The early 1980s saw a ‘paradigm change’ in how donated blood was handled and used by blood centres, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies. In Sweden, a five-year state-financed R&D programme initiated a swift modernization process, an alleged ‘revolution’ of existing blood centre practices. In this article, we use interviews and archival material to analyse the role of female biomedical technicians in this rapid technical and organizational change. In focus is their working knowledge, or savoir-faire, of blood, instruments and techniques. We give a detailed analysis of technicians’ embrained and embodied skills to create safety in blood and its representations, handle contingencies and invent new procedures and techniques. These transformations are analysed as sociomaterial entanglements, where the doing and undoing of gender, sociomaterial practices, hierarchies of authority and expertise, and emotions are intertwined.
AkrichM (1998) Les utilisateurs, acteurs de l’innovation. Education Permanente138: 79–90.
2.
AmsterdamskaO (2008) Practices, people, and places. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchM and Wajcman J (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205–210.
3.
BarcetALe BasCMercierC (1985) Savoir-Faire et Changements Techniques: Essai d’Economie du Travail Industriel. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
4.
BarleySR (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly41(3): 404–441.
5.
BarleySR (2005) What we know (and mostly don’t know) about technical work. In: AckroydSBattRThompsonP and Tolbert PS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 376–403.
6.
BarleySRBechkyBA (1994) In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work and Occupations21(1): 85–126.
7.
BarleySROrrJE (1997) Introduction: The neglected workforce. In: BarleySROrrJE (eds) Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in US Settings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–22.
8.
BartlettA (2008) Accomplishing sequencing the human genome. Doctoral Thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
9.
BernerB (2008) Working knowledge as performance: On the practical understanding of machines. Work, Employment and Society22(2): 319–336.
10.
BernerB (2011) The making of a risk object: AIDS, gay citizenship and the meaning of blood donation in Sweden in the early 1980s. Sociology of Health & Illness33(3): 384–398.
11.
BernerB (2012) Blodflöden. Blodgivning och Blodtransfusion i det Svenska Samhället. Lund: Arkiv förlag.
12.
BlacklerF (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations. Organization Studies16(6): 1021–1046.
13.
BowkerGCStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
CasperMJClarkeAE (1998) Making the pap smear into the ‘right tool’ for the job: Cervical cancer screening in the USA, circa 1940–95. Social Studies of Science28(2): 255–290.
15.
CookSDNBrownJS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science10(4): 381–400.
DoingP (2004) ‘Lab hands’ and the ‘Scarlet O’: Epistemic politics and (scientific) labor. Social Studies of Science34(3): 299–323.
18.
DuguidP (2005) ‘The art of knowing’: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society21(2): 109–118.
19.
EspelandW (1984) Blood and money: Exploiting the embodied self. In: KotarbaJAFontanaA (eds) The Existential Self in Society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 131–155.
20.
FarrugiaA (2011) Falsification or paradigm shift? Toward a revision of the common sense of transfusion. Transfusion51(1): 216–224.
21.
FaulknerW (2000) The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for ‘making gender stick’ to engineers. Science, Technology & Human Values25(1): 87–119.
22.
GarforthLKerrA (2010) Let’s get organised: Practicing and valuing scientific work inside and outside the laboratory. Sociological Research Online15(2): 11.
GherardiSPerrottaM (2013) Doing by inventing the way of doing: Formativeness as the linkage of meaning and matter. In: CarlilePRNicoliniDLangleyA and Tsoukas H (eds) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–259.
25.
HartleyJMTanseyEM (2015) White coats and no trousers: Narrating the experiences of women technicians in medical laboratories, 1930–90. Notes and Records of the Royal Society69(1): 25–36.
26.
HealyK (2000) Embedded altruism: Blood collection regimes and the European Union’s donor population. American Journal of Sociology105(6): 1633–1657.
27.
HermanC (2015) Rebooting and rerouting: Women’s articulations of frayed careers in science, engineering and technology professions. Gender, Work and Organization22(4): 324–338.
28.
