Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Science diplomacy supposedly builds international cooperation through scientific and technical exchange. In practice, however, there are important but often overlooked instances where it might create conflict instead – as with accusations of espionage surrounding the US Naval Medical Research Unit 2 (NAMRU-2) in Indonesia. Did American science diplomacy backfire in Indonesia and, if so, why? Most literature fails to anticipate this possibility, let alone explain it, since science diplomacy is rarely subject to critical analysis. Rather than shun politics or, similarly, simply blame the demise of NAMRU-2 on the military or avian influenza, I consider both the successes and failures of this research unit in the context of Indonesia’s transition to democracy and America’s legacy from the Cold War. Based on this history, I propose that the effects of science diplomacy depend on strategic communication and exchange, as well as elite influence and material incentives. Therefore, by challenging the conventional wisdom about science diplomacy, NAMRU-2 can help advance the theory and practice of this potentially useful tool of statecraft.

Keywords

civil–military relations global health international relations public diplomacy science diplomacy soft power

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2009) Science and diplomacy: A conceptual framework. Available at: http://diplomacy.aaas.org/files/scidip_framework_aaas_2009.pdf (accessed May 2010).

Anderson

(2002) Introduction: Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science 32(5–6): 643–658.

Atkinson

(2006) Constructivist implications of material power: Military engagement and the socialization of states, 1972–2000. International Studies Quarterly 50(3): 509–537.

Badger

(2009) Science diplomacy: Trading frock coats for lab coats. Miller-McCune, 9 February. Available at: http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/science-diplomacy-trading-frock-coats-for-lab-coats-3953/ (accessed December 2010).

Baskara

(2008) NAMRU: Misi KESEHATAN atau Jaringan INTELIJEN Amerika? Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit Narasi.

Belford

(2008) Indonesia’s bird flu warrior takes on the world. Macau Daily Times, 8 December. Available at: http://www.archive.macaudailytimes.com.mo/index.php?option=com_content&;view=article&id=20100:indonesias-bird-flu-warrior-takes-on-the-world&catid=14:asia-pacific-news&Itemid=4 (accessed April 2014).

Berry

(2009) Becoming a virus hunter. MHS Profiles. Available at: http://www.health.mil/News_And_Multimedia/MHS_Profiles/profilesvirushunter.aspx (accessed March 2011).

Bijker

Bal

Hendriks

(2009) The Paradox of Scientific Authority. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bijker

Hughes

Pinch

(eds) (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Direction in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

10.

Brachman

Berkelman

Burke

Gensheimer

Hospedales

Kimball

. (2001) Perspectives on the Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System: A Program Review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

11.

Bush

Yudhoyono

(2006) Joint statement between the United States and the Republic of Indonesia. Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/p/eap/rls/prs/76323.htm (accessed 20 May 2014).

12.

Buzan

Wæver

de Wilde

(1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.

13.

Chretien

Glass

Coldren

Noah

Hyer

Gaydos

. (2006) Department of defense global emerging infections surveillance and response system Indian Ocean tsunami response. Military Medicine 171(10): 12–14.

14.

Cable News Network (CNN) (2006) Bird flu scare: Human spread? Cable News Network, 24 May. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/conditions/05/24/indonesia.birdflu/index.html?_s=PM:HEALTH (accessed April 2014).

15.

Cribb

(2002) Unresolved problems in the Indonesian killings of 1965–1966. Asian Survey 42(4): 550–563.

16.

Cull

(2008) Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.

17.

Davies

(2010) The Global Politics of Health. Cambridge: Polity Press.

18.

Dickson

(2009) The limits of science diplomacy. SciDev.Net, 4 June. Available at: http://www.scidev.net/global/capacity-building/editorials/the-limits-of-science-diplomacy.html (accessed April 2014).

19.

Ear

(2012) Emerging infectious disease surveillance in Southeast Asia: Cambodia, Indonesia, and the US Naval Area Medical Research Unit 2. Asian Security 8(2): 164–187.

