This article draws on empirical material concerning the communication and use of knowledge in experimental physics and its relations to the culture of theoretical physics. The role that trust plays in these interactions is used to create a model of social distance between interacting theoretical and experimental cultures. This article thus seeks to reintroduce trust as a fundamental element in answering the problem of disunity in the sociology of knowledge.
BourdieuP (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information14(6): 19–47.
2.
CarusiA (2008) Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust. Ethics and Information Technology10(4): 243–254.
3.
ClarkeAEStarSL (2008) The social worlds framework: A theory/methods package. In: HackettEJAmsterdamskaOLynchMWajcmanJ (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 113–137.
4.
CollinsHRibeiroR (2007) The bread-making machine: Tacit knowledge and two types of action. Organization Studies28(9): 1417–1433.
5.
CollinsHM (1984) Researching spoonbending: Concepts and practise of participatory fieldwork. In: BellCRobertsH (eds) Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 54–69.
6.
CollinsHM (1992) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
CollinsHM (2001) Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science31(1): 71–85.
8.
CollinsHM (2004) Gravity’s Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
CollinsHM (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
CollinsHM (2011a) Gravity’s Ghost: Scientific Discovery in the Twenty-first Century. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
CollinsHM (2011b) Language and practice. Social Studies of Science41(2): 271–300.
12.
CollinsHM (2014) Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science. Social Studies of Science44(3): 1–14.
13.
CollinsHMEvansR (2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science32(2): 235–296.
14.
CollinsHMEvansR (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
CollinsHMSandersG (2007) They give you the keys and say ‘drive it!’ Managers, referred expertise, and other expertises. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A38(4): 621–641.
16.
DuhemP (1996) Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
17.
DupréJ (1995) The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
DysonF (2004) A meeting with Enrico Fermi. Nature427: 297.
19.
FeyerabendP (1975) Against Method, 3rd edn.London: Verso.
20.
GalisonP (1996a) Computer simulations and the trading zone. In: GalisonPStumpDJ (eds) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 118–157.
21.
GalisonP (1996b) Introduction: The Context of Disunity. In: GalisonPStumpDJ (eds) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–36.
22.
GalisonP (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
GalisonP (2010) Trading with the enemy. In: GormanME (ed.) Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 25–52.
24.
GalisonPStumpDJ (eds) (1996) The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GiddensA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
GoodingD (1986) How do scientists reach agreement about novel observations?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A17(2): 205–230.
28.
HardinR (2002) Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
HardinR (2006) Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
HaycockDB (2011) The facts of life and death: A case of exceptional longevity. In: HowletPMorganMS (eds) How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–428.
31.
HedgecoeAM (2012) Trust and regulatory organizations: The role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review. Social Studies of Science42(5): 662–683.
32.
IrwinA (2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science36(2): 299–320.
33.
KennefickD (2000) Star crushing: Theoretical practice and the theoreticians’ regress. Social Studies of Science30(1): 5–40.
34.
KennefickD (2007) Traveling at the Speed of Thought: Einstein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Knorr CetinaK (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
LahsenM (2005) Seductive simulations? Uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science35(6): 895–922.
37.
LatourB (1986) Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. In: KuklickHLongE (eds) Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1–40.
38.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979 [1986]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LewisJAtkinsonP (2011) The surveillance of cellular scientists’ practice. BioSocieties6(4): 381–400.
41.
LuhmannN (1979) Trust and Power: Two Works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
McDonellG (1997) Scientific and everyday knowledge: Trust and the politics of environmental initiatives. Social Studies of Science27(6): 819–863.
43.
MacKenzieD (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
44.
MacKenzieD (2001) Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45.
MayerRCDavisJHSchoormanFD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
46.
MedawarPB (1969) Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought. London: Methuen.
47.
MerzMKnorr CetinaK (1997) Deconstruction in a ‘thinking’ science: Theoretical physicists at work. Social Studies of Science27(1): 73–111.
48.
MonteiroMKeatingE (2009) Managing misunderstandings: The role of language in interdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Science Communication31(1): 6–28.
49.
MorganMS (2001) Travelling facts. In: HowletPMorganMS (eds) How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–39.
50.
Pickering (1981) Constraints on controversy: The case of the magnetic monopole. Social Studies of Science11(1): 63–93.
51.
PickeringA (1984) Against putting the phenomena first: The discovery of the weak neutral current. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A15(2): 85–117.
52.
PickeringA (1999) Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
53.
PinchTJ (1986) Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar-Neutrino Detection. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
54.
PorterTM (1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
Reyes-GalindoL (2011) The sociology of theoretical physics. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
56.
RobsonK (1992) Accounting numbers as ‘inscription’: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society17(7): 685–708.
57.
SchützA (1932 [1967]) The Phenomenology of the Social World (trans. WalshGLehnertF). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
58.
ShapinS (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
59.
ShapinS (1995) Cordelia’s love: Credibility and the social studies of science. Perspectives on Science3(3): 255–275.
60.
ShapinSSchafferSHobbesT (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump (p. 48204). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61.
ShragerJ (2010) From wizards to trading zones: Crossing the chasm of computers in scientific collaboration. In: GormanME (ed.) Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 107–124.
62.
ShrumWChompalovIGenuthJ (2001) Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science31(5): 681–730.
63.
ShrumWGenuthJChompalovI (2007) Structures of Scientific Collaboration. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
64.
StarSL (1985) Scientific work and uncertainty. Social Studies of Science15(3): 391–427.
65.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
66.
StephensNAtkinsonPGlasnerP (2011) Documenting the doable and doing the documented: Bridging strategies at the UK Stem Cell Bank. Social Studies of Science41(6): 791–813.
67.
SztompkaP (1999) Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WilsonGHerndlCG (2007) Boundary objects as rhetorical exigence: Knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication21(2): 129–154.
70.
ZeeA (1986) Fearful Symmetry: The Search for Beauty in Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan.
