Ethnography has been successfully deployed in science and technology studies, and more specifically in laboratory studies. By using co-presence rather than co-location as a starting point to conceptualize and articulate fieldwork, new aspects of knowledge production are foregrounded in ethnographic studies. This research note proposes and discusses co-presence as an epistemic strategy that pays close attention to non-lab based knowledge production that can embrace textuality, infrastructure and mediation, and that draws into relief the role of ethnographer as author, participant-observer and scholar. Furthermore, co-presence as an approach to doing fieldwork generates new prospects for the study of knowledge production. It enables STS to develop the ethnographic study of highly mediated, distributed or non-lab-based fields, such as the humanities, e-research and e-science.
Alac, Morana ( 2008) ‘Working with Brain Scans: Digital Images and Gestural Interaction in fMRI Laboratory’, Social Studies of Science38(4): 483-508.
2.
Amit, Vered (ed.) (2000) Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World (London andNew York: Routledge).
3.
Beaulieu, Anne ( 2004) ‘Meditating Ethnography: Objectivity and the Making of Ethnographies of the Internet’, Social Epistemology18(2-3):139-64.
4.
Beaulieu, Anne & Adolfo Estalella ( 2009) ‘Rethinking Research Ethics for Mediated Settings’ , in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science (Cologne, Germany: National Centre for E-Social Science): 1-15.
5.
Beaulieu, Anne & Mette Terp Høybye (in press, 2010) ‘Studying Mailing Lists: Text, Temporality, Interaction and Materiality at the Intersection of Email and the Web’ , in S. Hessse-Biber (ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6.
Beaulieu, Anne, Andrea Scharnhorst & Paul Wouters ( 2007) ‘Not Another Case Study: Ethnography, Formalisation and the Scope of Science’, Science, Technology and Human Values32(6): 672-92.
7.
Behar, Ruth ( 1996) The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks your Heart. (Boston: Beacon Press ).
8.
Boellstorff, Tom ( 2008) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human (Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press).
9.
Bolter, Jay D. & Richard Grusin ( 2000) Remediation: Understanding New Media ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
10.
Bruns, Axel ( 2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second life, and Beyond: from Production to Produsage (New York: Peter Lang ).
11.
Callon, Michel ( 2002) ‘Writing and (Re)writing Devices as Tools for Managing Complexity’, in J. Law & A. Mol (eds), Complexities in Science, Technology and Medicine (Durham, NC, Duke University Press): 191-217.
12.
Copier, Marinka ( 2007) Beyond the Magic Circle: A Network Perspective on Role-Play in Online Games. PhD Thesis, Utrecht University , The Netherlands.
13.
De Laet, Marianne & Annemarie Mol ( 2000) ‘The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology’ , Social Studies of Science30(2): 225-63.
14.
Derksen, Maarten ( 1997) ‘Are We Not Experimenting Then? The Rhetorical Demarcation of Psychology and Common Sense’, Theory & Psychology7(4): 435-56.
15.
Dirksen, Vanessa ( 2007) Social Imaginaries of Technology and Work: A Connective Ethnography. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16.
Doing, Park ( 2007) ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise a Discipline: The Past, Present and Future Politics of Laboratory Studies in STS’ , in E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 279-95.
17.
Fay, Michaela ( 2007) ‘Mobile Subjects, Mobile Methods: Doing Virtual Ethnography in a Feminist Online Network’, FQS: Forum: Qualitative Social Research8(3): article 14. Available at < http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/278> ; (accessed 31 May 2009).
18.
Fujimura, Joan & Michael Fortun ( 1996) ‘Constructing Knowledge Across Social Worlds: The Case of DNA Sequence Databases in Molecular Biology’, in L. Nader (ed.), Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge (New York : Routledge): 160-73.
19.
Gajjala, Radhika ( 2002) ‘An Interrupted Postcolonial/Feminist Cyberethnography: Complicity and Resistance in the "Cyberfield"’, Feminist Media Studies2(2): 177-93.
20.
Gieryn, Thomas F. ( 2006) ‘City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies’, Social Studies of Science36(1): 5-38.
21.
Goffman, Erving ( 1957) ‘Alienation from Interaction’, Human Relations10: 47-60.
22.
Goffman, Erving ( 1971) ‘The Territories of the Self’, in E. Goffman, Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order (London: Allen Lane Penguin Press): 28-61.
23.
Gupta, Akhil & James Ferguson ( 1997) ‘Discipline and Practice: "The Field" as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology’, in A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (eds), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science ( Berkeley: University of California Press): 1-46.
