‘Crackpots’ and ‘active researchers’: The controversy over links between arXiv and the scientific blogosphere

Abstract

Controversies over string theory (collectively termed the ‘string wars’) intensified in 2005. Also in that year, the open-access preprint publisher arXiv instituted a new feature called a ‘trackback’. This new feature enabled authors of blog posts discussing a paper on arXiv to leave a trackback (a link) to the post on the paper’s abstract page on arXiv. The determination of which specific bloggers would have access to the feature generated a public controversy that was played out in the blogosphere. Although the community was in almost unanimous agreement that so-called ‘crackpots’ should not have access to the trackback feature, it was unable to reach a consensus as to how to define a ‘crackpot’ or an ‘active researcher’. Blogs may provide a window into science in the making, yet this study shows that blogs confound categorization as permanent or ephemeral scholarly communication. The trackback feature was originally conceived to develop certain blog discourse as an alternative or complementary form of peer review. However, the high-energy physics community as a whole questions the ongoing function of the blog.

Keywords

arXiv blogs communication peer review scientific controversy string wars trackback

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ade

PAR

Aikin

Barkats

. (2014a) BICEP2 I: Detection of B-mode polarization at degree angular scales. ArXiv preprint. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.3985

Ade

PAR

Aikin

Barkats

. (2014b) Detection of B-mode polarization at degree angular scales by BICEP2. Physical Review Letters 112(24): 241101.

Baez

(1993–2011) This week’s finds. Available at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/TWF.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

Baez

(1998) The crackpot index. Available at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

Batts

Anthis

Smith

(2008) Advancing science through conversations: Bridging the gap between blogs and the academy. PLoS Biology 6: e240.

Bonetta

(2007) Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell 129(3): 443–445. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.032

Capitalist Imperialist Pig (2004–2016) Capitalist imperialist pig. Available at: http://capitalistimperialistpig.blogspot.co.uk/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

Capitalist Imperialist Pig (2006) Isn’t it ironic. Capitalist Imperialist Pig, 7 March. Available at: http://capitalistimperialistpig.blogspot.co.uk/2006/03/isnt-it-ironic_07.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

Carroll

(2005a) Arxiv.org joins the blogosphere. Cosmic Variance, 24 August. Available at: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2005/08/24/arxivorg-joins-the-blogosphere/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

10.

Carroll

(2005b) Two cheers for string theory. Cosmic Variance, 21 July. Available at: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2005/07/21/two-cheers-for-string-theory/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

11.

Carroll

(2006a) Crackpots, contrarians and the free market of ideas. Cosmic Variance, 3 March. Available at: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2006/03/03/crackpots-contrarians-and-the-free-market-of-ideas/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

12.

Carroll

(2006b) String theory backlash. Cosmic Variance, 19 June. Available at: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2006/06/19/the-string-theory-backlash/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

13.

Carroll

(2006c) Welcome to the blogosphere. APS News, May. Available at: http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200605/backpage.cfm (accessed 13 December 2014).

14.

Carroll

(2012–2016) Preposterous universe. Available at: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

15.

Collins

(2014) Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science. Social Studies of Science 44(5): 722–735.

16.

Dawid

(2007) Scientific realism in the age of string theory. Physics & Philosophy 11: 1–35.

17.

Dawid

(2009) On the conflicting assessments of the current status of string theory. Philosophy of Science 76(5): 984–996.

18.

Distler

(2002–2016) Musings. Available at: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

19.

Distler

(2002) With enough eyeballs: A manifesto. Musings, 27 October. Available at: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/000018.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

20.

Distler

(2005) Trackbacks and the arXivs. Musings, 24 August. Available at: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/000638.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

21.

Distler

(2006) ArXiv trackback policy. Musings, 5 March. Available at: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/000760.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

22.

Falkowski

(2014) Is BICEP wrong? Resonances, 12 May. Available at: http://resonaances.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/is-bicep-wrong.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

23.

Galison

(1995) Theory bound and unbound: Superstrings and experiment. In: Weinert

(ed.) Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 369–408.

24.

Garvey

(1979) Communication: The Essence of Science Facilitating Information Exchange among Librarians, Scientists, Engineers, and Students. New York: Pergamon Press.

25.

Gieryn

(1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.

26.

Gieryn

(1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

27.

Ginsparg

(1994) First steps toward electronic research communication. Computers in Physics 8(4): 390–396.

28.

Ginsparg

(2011) It was twenty years ago today. ArXiv. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700

29.

Griffiths

(2007) Talking physics in the social web. Physics World 20(1): 24–28.

30.