20.

Elbe

(2010) Haggling over viruses: The downside risks of securitizing infectious disease. Health Policy and Planning 25(6): 476–485.

21.

Flink

Schreiterer

(2010) Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Towards a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy 37(9): 665–677.

22.

Frist

(2009) Medicine as a currency for peace through global health diplomacy. Yale Law and Policy Review 26(1): 209–229.

23.

Gallagher

(1990) Egypt’s Other Wars: Epidemics and the Politics of Public Health. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

24.

Gieryn

(1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.

25.

Gieryn

(1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

26.

Global Health Matters (2010) Indonesian minister calls for increased collaboration. Available at: http://www.fic.nih.gov/NEWS/GLOBALHEALTHMATTERS/Pages/0610_indonesia.aspx (accessed April 2014).

27.

Goldsmith

Horiuchi

(2009) Spinning the globe? U.S. public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. Journal of Politics 71(3): 863–875.

28.

Gordon

(2011) Health, stabilization and securitization: Towards understanding the drivers of the military role in health interventions. Medicine, Conflict and Survival 27(1): 43–66.

29.

Guston

(2000) Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Gutlove

(1998) Health bridges for peace: Integrating health care with community reconciliation. Medicine, Conflict and Survival 14(1): 6–23.

31.

Haas

(1992) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1): 1–35.

32.

Headrick

(1988) The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850–1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Hecker

(2011) Adventures in scientific nuclear diplomacy. Physics Today 64(7): 31–37.

34.

Hoffman

(2009) The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and its Dangerous Legacy. New York: Doubleday.

35.

Holbrooke

Garrett

(2008) ‘Sovereignty’ that risks global health. The Washington Post, 10 August. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/08/AR2008080802919.html (accessed April 2014).

36.

Hotez

(2010) Peace through vaccine diplomacy. Science 327(5971): 1301.

37.

Hotland

(2008) Ministers want NAMRU-2 shut down. The Jakarta Post, 26 June. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/06/26/ministers-want-namru2-shut-down.html (accessed April 2014).

38.

Hutapea

(2009) NAMRU-2 employees seek house help. The Jakarta Globe, 5 February. Available at: http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/archive/namru-2-employees-seek-house-help/ (accessed April 2014).

39.

Jasanoff

(1987) Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 17(2): 195–230.

40.

Kaiser

(2013) Unconventional vaccine shows promise against malaria. Science 341(6146): 605.

41.

Keller

(2006) Geographies of power, legacies of mistrust: Colonial medicine in the global present. Historical Geography 34: 26–48.

42.

Khalik

(2008) U.S. insists on immunity for all Namru-2 laboratory staff. The Jakarta Post, 25 April. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/04/25/us-insists-immunity-all-namru2-laboratory-staff.html (accessed April 2014).

43.

Kickbusch

Silberschmidt

Buss

(2007) Global health diplomacy: The need for new perspectives, strategic approaches and skills in global health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85(3): 230–232.

44.

King

(2002) Security, disease, commerce: Ideologies of postcolonial global health. Social Studies of Science 32(5–6): 763–789.

45.

Kirksey

(2012) Freedom in Entangled Worlds: West Papua and the Architecture of Global Power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

46.

Kissinger

(1969) Memorandum for the President, Djakarta visit: Your meetings with President Suharto. Available at: http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB242/19690718.pdf (accessed November 2013).

47.

Kroenig

(2009) Exporting the bomb: Why states provide sensitive nuclear assistance. American Political Science Review 103(1): 112–133.

48.

Kuhn

(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

49.

Kusiak

(2010) Instrumentalized rationality, cross-cultural mediators, and civil epistemologies of late colonialism. Social Studies of Science 40(6): 871–902.

50.

Latour

Woolgar

(1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverley Hills, CA: SAGE.

51.

Leifer

(1983) Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

52.

