One of the most significant yet largely hidden outcomes of the Cold War was the proliferation of hundreds of large, multipurpose dams throughout Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America under the auspices of programs of water resource development. These programs were the result of technical assistance programs created and guided by various organs of the US government. Carried out as an effort to convince newly independent states of America’s support and good intentions, this proliferation of water expertise was spearheaded by the US Bureau of Reclamation – an agency of the Department of Interior that became embroiled within efforts of the State Department to achieve specific geopolitical goals by containing the spread of global communism. This paper examines the evolution of a technopolitical network constructed around the Bureau’s most intensive engagement in supervising water resource development overseas, the promotion and design of the Pa Mong dam on the Mekong River during the 1960s. This case contributes to ongoing debates over the convergence between technical expertise and water by considering the complex intermingling – and co-production – of geopolitical practices and technological knowledge and expertise in efforts to transform rivers that were characteristic of the mid-20th century.
AlatoutS (2008) States of scarcity: Water, space, and identity politics in Israel, 1948–1959. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26: 959–982.
2.
Alatout (2009) Bringing abundance into environmental politics: Constructing a Zionist network of water abundance, immigration, and colonization. Social Studies of Science39(3): 363–394.
3.
AsdalKBrennaBMoserI (2007) Re-inventing politics of the state: Science and the politics of contestation. In: AsdalKBrennaBMoserI (eds) Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions. Oslo: Oslo Academic Press, 7–53.
4.
BakkerK (1999) The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography18(2): 209–232.
5.
BakkerKBridgeG (2006) Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’. Progress in Human Geography30(1): 5–27.
6.
BarnesJ (2009) Managing the waters of Ba’th country: The politics of water scarcity in Syria. Geopolitics14(3): 510–530.
7.
BiggsD (2006) Reclamation nations: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s role in water management and nation-building in the Mekong Valley, 1945–1975. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society4: 225–246.
8.
BijkerW (2007) Dikes and dams, thick with politics. Isis98(1): 109–123.
9.
BillingtonDJacksonD (2006) Big Dams of the New Deal Era: A Confluence of Engineering and Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
10.
CastreeN (2002) False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode34(1): 111–146.
11.
De LaetMMolA (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science30(2): 225–263.
12.
DoelR (2003) Constituting the postwar earth sciences: The military’s influence on the environmental sciences in the USA after 1945. Social Studies of Science33(5): 635–666.
13.
DominyF (1994/1996). Oral History Interviews, conducted and edited by Brit Allan Story, 6April1994, and 8April1996. College Park, MD: National Archives and Records Administration.
14.
Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) (1957) Development of Water Resources in the Lower Mekong Basin. Bangkok: ECAFE.
15.
EkbladhD (2002) ‘Mr. TVA’: Grass-Roots development, David Lilienthal, and the rise and fall of the Tennessee Valley Authority as a symbol for U.S. overseas development, 1933–1973. Diplomatic History26: 335–374.
16.
FarvarMTMiltonJ (eds) (1972) The Careless Technology: Ecology and International Development. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
FurlongK (2010) Small technologies, big change: Rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography35(4): 460–482.
19.
GaddisJL (2005) Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War, 2nd edition.New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GregoryD (1995) Imaginative geographies. Progress in Human Geography19(4): 447–485.
HannaW (1968) The Mekong Project, Part V: The prize at Pa Mong. AUFS Southeast Asia Series, Vol. XVI, No. 14 (July).
23.
HirschP (2011) China and the cascading geopolitics of Lower Mekong dams. The Asia-Pacific Journal9(20): 1–4.
24.
HughesT (1993) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
IntrocasoD (1995) The politics of technology: The ‘unpleasant truth about Pleasant Dam’. Western Historical Quarterly26: 333–352.
26.
JacksonDC (1993) Engineering in the progressive era: A new look at Frederick Haynes Newell and the U.S. Reclamation Service. Technology and Culture34(3): 539–574.
27.
JasanoffS (2004) The idiom of co-production. In: JasanoffS (ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–12.
28.
JohnsonLB (1965) Johnson on Southeast Asian aid. Current History49(291): 303–308.
29.
JohnsonLB (1966) Address at Johns Hopkins University: ‘Peace without conquest’, A7 April 1965. In: Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson, Containing the Public Messages, Speeches, and Statements of the President, 1965, Book I – January 1 to May 31, 1965. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
30.
KarabellZ (1999) Architects of Intervention: The United States, the Third World, and the Cold War, 1946–1962. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press.
31.
KlingensmithD (2007) ‘One Valley and a Thousand’: Dams, Nationalism, and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
LatourB (1990) Drawing things together. In: LynchMWoolgarS (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 19–68.
33.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
McPheeJ (1980) Encounters with the Archdruid. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
35.
