Using the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population and Development as a case study, this
paper challenges standard approaches to understanding political consensus. Neither
cognitive, social, nor strategic, consensus can be rethought as a metaphor for
‘getting along’ within a structured disunity. Structure derives
from commitment to a socio-technical network, while disunity arises from the
interpretive flexibility and varied practices contained within this network. The
Cairo Consensus is then explored through a central site of production: international
demographic surveys. These surveys help to build a stable network, and thus
facilitate consensus, by helping to establish epistemic communities, producing
standard representations of Third World fertility, and standardizing political
discourses of legitimacy and accountability.
Agre, Philip E.
(1995) ‘
From High Tech to Human Tech: Empowerment, Measurement, and Social Studies
of Computing
’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work3(2):
167–195
.
2.
Barrett, Deborah
&
David John Frank
(1999) ‘Population Control for National
Development: From World Discourse to National Policies’, in
J. Boli
&
G. M. Thomas
(eds), Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental
Organizations since 1875(
Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press): 198–221.
3.
Barroso, Carmen
&
Jodi L. Jacobson
(2000) ‘Population Policy and Women's
Empowerment: Challenges and Opportunities’, in
H.B. Presser
&
G. Sen
(eds), Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving
Beyond Cairo (
New York: Oxford University
Press): 351–376.
4.
Batliwala, Srilatha
(1994) ‘The Meaning of Women's
Empowerment: New Concepts from Action’, in
G. Sen
,
A. Germain
&
L.C. Chen
(eds), Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and
Rights (
Boston, MA: Harvard University
Press): 127–138.
5.
Beck, Ulrich
(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (
London: Sage Publications).
6.
Bimber, Bruce
&
David H. Guston
(1995) ‘Politics by the Same Means: Government
and Science in the United States’, in
S. Jasanoff
,
G. Markle
,
J. Petersen
&
T. Pinch
(eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications): 393–443.
7.
Boli, John
&
George M. Thomas
(eds) (1999) Constructing World Culture: International
Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875 (
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
8.
Bongaarts, John
&
Judith Bruce
(1995) ‘
The Causes of Unmet Need for Contraception and the Social Content of Services
’, Studies in Family Planning26:
57–75
.
9.
Bowker, Geoffrey
&
Susan Leigh Star
(1997) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its
Consequences (
Saint Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
10.
Brady, James R.
,
Stan Becker
,
John G. Haaga
&
Sally K. Stansfield
(1996) Midterm Evaluation of the Demographic and Health
Surveys Project (DHS-III) (936-3023)(
Arlington, VA: Population Technical Assistance Project).
11.
Callon, Michel
(1995) ‘Four Models for the Dynamics of
Science’, in
S. Jasanoff
,
G. Markle
,
J. Petersen
&
T. Pinch
(eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies(
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications): 29–63.
12.
Campbell, David
(1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the
Politics of Identity (
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
13.
Chabbott, Colette
(2003) Constructing Educational Development: International DevelopmentOrganizations and the World Conference on Education for All (
London & New York: Garland).
14.
Clarke, Adele E.
(2000) ‘Maverick Reproductive Scientists and the
Production of Contraceptives, c1915-2000’, in
A. Saetnan
,
N. Oudshoorn
&
M. Kirjczyk
(eds), Localizing and Globalizing Reproductive Technologies(
Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).
15.
Cleland, John
&
Chris Scott
(eds) (1987) The World Fertility Survey: An Assessment (
New York and London: Oxford University Press).
16.
Corrêa, Sonia
(1994) Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist
Perspectives from the South(
Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Books/DAWN).
17.
Crane, Barbara B.
(1993) ‘International Population Institutions:
Adaptation to a Changing World Order’, in
P. Haas
,
R.O. Keohane
&
M.A. Levy
(eds), Institutions for the Earth(
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 351–393.
18.
Demographic and Health Surveys
(1995) Interviewer's Manual: For Use with
Model “A” Questionnaire for High Contraceptive
Prevalence Countries (
Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.).
19.
Demographic and Health Surveys
(1999) Women's Status Module (
Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.).
20.
Desrosières, Alain
(1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of
Statistical Reasoning (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
21.
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth
&
Adrienne Germain
(1992) ‘
Stalking the Elusive “Unmet Need” for Family Planning
’, Studies in Family Planning23(5):
330–335
.
22.
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth
&
Adrienne Germain
(2000) ‘Reproductive Health and Demographic
Imagination’, in
H.B. Presser
&
G. Sen
(eds), Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving
Beyond Cairo (
New York: Oxford University
Press): 69–94.
23.
Donaldson, Peter J.