Grossman

(2014) Rumours swirl over credibility of big bang ripple find. New Scientist, 13 May. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25558-rumours-swirl-over-credibility-of-big-bang-ripple-find/

31.

Gunnarsdóttir

(2005) Scientific journal publications on the role of electronic preprint exchange in the distribution of scientific literature. Social Studies of Science 35(4): 549–579.

32.

Hippel

(2006) ArXiv trackback controversy. Life on the Lattice, 27 February. Available at: http://latticeqcd.blogspot.com.au/2006/02/arxiv-trackback-controversy.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

33.

inSPIRE (2014) inSPIRE. Available at: https://inspirehep.net/?ln=en (accessed 13 December 2014).

34.

Kling

(2004) The internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38(1): 591–631.

35.

Kouper

(2010) Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Science Communication 9(1): 1–10.

36.

Kragh

(2011) Higher Speculations: Grand Theories and Failed Revolutions in Physics and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

37.

Luzón

(2009) Scholarly hyperwriting: The function of links in academic weblogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(1): 75–89.

38.

Maron

Smith

(2008) Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.

39.

Mermin

(1992) What’s wrong in computopia? Physics Today 45(4): 9.

40.

Meyer

Schroeder

(2009) Untangling the web of e-research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3(3): 246–260.

41.

Minol

Spelsberg

Schulte

E and Morris N

(2007) Portals, blogs and co.: The role of the Internet as a medium of science communication. Biotechnology Journal 2(9): 1129–1140.

42.

Motl

(2004–2016) The reference frame. Available at: http://motls.blogspot.co.uk/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

43.

Motl

(2006) Crackpots and scientific resources. The Reference Frame, 4 March. Available at: http://motls.blogspot.in/2006/03/crackpots-and-scientific-resources.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

44.

Motl

(2007) Science: Climate uncertainties cannot go away. The Reference Frame, 26 October. Available at: http://motls.blogspot.co.uk/2007/10/science-climate-uncertainties-cannot-go.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

45.

Orzel

(2006) Physics catfight. Uncertain Principles, 6 March. Available at: http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2006/03/06/physics-catfight/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

46.

Pikas

(2008) Detecting communities in science blogs. In: IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, 2008 (eScience’08), Indianapolis, IN, 7–12 December, 95–102. New York: IEEE.

47.

Puschmann

Mahrt

(2012) Scholarly blogging: A new form of publishing or science journalism 2.0? In: Tokar

Beurskens

Keuneke

(eds) Science and the Internet. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University, 171–181.

48.

Rickles

(2014) A Brief History of String Theory: From Dual Models to M-Theory. Berlin: Springer.

49.

Riesch

Mendel

(2014) Science blogging: Networks, boundaries and limitations. Science as Culture 23(1): 51–72.

50.

Ritson

Camilleri

(2015) Contested boundaries: The string theory debates and ideologies of science. Perspectives on Science 23(2): 192–227.

51.

Schmidt

(2008) To blog or not to blog? Nature Geoscience 1(4): 208.

52.

Shema

Bar-Ilan

Thelwall

(2012) Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLoS ONE 7(5): e35869.

53.

Shema

Bar-Ilan

Thelwall

(2014) Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(5): 1018–1027.

54.

Shuai

Pepe

Bollen

(2012) How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS ONE 7(11): e47523.

55.

Siegel

(n.d.) Are you a quack? Available at: http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html

56.

Smith

(2008) A parallel universe? Blogs, wikis, Web 2.0 and a complicated future for scholarly communication. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community 21(1): 14–18.

57.

Smolin

(2006) The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

58.

Taubes

(1993) Publication by electronic mail takes physics by storm. Science 259(5099): 1246–1248.

59.

‘t Hooft

(n.d.) How to become a bad theoretical physicist. Available at: http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/theoristbad.html (accessed 13 December 2014).

60.

Trench

(2008) Internet: Turning science communication inside-out? In: Bucchi

Trench

(eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, 185–199.

61.

Trench

(2012) Scientists’ blogs: Glimpses behind the scenes. In: Rödder

Franzen

Weingart

(eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and Its Repercussions. Dordrecht: Springer, 273–289.

62.

Various (2003–2006) The string coffee table. Available at: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/string/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

63.

Various (2005–2013) Cosmic variance. Available at: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

64.

Warden

(2010) The Internet and science communication: Blurring the boundaries. Ecancermedicalscience 4: 203.

65.

Wilkins

(2008) The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23(8): 411–413.

66.

Woit

(2004–2016) Not even wrong. Available at: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/ (accessed 13 December 2014).

67.

Woit

(2006) Letter to the arXiv advisory board. Not Even Wrong, 23 February. Available at: http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=353 (accessed 13 December 2014).