24.
Halstead, Narmala, Eric Hirsch & Judith Okely (eds) ( 2008) Knowing How to Know: Fieldwork and the Ethnographic Present (New York: Berghahn Books ).
25.
Haraway, Donna ( 1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives’, Feminist Studies14(3): 575-99.
26.
Heath, Deborah, Erin Koch, Barbara Ley & Michael Montoya ( 1999) ‘Nodes and Queries: Linking Locations in Networked Fields of Inquiry’, American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 450-63.
27.
Hess, David ( 2001) ‘Ethnography and the Development of Science and Technology Studies’, in P. Atkinson , A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland & L. Lofland (eds), Handbook of Ethnography (London: Sage): 234-45.
28.
Henke, Christopher & Thomas Gieryn ( 2007) ‘Sites of Scientific Practice: The Enduring Importance of Place’, in E. J. Hackett , O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 355-76.
Hine, Christine ( 2002) ‘Cyberscience and Social Boundaries: The Implications of Laboratory Talk on the Internet’Sociological Research Online7(2) <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/hine.html> ;.
31.
Hine, Christine (ed.) (2006a) New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science ( Hershey, USA: Idea Group Inc.).
32.
Hine, Christine ( 2006b) ‘Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work’, Social Studies of Science36(2): 269-98.
33.
Hine, Christine ( 2007) ‘Connective Ethnography for the Exploration of E-science’ , Journal of Computer Mediated Communication12(2): online, < http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/hine.html> ;.
34.
Hine, Christine ( 2008) Systematics as Cyberscience: Computers, Change, and Continuity in Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).
35.
Ito, Mitzuko & Daisuke Okabe ( 2005) ‘Technosocial Situations’, in M. Ito, D. Okabe & M. Matsuda (eds), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 257-73.
36.
Jensen, Casper Bruun ( 2006) ‘Virtual Ethnography and the Study of Partially Existing Objects: The Case of ICT4DEV’, Paper prepared for workshop Virtual Ethnography in Contemporary Social Science , Virtual Knowledge Studio, Amsterdam , The Netherlands, (27-29 September).
37.
Jensen, Casper Bruun ( 2007) ‘Sorting Attachments: Usefulness of STS in Healthcare Practice and Policy’, Science as Culture16(3): 237-51.
38.
Kerr, Anne, Sarah Cunningham-Burley & Richard Tutton ( 2007) ‘Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue’, Social Studies of Science37(3): 385-411.
39.
Knorr, Karin ( 1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon).
40.
Knorr Cetina, Karin ( 1995) ‘Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science’, in S. Jasanoff , G. Markle, J. Peterson & T. Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (London: Sage ):140-66.
41.
Knorr Cetina, Karin ( 1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
42.
Knorr Cetina, Karin & Urs Bruegger ( 2000) ‘The Market as an Object of Attachment: Exploring Postsocial Relations in Financial Markets’, Canadian Journal of Sociology25(2): 141-68.
43.
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar ( 1986 [1979]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press [London: Sage, 1979]).
44.
Lynch, Michael ( 1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory (London : Routledge and Kegan Paul).
45.
Lynch, Michael ( 1991) ‘Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures’, Science in Context4: 51-78.
46.
Mackenzie, Adrian ( 2003) ‘These Things Called Systems: Collective Imaginings and Infrastructural Software’, Social Studies of Science33(3): 365-87.
47.
Metcalf, Peter ( 2002) They Lie, We Lie: Getting on with Ethnography ( London: Routledge).
48.
Merz, Martina ( 2006) ‘The Topicality of the Difference Thesis: Revisiting Constructivism and the Laboratory’, Science, Technology & Innovation Studies1: 11-24.
49.
Miller, Daniel & Don Slater ( 2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach ( Oxford: Berg).
50.
Mody, Cyrus ( 2005) ‘The Sounds of Science: Listening to Laboratory Practice’, Science, Technology and Human Values30(2): 175-98.
51.
Mol, Annemarie & John Law ( 1994)’Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology’, Social Studies of Science24(4): 641-71.
52.
Mortensen, Torril & Jill Walker ( 2002) ‘Blogging Thoughts: Personal Publication as an Online Research Tool’, Chapter 11 of A. Morrison (ed.), Researching ICTs in Context. ( Oslo: InterMedia University of Oslow ): 249-79.
53.
Myers, Natasha ( 2008) ‘Molecular Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography’, Social Studies of Science38(2): 163-99.
54.
