Arksey, Hilary (1998) RSI and the Experts: The Construction of Medical Knowledge ( London: UCL Press ).
2.
Collins, H.M. (1996) `In Praise of Futile Gestures: How Scientific is the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge' , Social Studies of Science26(2): 229-244 .
3.
Collins, H.M. (forthcoming) ` “How Do You Know You've Alternated?” Reply to G. Stolzenberg, “Kinder, Gentler Science Wars”, review of Labinger & Collins (2001)' , Social Studies of Science.
4.
Collins, H.M. & Robert Evans (2002) `The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience' , Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235-296 .
5.
Collins, H.M. & M. Kusch (1998) The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).
6.
Collins, H.M. & T.J. Pinch (1981) `Rationality and Paradigm Allegiance in Extraordinary Science', in Hans Peter Duerr (ed.), The Scientist and the Irrational ( Frankfurt: Syndikat ): 284-306.
7.
Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science ( Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press ).
8.
Epstein, Steven (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge ( Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press ).
9.
Gorman, Michael (2002) `Levels of Expertise and Trading Zones' , Social Studies of Science32(6): 933-938 .
10.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2003) `Breaking the Waves in Science Studies' , Social Studies of Science33(3): 389-400 .
11.
Labinger, J. & H.M. Collins (2001) The One Culture?: A Conversation About Science ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ).
12.
Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts ( London: SAGE Publications ).
13.
Locke, Simon (1999) `Golem Science and the Public Understanding of Science: From Deficit to Dilemma' , Public Understanding of Science8: 75-92 .
14.
Lynch, Michael & Simon Cole (2002) `Judicial Metascience and the Credibility of Expert Evidence' , European Association for the Study of Science & Technology (EASST) Conference, University of York, UK (31 July - 3 August 2002).
15.
Medawar, Peter B. (1967) The Art of the Soluble ( London: Methuen ).
16.
Quine, Willard van Orman (1953) `Two Dogmas of Empiricism', in W.V.O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ): 20-46.
17.
Rip, Arie (2003) `Constructing Expertise in a Third Wave of Science Studies?' , Social Studies of Science33(3): 419-434 .
18.
Scott, Pam, Evelleen Richards & Brian Martin (1990) `Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies' , Science Technology and Human Values15(4): 474-494 .
19.
Stolzenberg, G. (forthcoming) `Get a New Mind But Keep the Old One'.
20.
Winch, Peter (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy ( London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ).
21.
Woodhouse, Edward, David Hess, Steve Breyman & Brian Martin (2002) `Science Studies and Activism: Possibilities and Problems for Reconstructivist Agendas' , Social Studies of Science32(2): 297-319 .
22.
Wynne, Brian (2003) `Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism' , Social Studies of Science33(3): 401-417 .