(1990) Nature Against Us: The United States and the World PopulationCrisis, 1965–1980 (
Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press).
24.
Drori, Gili S.
,
John W. Meyer
,
Francisco O. Ramirez
&
Evan Schofer
(2003) Science in the Modern World Polity:
Institutionalization and Globalization (
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
25.
Ezrahi, Yaron
(1990) The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation
of Contemporary Democracy (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
26.
Finkle, Jason L.
&
Barbara B. Crane
(1990) ‘The Politics of International Population
Policy’, International Transmission of Population Policy
Experience, Proceedings of the Expert Group Meeting on the International
Transmission of Population Policy Experience(
New York: United Nations
): 167–183.
27.
Finkle, Jason L.
&
C. Alison McIntosh
(eds) (1994) The New Politics of Population: Conflict and
Consensus in Family Planning, Supplement edn (
New York: The Population Council).
28.
Foucault, Michel
(1971) The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human
Sciences (
New York: Pantheon Books).
29.
Foucault, Michel
(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (
New York: Vintage Books).
30.
Foucault, Michel
(1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (
New York: Vintage Books).
31.
Frank, David John
(1999) ‘
The Social Bases of Environmental Treaty Ratification
, 1900–1990’, Sociological Inquiry69:
523–550
.
32.
Fujimura, Joan
(1992) ‘Crafting Science: Standardized Packages,
Boundary Objects, and “Translation”’, in
A. Pickering
(ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press): 168–211.
33.
Fujimura, Joan
(1995) ‘Ecologies of Action: Recombining Genes,
Molecularizing Cancer, and Transforming Biology’, in
S.L. Star
(ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and
Technology (
Albany, NY: SUNY Press): 302–346.
34.
Gilbert, Nigel
&
Michael Mulkay
(1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological
Analysis of Scientists' Discourse (
New York: Cambridge University Press).
35.
Greenhalgh, Susan
(1996) ‘
The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual,
Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography
’, Journal of Society and History38:
26–66
.
36.
Haas, Peter M.
(1992) ‘
Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination
’, International Organization46 (Winter):
1–35
.
37.
Hacking, Ian
(1986) ‘Making up
Individuals’, in
T.C. Heller
,
D.E. Wellbury
&
M. Sosna
(eds), Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the
Self in Western Thought (
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
38.
Hacking, Ian
(2002) Historical Ontology (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
39.
Hajer, Maarten A.
(1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological
Modernization and the Policy Process (
Oxford and New York: Clarendon).
40.
Halfon, Saul
(1997) ‘Over-Populating the World: Notes toward
a Discursive Reading’, in
P. Taylor
,
S. Halfon
&
P. Edwards
(eds), Changing Life: Genomes, Ecologies, Bodies, Commodities (
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
41.
Hartmann, Betsy
(1995) Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of
Population Control, revised edn (
Boston, MA: South End Press).
42.
Higer, Amy (1997) Transnational Movements and World Politics: The
International Women's Health Movement and Population Policy. PhD
Dissertation, Brandeis University.
43.
Hodgson, Dennis
(1988) ‘
Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography
’, Population and Development Review14(4):
541–569
.
44.
Jasanoff, Sheila
(ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of
Science and Social Order (
New York: Routledge).
45.
Johnson, Stanley
(1995) The Politics of Population: The International
Conference on Population and Development, Cairo 1994 (
London: Earthscan Publications).
46.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin
(1999) Epistemic Cultures: How Sciences Make Knowledge (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
47.
Latour, Bruno
(1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and
Engineers through Society (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
48.
Latour, Bruno
(1993) We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
49.
Law, John
(1999) ‘After ANT: Complexity, Naming and
Topology’, in
J. Law
&
J. Hassard
(eds), Actor Network Theory and After (
Malden, MA: Blackwell/The Sociological
Review): 1–14.
50.
Law, John
&
Michel Callon
(1995) ‘Engineering and Sociology in a Military
Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological
Change’, in
S.L. Star
(ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and
Technology (
Albany, NY: SUNY Press): 281–301.
51.
Litfin, Karen T.
(1994) Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global EnvironmentalCooperation (
New York: Columbia University Press).
52.
Lynch, Michael
(1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of
Shop Work and ShopTalk in a Research Laboratory (
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
53.
Mamdani, Mahmood
(1972) The Myth of Population Control: Family, Caste, and
Class in an Indian Village (
New York: Monthly Review Press).
54.
Miller, Clark
&
Paul Edwards
(eds) (2001) Changing the Atmosphere(
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
55.
Mintzes, Barbara
,
Anita Hardon
&
Jannemieke Hanhort
(1993) Norplant: Under Her Skin (
Amsterdam: Women's Health Action Foundation).