Newman, Susan ( 1998) ‘Here, There, and Nowhere at All: Distribution, Negotiation, and Virtuality in Postmodern Engineering and Ethnography’ , Knowledge and Society11: 235-67.
55.
Olson, Gary, Anne Zimmerman & Nathan Bos ( 2008) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
56.
Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
57.
Pollner, Melvin ( 2002) ‘Inside the Bubble: Communion, Cognition, and Deep Play at the Intersection of Wall Street and Cyberspace’, in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ): 230-46.
58.
Rabinow, Paul ( 2003) Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment ( Princeton, US: Princeton University Press).
59.
Riles, Annelise ( 2001) The Network Inside Out (Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press).
60.
Riles, Annelise ( 2006) ‘Introduction: in Response’, in A. Riles (ed.), Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge (Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press): 1-40.
61.
Schlecker, Markus & Eric Hirsch ( 2001) ‘Incomplete Knowledge: Ethnography and the Crisis of Context in Studies of Media, Science and Technology’, History of the Human Sciences14: 69-87.
62.
Schaap, Frank ( 2001) The Words That Took Us There: Ethnography in a Virtual Reality (Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers).
63.
Sommerlund, Julie ( 2006) ‘Classifying Microorganisms: The Multiplicity of Classifications and Research Practices in Molecular Microbial Ecology’ , Social Studies of Science36(6): 909-28.
64.
Stanley, Liz ( 2001) ‘Mass-Observation’s Fieldwork Methods’ , in P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Coffey, J. Lofland & L. Lofland (eds), Handbook of Ethnography (London : Sage): 92-108.
65.
Star, Susan Leigh ( 1999) ‘The Ethnography of Infrastructure’ , American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377-91.
66.
Strathern, Marilyn ( 2004) Partial Connections, Updated Edition ( Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press).
67.
Taylor, T.L. ( 1999) ‘Life in Virtual Worlds: Plural Existence, Multimodalities, and other Online Research Challenges’, American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 436-49.
68.
Taylor, T.L. ( 2006) Play Between Worlds: Exploring Online Game Culture ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
69.
Taylor, T.L. & Beth E. Kolko ( 2003) ‘Boundary Space: Majestic and the Uncertain Status of Knowledge, Community and Self in a Digital Age’, Information, Communication & Society6(4): 497-522.
70.
Timmermans, Stefan ( 2003) ‘A Black Technician and Blue Babies’ , Social Studies of Science33(2): 197-229.
71.
Traweek, Sharon ( 1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics (London: Harvard University Press ).
72.
Tyler, Stephen ( 1986) ‘Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document’, in J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (eds), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography ( Berkeley: University of California Press ): 122-40.
73.
Urry, John ( 2003) ‘Social Networks, Travel and Talk’ , British Journal of Sociology54(2): 155-75.
74.
Van House, Nancy A. ( 2002) ‘Trust and Epistemic Communities in Biodiversity Data Sharing’, ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries , Portland, OR, July 2002, Proceedings: 231-39.
75.
Vinck, Dominique ( 2007) ‘Retour sur le laboratoire comme espace de production des connaissances’, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances2(2): 159-65.
76.
Vinck, Dominique & Gloria Zarma ( 2007) ‘La fusion de laboratoires. Processus de gestion et constitution d’une entité pertinente de l’activité scientifique’, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances2(2): 267-96.
77.
Virtual Knowledge Studio for the Humanities and Social Sciences (VKS) (2007) ‘Messy Shapes of Knowledge: STS Explores Informatization, New Media, and Academic Work’, in E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J.Wajcman (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 319-51.
78.
Voskuhl, Adelheid ( 2004) ‘Humans, Machines, and Conversations: An Ethnographic Study of the Making of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies’ , Social Studies of Science34(3): 393-421.
79.
Wakeford, Nina ( 2000) ‘New Media, New Methodologies: Studying the Web’ , in D. Gauntlett (ed.), Web Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age ( London: Arnold Publishers): 31-43.
80.
Waterton, Claire ( 2002) ‘From Field to Fantasy: Classifying Nature, Constructing Europe’, Social Studies of Science32(2): 177-204.
81.
Woolgar, Steve & Catelijne Coopmans ( 2006) ‘Virtual Witnessing in a Virtual Age: A Prospectus for Social Studies of E-science’, in C. Hine (ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production (Hershey, USA: Idea Group): 1-25.
82.
Zhao, Shanyang & David Elesh ( 2008) ‘Copresence as "Being With": Social Contact in Online Public Domains’, Information, Communication & Society11(4): 564-83.
