriting. Bioethics 24(6): 267–272.

Astbury

(1978) The renewal of the Licensing Act and its lapse in 1695. The Library 5(33): 296–322.

Biagioli

(1998) Aporias of scientific authorship. In: Biagioli

(ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 12–30.

Biagioli

(2016) Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature 535(7611): 201.

Biagioli

(2018) Quality to impact, text to metadata: Publication and evaluation in the age of metrics. KNOW 2 (2): 249–275.

Biagioli

(2019) Plagiarizing names? Trends in Chemistry 1(1): 3–5.

Bosch

Esfandiari

McHenry

(2012) Challenging medical ghostwriting in US courts. PLoS Medicine 9(1): e1001163–e1001164.

Bull

(2018) The Tradition of Hermes Trismegistus: The Egyptian Priestly Figure as a Teacher of Hellenized Wisdom. Leiden: Brill.

Chang

(2010) Collaborative production and experimental labor: Two models of dissertation authorship in the eighteenth century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41(4): 347–355.

10.

Chawla

(2016) Where was chem research conducted? Not here, say two of three listed author affiliations. Retraction Watch, 18 August 2016. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/08/18/where-was-chem-research-conducted-not-here-say-two-of-three-listed-author-affiliations/ (accessed 4 December 2020).

11.

Committee on Publication Ethics (2015) Author impersonating corresponding author without knowledge of coauthors, Case # 15-12. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/case/author-impersonating-corresponding-author-without-knowledge-coauthors (accessed 4 December 2020).

12.

Council of Trent (1848) Decree concerning the edition, and the use, of the sacred books, April 8, 1546. In: Waterworth

(ed.) (trans)The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Oecumenical Council of Trent. London: Dolman.

13.

Crama

Grabisch

Martello

(2016) A brand new cheating attempt: A case of usurped identity. 4OR 14(4): 333–336.

14.

Cullen

(1997) Ghostwriting in scientific anesthesia journals. Anesthesiology 87(2): 195–196; discussion 197.

15.

Fanelli

(2020) Pressure to publish: What effects do we see? In: Biagioli

Lippman

(eds) Gaming the Metrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–122.

16.

Fisk

(2016) Writing for Hire: Unions, Hollywood, and Madison Avenue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

17.

Foucault

(1984) What is an author? In: Rabinow P (ed.) The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 101–120.

18.

Fugh-Berman

(2005) The corporate coauthor. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20(6): 546–548.

19.

Fugh-Berman

(2010) The haunting of medical journals: How ghostwriting sold ‘HRT’. PLoS Medicine 7(9): e1000335.

20.

Ginsburg

(2005) Essay – the author’s name as a trademark: A perverse perspective on the moral right of ‘paternity’? Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 23(2): 379–390.

21.

Grassley

(2010) Ghostwriting in medical literature. Minority Staff Report, 111th Congress, United States Senate Committee on Finance, 24 June.

22.

Greene

(2007) Prescribing by Numbers: Drugs and the Definition of Disease. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

23.

Horton

(2004) The dawn of McScience. The New York Review of Books, 11 March 2004.

24.

Jirik

(2006) How Great Researchers Get by-Line, Get Paid, and Get Medicine in Trouble. Bioethics Forum: Diverse Commentary on Issues in Bioethics.

25.

Johns

(2000) The Nature of the Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

26.

Katyal

(2010) Stealth marketing and antibranding. Buffalo Law Review 58(4): 795–849.

27.

Keith

(2015) 13th retraction issued for Jesus Ange Lemus. Retraction Watch, 7 April 2016. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/04/07/author-appeared-to-use-phony-caltech-co-authors-up-to-8-retractions/ (accessed 18 August 2018).

28.

Krimsky

(2007) When conflict-of-interest is a factor in scientific misconduct. Medicine and Law 26(3): 447–463.

29.

Langdon-Neuner

(2008) Medical ghost-writing. Mens Sana Monographs 6(1): 257–273.

30.

