JasanoffSKimSH (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva47(2): 119–146.
2.
LawlessC (2020) Assembling airspace: The Single European Sky and contested transnationalities of European air traffic management. Social Studies of Science50(4): 680–704.
3.
LawrenceC (2020) Heralds of global transparency: Remote sensing, nuclear fuel-cycle facilities, and the modularity of imagination. Social Studies of Science50(4): 508–541.
4.
LevidowLRamanS (2020) Sociotechnical imaginaries of low-carbon waste-energy futures: UK techno-market fixes displacing public accountability. Social Studies of Science50(4): 609–641.
5.
PolleriM (2020) Post-political uncertainties: Governing nuclear controversies in post-Fukushima Japan. Social Studies of Science50(4): 567–588.
6.
SchiølinK (2020) Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science50(4): 542–566.
7.
SmallmanM (2019) ‘Nothing to do with the science’: How an elite sociotechnical imaginary cements policy resistance to public perspectives on science and technology through the machinery of government. Social Studies of Science50(4): 589–608.
8.
SovacoolBBergmanNHopkinsD, et al. (2020) Imagining sustainable energy and mobility transitions: Valence, temporality, and radicalism in 38 visions of a low-carbon future. Social Studies of Science50(4): 642–679.
