Existing studies of gender and lifecourse in science have not focused on publication decisions, and even less so for publication of studies liable to attract media and public attention. This paper is based on semi-structured interviews with 61 US toxic-exposure epidemiologists about their publication decisions. It examines gender differences in how scientists, as they move through the lifecourse, approach publication decisions for research bearing potential societal implications. Though preliminary, the data suggest that males are overall more comfortable than females with pursuing visible publication and handling media coverage. However, males and females may begin to crisscross over time. Specifically, males started out in publishing potentially controversial papers in visible journals likely to attract media and public attention, but grew more cautious with age, rank, and experience. Amongst females, the situation was less homogenous: while some (often, the most élite) reported patterns similar to males', more reported following the reverse pattern as they moved through the lifecourse. These differences may stem in part from gender differences in self-confidence, risk-taking, and competitiveness. The wider significance and limitations of the data are discussed, and lines of further research (including nine testable hypotheses) are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambroseet al. (1997) Susan A. Ambrose, Kristin L. Dunkle, Barbara B. Lazarus, Indira Nair and Deborah A. Harkus, Journeys of Women in Science and Engineering ( Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press ).
2.
Angell & Kassirer (1994) Marcia Angell and Jerome P. Kassirer, `Clinical Research - What Should the Public Believe?' [Editorial] , New England Journal of Medicine331 (21 July): 189-190 .
3.
Angier (1998) Natalie Angier, `Exploring the Gender Gap and the Absence of Equality' , New York Times (25 August): B10 .
4.
Bain (1933) Read Bain, `Scientist as Citizen' , Social Forces11: 412-415 .
5.
Barber (1962 [1952]) Bernard Barber, Science and the Social Order ( New York: Collier , rev. edn [1st edn 1952]).
6.
Barinaga (1993) Marcia Barinaga, `Is there a `Female Style' in Science?' , Science260 (16 April): 384-391 .
7.
Bazell (1990) Robert Bazell, `The Drink Link' , New Republic (7 May): 13 .
8.
Becker (1990) Betsy J. Becker, `Item Characteristics and Gender Differences on the SAT M for Mathematically Able Youths' , American Educational Research Journal27/1 (Spring): 65-87 .
9.
Belenkyet al. (1986) Mary F. Belenky, Blythe M. Clinchy, Nancy R. Goldberger and Jill M. Tarule, Women's Ways of Knowing ( New York: Basic Books ).
10.
Boffey, Rodgers & Schneider (1999) Philip M. Boffey, Joann Ellison Rodgers and Stephen H. Schneider, `Interpreting Uncertainty: A Panel Discussion', in Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody and Carol Rogers (eds), Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science ( Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates ): 81-91.
11.
Bordo (1987) Susan Bordo, `The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought', in Harding & O'Barr (1987): 247-264.
12.
Broad (1999) William J. Broad, `32 Nobel Laureates in Physics Back Atomic Test Ban' , New York Times (6 October): A-12 .
13.
Broad & Wade (1983) William Broad and Nicholas Wade, Betrayers of the Truth ( New York: Simon & Schuster ).
Brown & Gilligan (1992) Lyn M. Brown and Carol Gilligan, Meeting at the Crossroads (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
16.
Byrnes, Miller & Schafer (1999) James P. Byrnes, David C. Miller and William D. Schafer, `Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis' , Psychological Bulletin125/3: 367-383 .
17.
Campbell (1993) Anne Campbell, Men, Women, and Aggression ( New York: Basic Books ).
18.
Caplan (1995 [1993]) Paula J. Caplan, Lifting a Ton of Feathers: A Woman's Guide for Survivng in the Academic World ( Toronto: University of Toronto Press , pbk edn [hdbk edn 1993]).
19.
Chafetz (1999) Janet Saltzman Chafetz (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender ( New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum ).
20.
Chubin & Hackett (1990) Daryl E. Chubin and Edward J. Hackett, Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy ( Albany: State University of New York Press ).
21.
Cole (1979) Jonathan R. Cole, Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community ( New York: Free Press ).
22.
Cole (1988) Jonathan R. Cole, `Dietary Cholesterol and Heart Disease: The Construction of a Medical `Fact' ', in Hubert J. O'Gorman (ed.), Surveying Social Life ( Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press ): 437-466.
23.
Dan (1987) Bruce B. Dan, `One-Minute Medicine' , Journal of the American Medical Association257 (22/29 May): 2798 .
24.
Davis & Buffler (1992) Devra Lee Davis and Patricia Buffler, `Reduction of Deaths after Drug Labelling for Risk of Reye's Syndrome' [Letter] , The Lancet340 (24 October): 1042 .
25.
Doll (1987) Richard Doll, `Foreword', in Charles H. Hennekens and Julie E. Buring (ed. S.L. Mayrent), Epidemiology in Medicine ( Boston, MA: Little, Brown ): xi-xii.
26.
Dolnick (1992) Edward Dolnick, `It's Time to Say Good-bye to Guilty Eating' , Health (October): 39-49 .
27.
Dunwoody (1986) Sharon Dunwoody, `The Scientist as Source', in Friedman, Dunwoody & Rogers (1986): 3-16.
28.
Dunwoody & Scott (1982) Sharon Dunwoody and Byron T. Scott, `Scientists as Mass Media Sources' , Journalism Quarterly59 (Spring): 52-59 .
29.
Epstein (1992) Cynthia F. Epstein, `Constraints on Excellence: Structural and Cultural Barriers to the Recognition and Demonstration of Achievement', in Zuckerman, Cole & Bruer (1992): 239-258.
