BayerBM (2004) On cultural history as transformation – Or, what’s the matter with psychology anyway? In: BrockALouwJvan HoornW (eds) Rediscovering the History of Psychology: Essays Inspired by the work of Kurt Danziger. New York: Springer, pp. 119–140.
CapshewJH (1999) Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CrombyJ (2004) Between constructionism and neuroscience: The societal co-constitution of embodied subjectivity. Theory & Psychology14(6): 797–821.
6.
DanzigerK (1990) Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
EpsteinS (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
Fausto-SterlingA (2000) Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
9.
FayeC (2012) American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences43(2): 514–521.
10.
FosterH (2012) Post-critical. October139: 3–8.
11.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
12.
FreedmanEB (1998) ‘The burning of letters continues’: Elusive identities and the historical construction of sexuality. Journal of Women’s History9(4): 181–200.
13.
GitlinT (1978) Media sociology : The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society6(2): 205–253.
14.
HackingI (1995a) Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
HackingI (1995b) The looping effects of human kinds. In: SperberDPremackDPremackAJ (eds) Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351–383.
16.
HackingI (2002) Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HallS (1981) Notes on deconstructing ‘the popular’. In: SamuelR (ed.) People’s History and Socialist Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 227–240.
18.
HarawayDJ (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
19.
HeathDRappRTaussigK-S (2008) Genetic citizenship. In: NugentDVincentJ (eds) A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 152–167.
20.
HermanE (1995) The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21.
HilgartnerS (1990) The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science20(3): 519–539.
22.
IgoSE (2007) The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
IrwinA (2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science36(2): 299–320.
24.
JacynaLSCasperST (2012) The Neurological Patient in History. Rochester, NY: University Rochester Press.
25.
JasanoffS (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
LatourB (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry30(2): 225–248.
27.
LezaunJSonerydL (2007) Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science16(3): 279–297.
28.
LoganCA (2001) ‘[A]re Norway rats …things?’: Diversity versus generality in the use of albino rats in experiments on development and sexuality. Journal of the History of Biology34(2): 287–314.
29.
MarresNLezaunJ (2011) Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society40(4): 489–509.
30.
MorawskiJG (2001) The dynamics of uncertainty. History and Theory40(3): 401–418.
31.
MorawskiJG (2005) Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences18(4): 77–105.
32.
MurphyM (2006) Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
O’ConnorCJoffeH (2013) How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence. Public Understanding of Science22(3): 254–268.
34.
PettitM (2011) The SPSSI Task Force on Sexual Orientation, the nature of sex, and the contours of activist science. Journal of Social Issues67(1): 92–105.
35.
PettitM (2013a) Becoming glandular: Endocrinology, mass culture, and experimental lives in the interwar age. The American Historical Review118(4): 1052–1076.
36.
PettitM (2013b) The Science of Deception: Psychology and Commerce in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
PettitMDavidsonI (2014) Can the history of psychology have an impact?Theory & Psychology24(5): 709–716.
38.
PickrenWRutherfordA (2010) A History of Modern Psychology in Context. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
RoseN (1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.
40.
RoseN (1996) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RossD (2014) Getting over it? From the social to the human sciences. Modern Intellectual History11(1): 191–209.
42.
RutherfordA (2009) Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Technology of Behavior from Laboratory to Life, 1950s–1970s. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
43.
SavageM (2010) Identities and Social Change in Britain since 1940: The Politics of Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
SavageMBurrowsR (2007) The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology41(5): 885–899.
45.
SmithR (1988) Does the history of psychology have a subject?History of the Human Sciences1(2): 147–177.
46.
StaeubleI (1991) ‘Psychological man’ and human subjectivity in historical perspective. History of the Human Sciences4(3): 417–432.
47.
StarkL (2012) Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
WynneB (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science1(3): 281–304.