Marcus

(2016) Author appeared to use phone Caltech co-authors, up to 8 retraction. Retraction Watch, 7 April 2016. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/04/07/author-appeared-to-use-phony-caltech-co-authors-up-to-8-retractions/ (accessed 18 August 2018).

31.

Marcus

(2020) Publisher retracts nearly two dozen articles, blocks nearly three dozen more, from alias-employing author who plagiarized. Retraction Watch, 17 September 2020. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/09/17/publisher-retracts-nearly-two-dozen-articles-blocks-nearly-three-dozen-more-from-alias-employing-author-who-plagiarized/#:~:text=My%20Tweets-,Publisher%20retracts%20nearly%20two%20dozen%20articles%2C%20blocks%20nearly%20three%20dozen,to%20the%20authors’%20own%20work (accessed 4 December 2020).

32.

Marcus

Oransky

(2016) Why fake date when you can fake a scientist? Nautilus, 24 November 2016. Available at: http://nautil.us/issue/42/fakes/why-fake-data-when-you-can-fake-a-scientist (accessed 18 August 18 2018).

33.

Méndez

(2012) El hombre que imaginaba la ciencia. El Pais, 17 March.

34.

Menell

Lemley

Merges

(2019) Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age, vol. II, 2019 edn. Berkeley, CA: Clause 8 Publishing.

35.

Merton

(1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review 22(6): 635–659.

36.

Merton

(1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810): 56–63.

37.

Minnich

(2010) The fifth lateran Council and preventive censorship of printed books. Anmali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe Di Lettere e Filosofia 2(1): 67–104.

38.

Nakassis

(2012) Counterfeiting what? Aesthetics of brandedness and brand in Tamil Nadu, India. Anthropological Quarterly 85(3): 701–721.

39.

Nelson

Sismondo

(2020) Epistemic Laundering: A Typology of Transformations. Prague: Presentation at EASST/4S.

40.

Paulus

(2016) Imposter edits journal in latest peer review scam. Retraction Watch, 4 May 2016. Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/2016/05/04/journal-editor-uses-stolen-identity-in-latest-peer-review-scam/ (accessed December 4. 2020).

41.

Proctor

(1996) Cancer Wars. New York: Basic Books.

42.

Rennie

Flanagin

(1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. The Journal of the American Medical Association 271(6): 469–471.

43.

Rennie

Yank

Emanuel

(1997) When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. The Journal of the American Medical Association 278(7): 579–585.

44.

Rose

(1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

45.

Ross

Hill

Egilman

, et al. (2008) Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. The Journal of the American Medical Association 299(15): 1800–1812.

46.

Sample

(2011) Scientists credited on ghostwritten articles ‘should be charged with fraud.’ The Guardian, 2 August 2011. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/aug/02/scientists-ghostwritten-articles-fraud.

47.

Shapin

(1989) The invisible technician. American Scientist 77(6): 554–563.

48.

Sismondo

(2009) Ghosts in the machine: Publication planning in the medical sciences. Social Studies of Science 39(2): 171–198.

49.

Sismondo

(2018) Ghost-Managed Medicine: Big Pharma’s Invisible Hands. Manchester: Mattering Press.

50.

Slattery

(2020) Scammers are gaming Spotify by faking collaborations with famous artists. OneZero, 31 May. Available at: https://onezero.medium.com/scammers-are-gaming-spotify-by-faking-collaborations-with-famous-artists-42d127e370dc (accessed 15 April 2022).

51.

Smith

(2006) Lapses at the New England Journal of Medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(8): 380–382.

52.

Steinman

Bero

Chren

, et al. (2006) Narrative review: The promotion of gabapentin: An analysis of internal industry documents. Annals of Internal Medicine 145(4): 284–293.

53.

Stern

Lemmens

(2011) Legal remedies for medical ghostwriting: Imposing fraud liability on guest authors of ghostwritten articles. PLoS Medicine 8(8): e1001070.

54.

World Association of Medical Editors (2005) Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20: 549.