Mekong Committee (1961) Brief description of the Pa Mong project. Bangkok: Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE), 30June.
36.
MiddletonCGarciaJForanT (2009) Old and new hydropower players in the Mekong region: Agendas and strategies’. In: MolleFForanTKakonenM (eds) Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance. London: Earthscan, 23–45.
37.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
NegaTH (2008) Saving wild rice: The rise and fall of Nett Lake Dam. Environment and History14: 5–39.
39.
NguyenTD (1999) The Mekong River and the Struggle for Indochina: Water, War, and Peace. Westport, CT: Prager.
40.
NishiiYGoF (2011) China using development aid to spearhead Asian push. The Asahi Shimbun, 26January. Available at: www.cam111.com/photonews/2011/01/26/74545.html (accessed 19 February 2012).
41.
O’NeillK (2006) Rivers by Design: State Power and the Origins of U.S. Flood Control. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
Ó TuathailG (2006) General introduction: Thinking critically about geopolitics. In: Ó TuathailGDalbySRoutledgeP (eds) The Geopolitics Reader, 2nd edition.New York, NY: Routledge, 1–14.
43.
PalmerW (1963) Memorandum to Secretary of the Interior re: Foreign activities – foreign assistance program, 15February1963. NARA Regional Office, Denver, CO, RG115, Foreign Activities, Box 14.
44.
PapadopoulosD (2011) Alter-ontologies: Towards a constituent politics in technoscience. Social Studies of Science41(2): 177–201.
45.
PhadkeR (2002) Assessing water scarcity and watershed development in Maharashtra, India: A Case Study of the Baliraja Memorial Dam. Science, Technology, & Human Values27(2): 236–261.
46.
PrattG (1953) Foreign Activities of the Bureau of Reclamation. Unpublished paper. Federal Records Center, Denver, CO.
47.
ReisnerM (1986) Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. New York: Viking Press.
SchatzkiT (2003) Nature and technology in history. History and Theory42(4): 82–93.
50.
SlaterD (2004) Geopolitics and the Post-Colonial: Rethinking North–South Relations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
51.
SneddonC (2003) Reconfiguring scale and power: The Khong-Chi-Mun project in Northeast Thailand. Environment and Planning A35(12): 2229–2250.
52.
SneddonCFoxC (2006) Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography25(2): 181–202.
53.
SneddonCFoxC (2011) The Cold War, the US Bureau of Reclamation, and the technopolitics of river basin development, 1950–1970. Political Geography30(8): 450–460.
54.
StammG (1969) Bureau of Reclamation international technical assistance in development of arid lands. Paper presented at the International Conference on Arid Lands in a Changing World, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Tucson, AZ, 3–13 June.
55.
SterlingC (1971a) Thai–Laos dam plan is perfect one – except for why?Washington Post, 1May, p. A14.
56.
SterlingC (1971b) 40-Odd dams hold promise for great Mekong basin. Washington Post, 24April, p. A18.
57.
StineJTarrJ (1998) At the intersection of histories: Technology and the environment. Technology and Culture39: 601–640.
58.
ThorskyGN (1973) International cooperation in Developing Water Resources. USDI, BR, Engineering and Research Center, Denver, CO. Paper presented at the First World Congress on Water Resources, Chicago, IL, 24–28 September.
59.
United States Agency for International Development (1968) To Tame a River. Washington, DC: USAID.
60.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1956) Reconnaissance Report: Lower Mekong River Basin. Prepared for International Cooperation Administration, United States Bureau of Reclamation, March.
61.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1962) Preliminary Study, Pa Mong Project, Thailand–Laos, January1962. Denver, CO: United States Bureau of Reclamation.
62.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1965) Mekong Pa Mong Survey (Phase I): Interim Report. June1965. Denver, CO: United States Bureau of Reclamation.
63.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1966) Pa Mong Project (Lower Mekong River Basin), Phase I Report, Volume 2, Appendix I (Agreements). Denver, CO: United States Bureau of Reclamation, March.
64.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (1970) Pa Mong Project, Stage One, Phase II (Executive Summary). Denver, CO: United States Bureau of Reclamation.
65.
WescoatJSmithRSchaadD (1992) Visits to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation from South Asia and the Middle East, 1946–1990: An indicator of changing international program and politics. Irrigation and Drainage Systems6: 55–67.
66.
WestadOA (2003) The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
WhiteDWilbertC (2006) Introduction: Technonatural time-spaces. Science as Culture15(2): 95–104.
68.
WhiteH (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
WhiteR (1995) The Organic Machine. New York: Hill and Wang.
70.
WinnerL (1980) Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus109(1): 121–136.
71.
WorsterD (1992) Rivers of Empire: Water, Aridity, and the Growth of the American West. New York: Oxford University Press.
