Automating the Horae: Boundary-work in the age of computers

Abstract

This article describes the intense software filtering that has allowed the arXiv e-print repository to sort and process large numbers of submissions with minimal human intervention, making it one of the most important and influential cases of open access repositories to date. This article narrates arXiv’s transformation, using sophisticated sorting/filtering algorithms to decrease human workload, from a small mailing list used by a few hundred researchers to a site that processes thousands of papers per month. However, there are significant negative consequences for authors who have been filtered out of arXiv’s main categories. There is thus a continued need to check and balance arXiv’s boundaries, based on the essential tension between stability and innovation.

Keywords

arXiv boundary work open access physics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbate

(1999) Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Baez

(1998) The crackpot index. Available at: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html (accessed 8 March 2016).

Barad

(2014) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3): 801–831.

Beebe

(2004) 25 years of TEX and mEtaFoNt: Looking back and looking forward. TUGboat 25(1): 7–30.

Björk

Laakso

Welling

Paetau

(2014) Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(2): 237–250.

Bohlin

(2004) Communication regimes in competition: The current transition in scholarly communication seen through the lens of the sociology of technology. Social Studies of Science 34(3): 365–391.

Bonneuil

Foyer

Wynne

(2014) Genetic fallout in bio-cultural landscapes: Molecular imperialism and the cultural politics of (not) seeing transgenes in Mexico. Social Studies of Science 44(6): 901–929.

Bourdieu

(1979) La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Bourne

Hahn

(2003) A History of Online Information Services, 1963-1976. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

10.

Bowker

Star

(1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

11.

Collins

(2010) Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Collins

(2014) Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science. Social Studies of Science 44(5): 722–735.

13.

Collins

Bartlett

Reyes-Galindo

(manuscript) The ecology of fringe science and its bearing on policy.

14.

Collins

Ginsparg

Reyes-Galindo

(manuscript) A note concerning primary source understanding.

15.

Cronin

(2003) Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. New Review of Academic Librarianship 9(1): 1–24.

16.

Deerwester

Dumais

Furnas

Landauer

Harshman

(1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6): 391–407.

17.

Delborne

(2008) Transgenes and transgressions: Scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice. Social Studies of Science 38(4): 509–541.

18.

De Winter

JCF

Zadpoor

Dodou

(2014) The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study. Scientometrics 98(2): 1547–1565.

19.

Espeland

Sauder

(2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40.

20.

Finch

Bell

Bellingham

. (2012) Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: How to expand access to research publications: Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. Available at: http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf (accessed 8 March 2016).

21.

Foucault

(1999) Cours du 22 janvier 1975. In: Marchetti

Salomoni

Ewald

Fontana

(eds) Les Anormaux: Cours au College de France 1974-1975. Paris: Gallimard, 55–80.

22.

Gardner

(1957) Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. New York: Dover.

23.

Gargouri

Larivière

Gingras

. (2012) Testing the Finch hypothesis on green OA mandate ineffectiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.8174.

24.

Gentil-Beccot

(2010) The driving and evolving role of grey literature in high-energy physics. In: Farace

Schöpfel

(eds) Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 155–166.

25.

Gieryn

(1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

26.

Ginsparg

(1994) @xxx.lanl.gov: First steps toward electronic research communication. Los Alamos Science 22: 156–165.

27.

Gunnarsdóttir

(2005) Scientific journal publications: On the role of electronic preprint exchange in the distribution of scientific literature. Social Studies of Science 35(4): 549–579.

28.

Gunnarsdóttir

(2010) The archive saga: Shepherds of data, documents and code, and their will to order. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cardiff University, Cardiff.

29.

Hanseth

Monteiro

Hatling

(1996) Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values 21(4): 407–426.

30.

Hård

(1993) Beyond harmony and consensus: A social conflict approach to technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 18(4): 408–432.

31.

Hofmann

(1999) Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Berkeley, CA, 15–19 August. New York: ACM, 50–57.

32.

Jacsó

(2005) Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review 29(2): 208–214.

33.

Juola

(2006) Authorship attribution. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 1(3): 233–334.

34.

Kaiser

(2005) Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Kaiser

(2011) How the Hippies Saved Physics: Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

36.

Kelk

Devine

(2012) A scienceographic comparison of physics papers from the arXiv and viXra archives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.1036.

37.

King

Star

(1990) Conceptual foundations for the development of organizational decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, vol. 3, Kailua-Kona, HI, 2–5 January. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.

38.

Klein

Kleinman

(2002) The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology & Human Values 27(1): 28–52.

39.

Laakso

(2014) Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99(2): 475–494.

40.

Lamont

Molnár

(2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.

41.

Landauer

Dumais

(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2): 211–240.

42.

Langmuir

(1989) Pathological science. Physics Today 42(10): 36–48.

43.

Larivière

Sugimoto

Macaluso

. (2014) arXiv e-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(6): 1157–1169.

44.

Lewenstein

(1995) From fax to facts: Communication in the cold fusion saga. Social Studies of Science 25(3): 403–436.

45.

MacKenzie

(2003) An equation and its worlds: Bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Social Studies of Science 33(6): 831–868.

46.

MacKenzie

(2014) A sociology of algorithms: High-frequency trading and the shaping of markets. Preprint. School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

47.

Martin

(1988) Analyzing the fluoridation controversy: Resources and structures. Social Studies of Science 18(2): 331–363.

48.

O’Connell

(2000) Physicists thriving with paperless publishing. arXiv preprint arXiv:physics/0007040

49.

Reyes-Galindo

(2011) The sociology of theoretical physics. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff.

50.

Rieger

Warner

(2010) Sustainability case study: Exploring community-based business models for arXiv. In: iPRES: 7th international conference on preservation of digital objects, Vienna, 19–24 September.

51.

Rosenfeld

Wakerling

Addis

Gex

Taylor

(1970) Preprints in particles and fields. In: Proceedings of the symposium on handling of nuclear information, Vienna, 16–20 February. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 405–416.

52.

Ross

(2011) Problematizing the user in user-centred production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science 41(2): 251–270.

53.

Schroeder

(2014) Does Google shape what we know? Prometheus 32(2): 145–160.

54.

Siegel

(2011) Are you a quack? Available at: http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html (accessed 8 March 2016).

55.

Skitka

Mosier

Burdick

(1999) Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51(5): 991–1006.

56.

Skitka

Mosier

Burdick

(2000) Accountability and automation bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(4): 701–717.

57.

Smolin

(2006) The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

58.

‘t Hooft

(2003) How to become a bad theoretical physicist. Available at: http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/theoristbad.html (accessed 8 March 2016).

59.

Wazeck

(2013) Marginalization processes in science: The controversy about the theory of relativity in the 1920s. Social Studies of Science 43(2): 163–190.

60.

Wazeck

(2014) Einstein’s Opponents: The Public Controversy about the Theory of Relativity in the 1920s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

61.

Wykle

(2014) Enclaves of anarchy: Preprint sharing, 1940-1990. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51(1): 1–10.