HögmanCFJohanssonA (1981) A simple method for the preparation of microaggregate-poor whole blood. Vox Sanguinis40(4): 286–288.
29.
HögmanCFErikssonLHedlundK and Wallvik J (1988) The bottom and top system: A new technique for blood component preparation and storage. Vox Sanguinis55(4): 211–217.
30.
HögmanCFJohanssonABergiusB (1982) A simple method for the standardization of centrifugation procedures in blood component preparation. Vox Sanguinis43(5): 266–269.
31.
JohanssonAFHögmanCFHedlundKG (1982) Device for blood separation. Patent 4,350,585 USA (filed 21September).
32.
JonesM (2013) Untangling sociomateriality. In: CarlilePRNicoliniDLangleyATsoukasH (eds) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197–226.
33.
KeefeJPotoskyD (1997) Technical dissonance: Conflicting portraits of technicians. In: BarleySROrrJE (eds) Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in US Settings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 53–81.
34.
LeonardiPM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In: LeonardiPMNardiBAKallinikosJ (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–48.
35.
MesseterLLöwB (1977) Automated blood grouping of patients and blood donors using Groupamatic 360 S and a separate mini-computer. System description and evaluation. Vox Sanguinis33(2): 116–123.
36.
MullerAGarrettaMHebertM (1981) Groupamatic system: Overview, history of development and evaluation of use. Vox Sanguinis40(3): 201–213.
37.
MurphyM (2015) Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science45(5): 717–737.
38.
NentwichJCKelanEK (2014) Towards a topology of ‘doing gender’: An analysis of empirical research and its challenges. Gender, Work and Organization21(2): 121–134.
39.
OrrEJ (1996) Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
PackerK (1996) The context-dependent nature of the gendering of technical work: A case study of work in a scientific laboratory. Work, Employment and Society10(1): 125–149.
41.
PecisL (2016) Doing and undoing gender in innovation: Femininities and masculinities in innovation processes. Human Relations69(11): 2117–2140.
42.
Puig de la BellacasaM (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science41(1): 85–106.
43.
RussellNCTanseyEMLearPV (2000) Missing links in the history and practice of science: Teams, technicians and technical work. History of Science38: 237–241.
44.
RyanGWBernardHR (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods15(1): 85–109.
45.
ScarsellettaM (1993) Button pushers and ribbon cutters: Observations on skill and practice in a hospital laboratory and their implications for the shortage of skilled technicians. EQW Working Papers. National Center on the Educational Quality of the Work Force. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
46.
ScarsellettaM (1997) The infamous ‘lab error’: Education, skill, and quality in medical technicians’ work. In: BarleySROrrJE (eds) Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in US Settings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 187–209.
47.
ShapinS (1989) The invisible technician. American Scientist77(6): 554–563.
48.
StarrD (1998) Blood: An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
49.
Styrelsen för Teknisk Utveckling (STU) (1979) STU-symposium i Skokloster 1979. Blod och Blodprodukter (STU-information 140). Stockholm: STU.
50.
Styrelsen för Teknisk Utveckling (STU) (1985) Sammanfattande Rapport. Blod och Blodprodukter (STU-information 509). Stockholm: STU.
51.
Styrelsen för Teknisk Utveckling (STU) (1986) Summarical Report. Blood and Blood Products (STU-information 555). Stockholm: STU.
52.
SuchmanLTriggRBlombergJ (2002) Working artefacts: Ethnomethods of the prototype. British Journal of Sociology53(2): 163–179.
53.
TimmermansSBergM (1997) Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science27(2): 273–305.
54.
TorbicaNKrstevS (2006) World at work: Dental laboratory technicians. Occupational and Environmental Medicine63(2): 145–148.
55.
TrussCConwayEd’AmatoAKellyGMonksKet al. (2012) Knowledge work: Gender-blind or gender-biased?Work, Employment and Society26(5): 735–754.
WylieCD (2015) ‘The artist’s piece is already in the stone’: Constructing creativity in paleontology laboratories. Social Studies of Science45(1): 31–55.
