Culture counts more than money: Israeli critiques of German science

Abstract

While economic investments and organizational reforms may support Germany’s scientific ambitions, its culture remains a significant influence on how those ambitions work themselves out. The study relied on interviews with 125 Israeli scientists and on responses of nineteen of their German collaborators to a questionnaire. Data analysis found four cultural priorities that – in the context of comparisons with Israeli scientific culture – respondents suggest cut short the potential of German science: privileging technology over meaning and insight, privileging hierarchy over creativity, privileging cosmos over chaos, and privileging German over English. Respondents suggest that these cultural priorities silence alternative points of view and censor young scientists, limit motivation and stifle imagination, preordain problem-solving orientations, and restrict communication flows. As they consider policy targets for 2020 and beyond, the new German government, foundation leaders, and scientists need to discuss those cultural challenges. The study calls for scholars in science and technology studies to pay more attention to national cultures as decisive factors in framing the limits and possibilities of science.

Keywords

Germany Israel national character national culture science policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(2017) The secret to Germany’s scientific excellence. Nature 549(7670): 18–22.

Alexander

(2008) Clifford Geertz and the strong program: The human sciences and cultural sociology. Cultural Sociology 2(2): 157–168.

Alexander

(2012) Trauma: A Social Theory. Malden: Polity.

Alexander

Smith

(2002) The strong program in cultural theory: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In: Turner

(ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 135–150.

Fazekas

(2006) Big Science in a Small Country. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2006/01/big-science-small-country (accessed 25 September 2017).

Beck

(2001) The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. In: Tomasi

(ed.) New Horizons in Sociological Theory and Research: The Frontiers of Sociology at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. Aldershot: Ashgate, 181–201.

Bloor

(1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bornmann

Wagner

Leydesdorff

(2018) The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? PLoS One 13(3): e0194805.

Ceaser

(2003) A genealogy of anti-Americanism. The Public Interest 2003(152): 3–18.

10.

Clarivate Analytics (2018) Global Highly Cited Researchers 2018 List Reveals Influential Scientific Researchers and Their Institutions. Available at: https://clarivate.com/blog/news/global-highly-cited-researchers-2018-list-reveals-influential-scientific-researchers-and-their-institutions/ (accessed 7 August 2019).

11.

Collins

(1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

12.

Drori

(2018) Creativity and the governance of universities: Encounters of the third kind. European Review 26(S1): S100–S113.

13.

Drori

Meyer

Ramirez

, et al. (2003) Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

14.

Dwyer

Mesak

Hsu

(2005) An exploratory examination of the influence of national culture on cross-national product diffusion. Journal of International Marketing 13(2): 1–27.

15.

Elias

(1996) The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Flink

Rogge

J-C

Roßmann

, et al. (2012) Excellence Initiative Fails to Produce Diversity. Available at: https://www.wzb.eu/en/press-release/excellence-initiative-fails-to-produce-diversity (accessed 16 May 2018).

17.

Foucault

(1971) Orders of discourse. Social Science Information 10(2): 7–30.

18.

Geertz

(2000) Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

19.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

20.

Godin

(2012) ‘Innovation studies’: The invention of a specialty. Minerva 50(4): 397–421.

21.

Halffman

(2005) Science-policy boundaries: National styles? Science & Public Policy 32(6): 457–467.

22.

Hall

(1987) Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese. New York: Anchor.

23.

Hallonsten

(2011) Growing big science in a small country: MAX-Iab and the Swedish research policy system. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 41(2): 179–215.

24.

Hayton

George

Zahra

(2002) National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 26(4): 33–52.

25.

Hofstede

(1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Hofstede

(2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

27.

Jasanoff

(2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

28.

Jasanoff

Kim

S-H

(2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146.

29.

Kahane

(1975) Informal youth organizations: A general model. Sociological Inquiry 45(4): 17–28.

30.

Karliczek

(2018) Federal Cabinet Decides to Set Up Agency to Promote Breakthrough Innovations. Available at: https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2018/20180829-gm-pm-bundeskabinett-beschliesst-agentur-zur-foerderung-von-sprunginnovationen.html (accessed 16 March 2019).

31.

Kuhn

(1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

32.

