This paper concentrates upon the relationship between marriage, parental status, and
publication productivity for women in academic science, with comparisons to men.
Findings indicate that gender, family characteristics, and productivity are complex
considerations that go beyond being married or not married, and the presence or
absence of children. For women particularly, the relationship between marriage and
productivity varies by type of marriage: first compared with subsequent
marriage, and occupation of spouse (in scientific compared with non-scientific
occupation). Further, type of family composition is important: women with preschool
children have higher productivity than women without children or with school-age
children. Women with preschool children are found to be a socially selective group
in their characteristics, particularly in their allocations of time.
Astin, Helen
&
Diane Davis
(1985) ‘Research Productivity Across the Life-
and Career-Cycles: Facilitators and Predictors for Women’, in
M.F. Fox
(ed.), Scholarly Writing and Publishing: Issues, Problems, and
Solutions (
Boulder, CO: Westview
): 147-160.
2.
Astin, Helen
&
Jeffrey Milem
(1997) ‘The Status of Academic Couples in U.S.
Institutions’, in
M.A. Ferber
&
J.W. Loeb
(eds), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises (
Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
): 128-155.
3.
Blackburn, Robert
&
Janet Lawrence
(1996) Faculty at Work (
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
).
4.
Bruer, John
(1984)
‘Women in Science: Toward Equitable Participation’
, Science, Technology, and Human Values9:
3-7
.
5.
Clark, Mary Jo
&
John A. Centra
(1985)
‘Influences on the Career Accomplishments of Ph.D.s’
, Research in Higher Education23:
256-269
.
6.
Cole, Jonathan R.
&
Burton Singer
(1991) ‘A Theory of Limited Differences:
Explaining the Productivity Puzzle in Science’, in
H. Zuckerman
,
J. Cole
&
J. Bruer
(eds), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community (
New York: W.W. Norton
): 277-10.
7.
Cole, Jonathan R.
&
Harriet Zuckerman
(1984) ‘The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and
Change in Patterns of Publication Among Men and Women
Scientists’, in
M.W. Steimkamp
&
M. Maehr
(eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 2 (
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
).
8.
Cole, Jonathan R.
&
Harriet Zuckerman
(1987)
‘Marriage, Motherhood, and Research Performance in Science’
, Scientific American255:
119-125
.
9.
Creamer, Elizabeth
(1998) Assessing Faculty Publication Productivity: Issues of
Equity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 26, no. 2 (
Washington, DC: The George Washington University
).
10.
Creamer, Elizabeth
(1999)
‘Knowledge Production, Publication Productivity, and Intimate
Academic Partnerships’
, Journal of Higher Education70 (May/June):
261-277
.
11.
Creswell, John W.
(1985) Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the
Sciences and Social Sciences, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 4 (
Washington, DC: Association for the Study of
Higher Education
).
12.
Fox, Mary Frank
(1992)
‘Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality
versus Competition in Academia’
, Sociology of Education65 (October):
293-305
.
13.
Fox, Mary Frank
&
Catherine Faver
(1985)
‘Women, Men, and Publication Productivity’
, Sociological Quarterly26:
537-549
.
14.
Grant, Linda
,
Ivy Kennelly
&
Kathryn Ward
(2000)
‘Revisiting the Gender, Marriage, and Parenthood Puzzle in
Scientific Careers’
, Women’s Studies Quarterly28 (spring/summer):
62-83
.
15.
Helmreich, Robert
,
Janet Spence
,
W.E. Beane
,
G.W. Lucker
&
K.A. Matthews
(1980)
‘Making It in Academic Psychology: Demographic and Personality
Correlates of Attainment’
, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39 (November):
896-908
.
16.
Kyvik, Svein
(1990)
‘Motherhood and Scientific Productivity’
, Social Studies of Science20:
149-160
.
17.
Long, J. Scott
(1987) ‘Discussion: Problems and Prospects for
Research on Sex Differences’, in
L.S. Dix
(ed.), Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in
Science and Engineering (
Washington, DC: National Research Council
): 157-169.
18.
Long, J. Scott
(1990)
‘The Origins of Sex Differences in Science’
, Social Forces68:
1297-1315
.
19.
Long, J. Scott
(1992)
‘Measures of Sex Differences in Science’
, Social Forces71:
159-178
.
20.
Long, J. Scott
&
Mary Frank Fox
(1995)
‘Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism’
, Annual Review of Sociology21:
45-71
.
21.
Lotka, A.J.
(1926)
‘The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity’
, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences26:
317-323
.
22.
Luukkonen-Gronow, Terttu
&
Veronica Stolte-Heiskanen
(1983)
‘Myths and Realities of Role Incompatibility of Women Scientists’
, Acta Sociologica26:
267-280
.
23.
Merton, Robert K.
(1973) ‘Priorities in Scientific
Discovery’, in
N.W. Storer
(ed.), The Sociology of Science (
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
).
24.
Mullins, Nicholas C.
(1973) Science: Some Sociological Perspectives (
Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill
).
25.
National Academy of Sciences
(1995) Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and
Engineers (
Washington, DC: National Academy Press
).
26.
Pearson, Willie
&
Alan Fechter
(1994) Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next
Generation (
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
).
27.
Pelz, Donald
&
Frank M. Andrews
(1976) Scientists in Organizations (
Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research,
The University of Michigan
).
28.
Price, Derek
(1963) Little Science, Big Science (
New York: Columbia University Press
).
29.
Reskin, Barbara
(1978)
‘Scientific Productivity, Sex, and Location in the Institution of Science’
, American Journal of Sociology83:
1235-1243
.
30.
Sonnert, Gerhard
&
Gerald Holton
(1995) Gender Differences in Science Careers (
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
).
31.
Zuckerman, Harriet
,
Jonathan Cole
&
John Bruer
(1991) The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific
Community (
New York: W.W. Norton
).