56.
Morris, Leo
,
G. Lewis
,
D.L. Powell
,
J. Anderson
,
A. Way
,
J. Crushing
&
G. Lawless
(1981) ‘Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys: A New
Source of Family Planning Data’, Population
Reports, Series M(5).
57.
Mueller, Adele
(1986) ‘
The Bureaucratization of Feminist Knowledge: The Case of Women in Development
’, Resources for Feminist Research15(1):
36–38
.
58.
Oudshoorn, Nelly
(1994) Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex
Hormones (
London: Routledge).
59.
Oudshoorn, Nelly
(1997) ‘
From Population Control Politics to Chemicals: The WHO as an Intermediary
Organization in Contraceptive Development
’, Social Studies of Science27:
41–72
.
60.
Parpart, Jane L.
,
Shirin M. Rai
&
Kathleen Staudt
(2002) Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a
Global/Local World (
New York: Routledge).
61.
Pinch, Trevor
(1986) Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar Neutrino
Detection (
Dordrecht: Reidel).
62.
Porter, Theodore M.
(1995) Trust in Numbers (
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
63.
Presser, Harriet B.
(2000) ‘Appendix: Demography, Feminism, and the
Science-Policy Nexus’, in
H.B. Presser
&
G. Sen
(eds), Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving
Beyond Cairo (
New York: Oxford University
Press): 377–412.
64.
Presser, Harriet B.
&
Gita Sen
(eds) (2000) Women's Empowerment and DemographicProcesses: Moving Beyond Cairo (
New York: Oxford University Press).
65.
Price, Don
(1965) The Scientific Estate (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
66.
Price, Richard
(1997) The Chemical Weapons Taboo (
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
67.
Ravenholt, Reimart T.
(1984)
‘World Fertility Survey: Origin and Development of the WFS’
, paper presented at The WFS Symposium,
London 1984.
68.
Riedmann, Agnes
(1993) Science That Colonizes: A Critique of Fertility
Studies in Africa (
Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
69.
Rose, Nikolas
(1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private
Self (
New York: Routledge).
70.
Scott, James C.
(1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve
the HumanCondition Have Failed (
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
71.
Sen, Gita
&
Caren Grown
(1987) Development, Crises, and Alternative Visions: Third WorldWomen's Perspectives (
New York: Monthly Review Press).
72.
Sen, Gita
&
Rachel Snow
(1994) Power and Decision: The Social Control of
Reproduction (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
73.
Sinding, Steven W.
,
John A. Ross
&
Allan G. Rosenfield
(1994) ‘
Seeking Common Ground: Unmet Need and Demographic Goals
’, International Family Planning Perspectives20(1):
23–27
.
74.
Star, Susan Leigh
(1988) ‘The Structure of Ill-Structured
Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem
Solving’, in
M. Huhns
&
L. Gasser
(eds), Distributed Artificial Intelligence (
Menlo Park, CA: Morgan
Kauffman): 37–54.
75.
Star, Susan Leigh
(1989) Regions of Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for
Scientific Certainty (
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
76.
Star, Susan Leigh
&
James R. Griesemer
(1989) ‘
Institutional Ecologies, “Translations” and Boundary
Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39
’, Social Studies of Science19(3):
387–420
.
77.
Szreter, Simon
(1993) ‘
The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility Change: A
Critical Intellectual History
’, Population and Development Review19(4):
659–701
.
78.
Thomas, George M.
,
John W. Meyer
,
Francisco O. Ramirez
&
John Boli
(eds) (1987) Institutional Structure: Constituting State,
Society, and the Individual (
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications).
79.
Van der Sluijs
,
Jeroen
,
Josee van Eijendhoven
,
Simon Shackley
&
Brian Wynne
(1998) ‘
Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus around
Climate Sensitivity
’, Social Studies of Science28(2):
291–323
.
80.
Warwick, Donald P.
(1983) ‘The KAP Survey: Dictates of Mission
Versus Demands of Science’, in
M. Bulmer
&
D. P. Warwick
(eds), Social Science Research in Developing Countries (
New York: John Wiley &
Sons): 349–363.
81.
Westoff, Charles F.
(1978) ‘
The Unmet Need for Birth Control in Five Asian Countries
’, Family Planning Perspectives10(3):
173–181
.
82.
Yinger, Nancy, Anne Peterson & Michal Avni (1999)
‘Mainstreaming Gender in Monitoring and Evaluation: A Practical Approach
for Reproductive Health Programming. Draft’. Paper presented at the
Interagency Gender Working Group, Third Plenary Meeting, Resource Document,
Washington, DC.