Levi

D’Arcy

(2005) Untapped Potential: US Science and Technology Cooperation with the Islamic World. Washington, DC: Saban Center for Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution.

53.

Levine

Cardona

Dowdle

Germann

Gilchrist

Hughes

. (2007) Review of the DoD-GEIS Influenza Programs: Strengthening Global Surveillance and Response. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

54.

Liat

Sigit

Hadi

(1986) Status of commensal rodent-borne diseases research in Indonesia. Bulletin of Health Research 14(3): 4–34.

55.

Lim

Murphy

Calloway

Tribble

(2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of diarrheal diseases. Military Medicine 170(4): 30–38.

56.

Lord

Turekian

(2007) Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science 315(5813): 769–770.

57.

Lowe

(2010a) Preparing Indonesia: H5N1 influenza through the lens of global health. Indonesia 90: 147–170.

58.

Lowe

(2010b) Viral clouds: Becoming H5N1 in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology 25(4): 625–649.

59.

(1969) Men against Asian diseases. Taiwan Review, 1 January. Available at: http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=134607&ctNode=1206&mp=1 (accessed April 2014).

60.

MacLeod

(2000) Nature and empire: Science and the colonial enterprise. Osiris 15: 1–13.

61.

McNeil

(2006) Bird flu case may be first double jump. The New York Times, 24 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/world/asia/24birdflu.html?_r=0 (accessed April 2014).

62.

Manzione

(2000) ‘Amusing and amazing and practical and military’: The legacy of scientific internationalism in American foreign policy, 1945–1963. Diplomatic History 24(1): 21–55.

63.

Maulia

(2009) New health minister faces questions of credibility. The Jakarta Post, 23 October. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/10/23/new-health-minister-faces-questions-credibility.html (accessed April 2014).

64.

Melissen

(ed.) (2005) The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

65.

Merton

(1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

66.

Meshkati

(2012) Engineering diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. Available at: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2012/engineering-diplomacy (accessed April 2014).

67.

Naval Medical Research and Development News (2013) NMRC-Asia commanding officer’s message. Naval Medical Research and Development News 5(10): 2.

68.

Naval Medical Research Center (2012) Naval Medical Research Unit 2 (NAMRU-2). Available at: http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmrc/Pages/namru_2.htm (accessed September 2012).

69.

Normile

(2008) Dispute clouds the future of U.S. naval lab in Indonesia. Science 320(5876): 598–599.

70.

Nurhayati

(2008) Bird flu as weapon ‘nutty’ idea, says Gates. The Jakarta Post, 26 February. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/02/25/bird-flu-biological-weapon-quotnuttyquot-idea-says-gates.html (accessed April 2014).

71.

Nye

(2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

72.

Nye

(2008) Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 94–109.

73.

Peake

Morrison

Ledgerwood

Gannon

(2011) The Defense Department’s Enduring Contributions to Global Health: The Future of the U.S. Army and Navy Overseas Medical Research Laboratories. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.

74.

Pellerin

(2007) U.S. navy, Egyptian scientists fight global illness, infection. USINFO, 25 January. Available at: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2007/01/20070125113122lcnirellep0.3603327.html#axzz2zffRZsRO (accessed April 2014).

75.

Perlez

(2003) Indonesia bans foreign aid workers from embattled province. The New York Times, 21 September. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/21/world/indonesia-bans-foreign-aid-workers-from-embattled-province.html (accessed April 2014).

76.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2002) Global Indicators Database: American Technological and Scientific Advances. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/46/survey/1/ (accessed April 2014).

77.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2003) Global Indicators Database: American Technological and Scientific Advances. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/46/survey/4/ (accessed April 2014).

78.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2005) American character gets mixed reviews: U.S. image up slightly, but still negative. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2005/06/Pew-Global-Report1-6-23-05-final-with-Morocco-note-and-topline.pdf (accessed April 2014).

