This article analyzes sensory aspects of material politics in social movements, focusing on two police tools: evidence-collecting cameras and noise meters for protest surveillance. Through interviews with Korean political activists, this article examines the relationship between power and the senses in the material culture of Korean protests and asks why cameras and noise meters appeared in order to control contemporary peaceful protests in the 2000s. The use of cameras and noise meters in contemporary peaceful protests evidences the exercise of what Michel Foucault calls ‘micro-power’. Building on material culture studies, this article also compares the visual power of cameras with the sonic power of noise meters, in terms of a wide variety of issues: the control of things versus words, impacts on protest size, differential effects on organizers and participants, and differences in timing regarding surveillance and punishment.
BallKHaggertyKDLyonD (eds) (2012) Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London: Routledge.
2.
BenfordRDSnowDA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology26: 611–639.
3.
BijsterveldK (2008) Mechanical Sound: Technology, Culture, and Public Problems of Noise in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
BurriRVDumitJ (2008) Social studies of scientific imaging and visualization. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchMWajcmanJ (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 297–318.
5.
CartyV (2015) Social Movements and New Technology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6.
DoyleA (2011) Revisiting the synopticon: Reconsidering Mathiesen’s ‘The Viewer Society’ in the age of Web 2.0. Theoretical Criminology15(3): 283–299.
EnjolrasBSteen-JohnsenKWollebækD (2013) Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides?New Media & Society15(6): 890–908.
9.
EyermanRJamisonA (1998) Music and Social Movements: Mobilizing Traditions in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
FernandezLA (2008) Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti-Globalization Movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
FernandezLAHueyL (2009) Editorial: Is resistance futile? Thoughts on resisting surveillance. Surveillance and Society6(3): 198–202.
12.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
13.
FoucaultM (2001) Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, vol. 3 (ed. FaubionJD; trans. HurleyR). New York: The New Press.
14.
FrickelSGibbonSHowardJKempnerJOttingerGHessDJ (2010) Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science, Technology & Human Values35(4): 444–473.
15.
FullerS (1993) Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
GilliomJMonahanT (2013) SuperVision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
17.
GoodwinC (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633.
18.
GoodwinC (1995) Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science25(2): 237–274.
19.
GoodwinJJasperJM (2015) The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
GrasseniC (ed.) (2007) Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeships and Standards. New York: Berghahn Books.
21.
HackingI (2001) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HanKY (2012) The change and characteristics of Korean Assembly and protest culture: Types and status of protests in historical contexts. In: 2012 spring conference of the Korean society of sociology, 23–25SeptemberChangwon, Korea: Korean Sociological Association, 1067–1082.
23.
HartleyJ (2000) Radiocracy: Sound and citizenship. International Journal of Cultural Studies3(2): 153–159.
24.
HessDJ (2005) Technology and product-oriented movements: Approximating social movement studies and STS. Science, Technology & Human Values30(4): 515–535.
25.
HicksDBeaudryMC (eds) (2010) Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HodderI (1985) Postprocessual archeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory8: 1–26.
27.
HodderI (2002) The interpretation of documents and material culture. In: WeinbergD (ed.) Qualitative Research Methods. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 266–280.
28.
HowesD (ed.) (2005) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
29.
HowesDClassenC (2014) Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. New York: Routledge.
30.
JohnstonH (ed.) (2009) Culture, Social Movements and Protest. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
31.
JurisJS (2008) Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
KimW (2010) Candlelight demonstrations and the change in the Korean demonstration culture: A micro explanation for a macro change. Korean Party Studies Review9(2): 33–59.
34.
Korean National Police Agency (2012) Guideline on evidence collecting activity. Korean National Police Agency rule number 472. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2000000021058 (accessed on 6 May 2016).
35.
KwonI-S (2005) How identities and movement cultures became deeply saturated with militarism: Lessons from the pro-democracy movement of Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies11(2): 7–40.
36.
LaceyK (2013) Listening Publics: The Politics and Experience of Listening in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
37.
LatourB and WeibelP (eds.) (2005) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38.
LawJ (2010) The materials of STS. In: HicksDBeaudryMC (eds) Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–190.
39.
LeeSH (2008) A study on changes in the law on assembly and demonstration: Institutional path. Journal of Association for Korean Public Administration History22: 143–172.
40.
MannSNolanJWellmanB (2003) Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance and Society1(3): 331–355.
41.
MarxGT (1988) Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
MathiesenT (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology1(2): 215–234.
43.
MitchellJP (2013) Performance. In: TilleyCKeaneWKüchlerSRowlandsMSpyerP (eds) Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE, pp. 384–401.
44.
MonahanT (2006) Counter-surveillance as political intervention?Social Semiotics16(4): 515–534.
45.
MonahanT (2015) The right to hide? Anti-surveillance camouflage and the aestheticization of resistance. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies12(2): 159–178.
46.
MooreHL (1986) Space, Text and Gender: An Archaeological Study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OlsenB (2013) Scenes from a troubled engagement: Poststructuralism and material culture studies. In: TilleyCKeaneWKüchlerSRowlandsMSpyerP (eds) Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE, 85–103.
49.
PanagiaD (2009) The Political Life of Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
ParkJY (2014) Kyungchal, 2000 yeon-bu-teo, 3man 4cheon 33myung yeol-gul ib-leok [Police has uploaded faces of 34,033 people (in database) since 2001]. Views & News, 27October2015. Available at: https://www.viewsnnews.com/article?q=115256 (accessed on 6 May 2016).
52.
PickeringA (2010) Material culture and the dance of agency. In: HicksDBeaudryMC (eds) Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–208.
53.
PinchTBijsterveldK (eds) (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
Presidential Council on National Competitiveness (2008) Plan for the advancement of assembly and demonstration for the establishment of legal order and the enhancement of national blend value. In: Seventh meeting document, 25September. Available at: http://17pcnc.pa.go.kr/common/fileDownload.aspx?file=633579485431516750_80.hwp&mf=POLY (accessed on 6 May 2016).
55.
RancièreJ (2004) The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.
56.
RoyWG (2010) Reds, Whites, and Blues: Social Movements, Folk Music, and Race in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
SismondoS (2007) Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchMWajcmanJ (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edn.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 13–32.
58.
SterneJ (ed.) (2012) The Sound Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
59.
ThompsonE (2004) The Soundscape of Modernity: Architectural Acoustics and the Culture of Listening in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
60.
TilleyC (ed.) (1990) Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics and Poststructuralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
61.
TrnkaSDureauCParkJ (eds) (2013) Senses and Citizenships: Embodying Political Life. New York: Routledge.
62.
VanniniPWaskulDGottschalkS (2011) The Senses in Self, Society and Culture. New York: Routledge.
63.
WoodhouseEHessDJBreymanSMartinB (2002) Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science32(2): 297–319.
64.
WrightDFriedewaldMGutwirthS. (2010) Sorting out smart surveillance. Computer Law & Security Review26(4): 343–354.
65.
YooDK (2014) Min-no-chong chong-pa-eob-dae so eum cho ga 47 mong so hwan [47 people were summoned for breaking floor noise standard at the general strike of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions]. Seoul News, 3March. Available at: http://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20140303009007&spage=1 (accessed on 6 May 2016).
66.
YoonSMHeoMM (2001) Jung-bu, hwa-yeom-bung, si-wi-wa, jeon-myun-jeon … go-mu, chung-kyug-chong sa-yong-bang chim [Government, full-scale war with firebombs protest … planning to use rubber guns]. Donga Daily News, 3April. Available at: http://news.donga.com/3/all/20010402/7670963/1 (accessed on 6 May 2016).
