Collins HM and Pinch TJ ( 2008[1982]) Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge.
2.
Cross A. ( 1991) The crisis in physics: Dialectical materialism and quantum theory. Social Studies of Science21: 735-759.
3.
Dear P. ( 2001) Science studies as epistemography. In: Labinger J and Collins H (eds) The One Culture: A Conversation About Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 128-141.
4.
Fernandes L. ( 1997) Producing Workers: The Politics of Gender, Class, and Culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Forstner C. ( 2008) The early history of David Bohm’s quantum mechanics through the perspective of Ludwik Fleck’s thought collectives. Minerva46(2): 216-229.
6.
Harvey B. ( 1981) Plausibility and the evaluation of knowledge: A case-study of experimental quantum mechanics. Social Studies of Science11: 95-130.
7.
Jammer M. ( 1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. New York : John Wiley.
8.
Kaiser D. ( 2009) How the Hippies Saved Physics. Unpublished book proposal, Program in Science, Technology & Society, MIT.
9.
Pickering A. ( 1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
Labinger J and Collins H (eds) (2001) The One Culture: A Conversation About Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11.
Pinch T. ( 1976) Hidden variables, impossibility proofs and paradoxes: A sociological study of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Manchester.
12.
Pinch T. ( 1977) What does a proof do if it does not prove? A study of the social conditions and metaphysical divisions leading to David Bohm and John von Neumann failing to communicate in quantum mechanics. In: Mendelsohn E, Weingart P and Whitley RD (eds) The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Reidel, 171-215.