Kuipers

(2011) Her Majesty’s bicycle: On national habitus and sociological comparison. Figurations 34: 1–14.

33.

Kuipers

(2013) The rise and decline of national habitus: Dutch cycling culture and the shaping of national similarity. European Journal of Social Theory 16(1): 17–35.

34.

Kumar

(2001) Sociology and the Englishness of English social theory. Sociological Theory 19(1): 41–64.

35.

Kumar

(2006a) English and British national identity. History Compass 4(3): 428–447.

36.

Kumar

(2006b) English and French national identity: Comparisons and contrasts. Nations and Nationalism 12(3): 413–432.

37.

Kuper

(1999) Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

38.

Kuzmics

Axtmann

(2007) Authority, State and National Character: The Civilizing Process in Austria and England, 1700–1900. Surrey: Ashgate.

39.

Labi

(2012) Multibillion-Dollar Program has had Little Effect at German Universities, Report Says. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Multibillion-Dollar-Program/133103 (accessed 16 May 2018).

40.

Latour

Woolgar

(1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

41.

Le Hir

M-P

(2014) The National Habitus: Ways of Feeling French, 1789–1870. Berlin: De Gruyter.

42.

Lee

(2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 673–702.

43.

Lepenies

(2006) The Seduction of Culture in German History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

44.

Levine

(1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

45.

Liska

(2005) The myth and the meaning of science as a vocation. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 28(2): 149–164.

46.

Mennell

(2007) The American Civilizing Process. Cambridge: Polity.

47.

Newman

Nollen

(1996) Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies 27(4): 753–779.

48.

Nisbett

(2003) The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently…and Why. New York: Free Press.

49.

Nisbett

Peng

Choi

, et al. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2): 291–310.

50.

Nolan

(2005) Anti-Americanism and Americanization in Germany. Politics & Society 33(1): 88–122.

51.

Pels

(1999) Privileged nomads: On the strangeness of intellectuals and the intellectuality of strangers. Theory, Culture & Society 16(1): 63–86.

52.

Pfotenhauer

Jasanoff

(2017) Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science 47(6): 783–810.

53.

Robins

(2005) The nature of personality: Genes, culture, and national character. Science 310(5745): 62–63.

54.

Schutz

(1964) The stranger: An essay in social psychology. In: Schutz

(ed.) Collected Papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 91–105.

55.

Scimago Journal & Country Rank (2019) Germany. Available at: https://www.scimagojr.com/countrysearch.php?country=de (accessed 7 August 2019).

56.

Senor

Singer

(2009) Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle. New York: Twelve Books.

57.

Simmel

(1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe: Free Press.

58.

Sismondo

(2010) An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

59.

Sztompka

(2000) Cultural trauma: The other face of social change. European Journal of Social Theory 3(4): 449–466.

60.

Terracciano

Abdel-Khalek

Adám

, et al. (2005) National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science 310(5745): 96–100.

61.

Tiryakian

(1973) Sociological perspectives on the stranger. Soundings 56(1): 45–58.

62.

Ttopstart (n.d.) Top Performing Countries in ERC Grant Acquisition. Available at: https://www.ttopstart.com/news/top-performing-countries-in-erc-grant-acquisition (accessed 23 May 2018).

63.

Vogel

(2018) A New Merkel-Led Government could be Good News for German Science. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/new-merkel-led-government-could-be-good-news-german-science.

64.

Vogel

(2019) German Research Promised a Decade of Budget Increases. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/01/new-merkel-led-government-could-be-good-news-german-science (accessed 6 May 2019).

65.

Walker

(2001) Society and culture in sociological and anthropological tradition. History of the Human Sciences 14(3): 30–55.

66.

Weber

(1973) Max Weber on Universities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

67.

Yair

(2015a) The Germans: Cultural trauma and the Israeli habitus. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 3(2): 254–279.

68.

Yair

(2015b) The Israeli existential anxiety: Cultural trauma and the constitution of national character. Social Identities 20(4–5): 346–362.

69.

Yair

(2017) The national habitus: Steps towards reintegrating sociology and group analysis. In: Hopper

Weinberg

(eds) The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups, and Societies, Vol. 3: The Foundation Matrix Extended and Re-Configured. London: Karnac, 47–63.