Best, Joel
(1993) ‘But Seriously Folks: The Limitations of
the Strict Constructionist Interpretation of Social
Problems’, in
J. A. Holstein
&
G. Miller
(eds), Reconsidering Social Constructionism (
Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter
): 129-150.
2.
Bijker, Wiebe
(1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
3.
Eden, Lynn
(2004) Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge,
& Nuclear Weapons Devastation (
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
).
4.
Garfinkel, Harold
&
Harvey Sacks
(1970) ‘On Formal Structures of Practical
Actions’, in
J. C. McKinney
&
E. A. Tiryakian
(eds), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Development (
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
): 337-366.
5.
Gieryn, Thomas
(1983)
‘Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science:
Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’
, American Sociological Review48:
781-795
.
6.
Goffman, Erving
(1974) Frame Analysis (
New York: Harper and Rowe
).
7.
Katz, J.
(2001 [1997]) ‘Ethnography’s
Warrants’, in
Robert M. Emerson
(ed.), Contemporary Field Research: Perspective and Method,
2nd edn (
Longrove, IL: Waveland Press
): 361-382.
8.
Nader, Laura
(1969) ‘Up the Anthropologist - Perspectives
Gained from Studying Up’, in
D. Hymes
(ed.), Reinventing Anthropology (
New York: Vintage
): 284-311.
9.
Vaughan, Diane
(1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology,
Culture, and Deviance at NASA (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
10.
Woolgar, Steve
&
Dorothy Pawluch
(1985)
‘Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations’
, Social Problems32:
214-227
.