79.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2007) Global indicators database, American technological and scientific advances. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/46/survey/8/ (accessed April 2014).

80.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2012) Global indicators database, American technological and scientific advances. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/46/survey/14/ (accessed April 2014).

81.

Pew Global Attitudes Project (2013) Global indicators database, American technological and scientific advances. Available at: http://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/46/survey/15/ (accessed April 2014).

82.

Phillips

(1967) Twenty years of cholera research. JAMA 202(7): 610–614.

83.

Quevedo

(2013) The importance of international research institutions for science diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy. Available at: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2013/importance-international-research-institutions-for-science-diplomacy (accessed April 2014).

84.

Robinson

(2010) Building trust through medical partnerships. DoD Live. Available at: http://www.dodlive.mil/index.php/2010/11/medical-monday-building-trust-through-medical-partnerships/ (accessed April 2014).

85.

Royal Society (2010) New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power. London: Science Policy Centre, The Royal Society.

86.

Savarino

(2002) A legacy in 20th-century medicine: Robert Allan Phillips and the taming of cholera. Clinical Infectious Diseases 35(6): 713–720.

87.

Setyarso

B, WMU

Dhyatmika

Yugha

Yoga

Bunga

(2008) NAMRU under scrutiny. Tempo, 29 April. No. 35/VIII.

88.

Shilling

(n.d.) Timeline: History of naval medical research. History of the Research Division, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, U.S. Department of the Navy. Available at: http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmrc/documents/Timeline.pdf (accessed March 2011).

89.

Simamora

(2009) Let me prove it all in my work: Endang. The Jakarta Post, 29 October. Available at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/10/29/let-me-prove-it-all-my-work-endang.html (Accessed May 2014).

90.

Simpson

(2008) Economists with Guns: Authoritarian Development and U.S. Indonesian Relations, 1960–1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

91.

Sipress

(2005) Indonesia neglected bird flu until too late, experts say. The Washington Post, 20 October. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/19/AR2005101902147.html (accessed April 2014).

92.

Slaughter

A-M

(2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

93.

Smith

(2012) Insights into surveillance from the influenza virus and benefit sharing controversy. Global Change, Peace & Security 24(1): 71–81.

94.

Supari

(2008) It’s Time for the World to Change: In the Spirit of Dignity, Equity, and Transparency: Divine Hand Behind Avian Influenza. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Sulaksana Watinsa Indonesia.

95.

Turekian

Lord

(2009) The science of diplomacy. Foreign Policy, 5 May. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/05/04/the_science_of_diplomacy (accessed April 2014).

96.

UPI International Intelligence (2009) AUC denies spying on Egypt. 1 April. Available at: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2009/04/01/AUC-denies-spying-on-Egypt/UPI-24461238625538/ (accessed April 2014).

97.

USC Center on Public Diplomacy (2010) Science diplomacy and the prevention of conflict. Available at: http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/useruploads/u22281/Science%20Diplomacy%20Proceedings.pdf (accessed April 2014).

98.

Vaughan

(1991) Curing their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

99.

Vaughn

(2007) Indonesia: Domestic Politics, Strategic Dynamics, and American Interests. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

100.

Vogel

(2006) Bioweapons proliferation: Where science studies and public policy collide. Social Studies of Science 36(5): 659–690.

101.

Walz

(2010) Navy’s Pacific lab changes commanding officers and location. Naval Medical Research and Development News 2(8): 1.

102.

Weiner

(2011) Our Own Worst Enemy? Institutional Interests and the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Expertise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

103.

Weingart

(1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy 26(3): 151–161.

104.

Zogby International (2004) Impressions of America: How Arabs view America, how Arabs learn about America. Available at: http://www.aaiusa.org/page/-/Polls/ArabOpinion/ImpressionsOfAmerica_2004.pdf (accessed April 2014).

Advancing science diplomacy: Indonesia and the US Naval Medical Research Unit

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References