30.
Epstein (1999) Cynthia F. Epstein, `Similarity and Difference: The Sociology of Gender Distinctions', in Chafetz (1999): 46-61.
31.
Etzkowitz & Kemelgor (2001) Henry Etzkowitz and Carol Kemelgor, `Gender Inequality in Science: A Universal Condition?' , Minerva39/2 (Summer): 153-174 .
32.
Etzkowitz, Kemelgor & Uzzi (2000) Henry Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor and Brian Uzzi, Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).
33.
Fox (1995) Mary Frank Fox, `Women and Scientific Careers', in Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen and Trevor Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies ( Thousand Oaks, CA, London & New Delhi: Sage/4S ): 205-223.
34.
Fox (1999) Mary Frank Fox, `Gender, Hierarchy, and Science', in Chafetz (1999): 441-457.
35.
Fox & Stephan (2001) Mary Frank Fox and Paula E. Stephan, `Careers of Young Scientists: Preferences, Prospects and Realities by Gender and Field' , Social Studies of Science31/1 (February): 109-122 .
36.
Friedman, Dunwoody & Rogers (1986) Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody and Carol Rogers (eds), Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News ( New York: Free Press [AAAS Issues in Science and Technology Series]).
37.
Gallagher & De Lisi (1994) Ann M. Gallagher and Richard De Lisi, `Gender Differences in Scholastic Aptitude Test - Mathematics Problem Solving Among High-Ability Students' , Journal of Educational Psychology86/2 (June): 204-211 .
38.
Gilligan (1982) Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
39.
Gordon (1984) Michael D. Gordon, `How Authors Select Journals: A Test of the Reward Maximization Model of Submission Behaviour' , Social Studies of Science14/1 (February): 27-43 .
40.
Grant & Ward (1991) Linda Grant and Kathryn B. Ward, `Gender and Publishing in Sociology' , Gender & Society5/2 (June): 207-223 .
41.
Greely (2001) Henry T. Greely, `Human Genomics Research: New Challenges for Research Ethics' , Perspectives in Biology and Medicine44/2 (Winter): 221-229 .
42.
Grinnell (1992) Frederick Grinnell, The Scientific Attitude ( New York: Guilford Press , 2nd edn).
43.
Hagstrom (1975 [1965]) Warren O. Hagstrom, The Scientific Community ( Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press [1st edn, Basic Books, 1965]).
44.
Haraway (1989) Donna Haraway, Primate Visions ( New York: Routledge ).
45.
Haraway (1991) Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women ( New York: Routledge ).
46.
Hardey (1999) Michael Hardey, `Doctor in the House: The Internet as a Source of Lay Health Knowledge and the Challenge to Expertise' , Sociology of Health and Illness21/6 (November): 820-835 .
47.
Harding & O'Barr (1987) Sandra Harding and Jean F. O'Barr (eds), Sex and Scientific Inquiry ( Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press ).
48.
Holmes (1986) Lewis B. Holmes, `Vaginal Spermicides and Congenital Disorders: The Validity of a Study - in Reply' [Letter] , Journal of the American Medical Association256 (12 December): 3096 .
49.
Hull (1988) David L. Hull, Science as Process ( Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press ).
50.
Hull, Tessner & Diamond (1978) David L. Hull, Peter D. Tessner and Arthur M. Diamond, `Planck's Principle' , Science202 (17 November): 717-723 .
51.
Jauchem (1992) James R. Jauchem, `Epidemiologic Studies of Electric and Magnetic Fields and Cancer: A Case Study of Distortions by the Media' , Journal of Clinical Epidemiology45/10 (October): 1137-1142 .
52.
Kaback (2001) Michael M. Kaback, `The `Asilomar Process' and the Human Genome Project' , Perspectives in Biology and Medicine44/2 (Winter): 230-234 .
53.
Keithet al. (2002) Bruce Keith, Jenny S. Layne, Nicholas Babchuk and Kurt Johnson, `The Context of Scientific Achievement: Sex Status, Organizational Environments, and the Timing of Publication on Scholarship Outcomes' , Social Forces80/4 (June): 1253-1281 .
54.
Keller (1985) Evelyn Fox Keller, Reflections on Gender and Science ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press ).
55.
Keller (1992) Evelyn Fox Keller, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death ( London: Routledge ).
56.
Keller & Moglen (1987) Evelyn Fox Keller and Helene Moglen, `Competition and Feminism: Conflicts for Academic Women' , Signs12/3 (Spring): 493-511 .
57.
Kimball (1989) Meredith M. Kimball, `A New Perspective on Women's Math Achievement' , Psychological Bulletin105/2: 198-214 .
58.
Knorr Cetina (1999) Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
59.
Latour (1987) Bruno Latour, Science in Action ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
60.
Law & Williams (1982) John Law and R.J. Williams, `Putting Facts Together: A Study of Scientific Persuasion' , Social Studies of Science12/4 (November): 535-558 .
61.
Levin, Stephan & Walker (1995) Sharon G. Levin, Paula E. Stephan and Mary Beth Walker, `Planck's Principle Revisited: A Note' , Social Studies of Science25/2 (May): 275-283 .
62.
Lilienfeld & Lilienfeld (1980) Abraham M. Lilienfeld and David E. Lilienfeld, Foundations of Epidemiology ( New York: Oxford University Press , 2nd edn).
63.
Long (1992) J. Scott Long, `Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity' , Social Forces71/1 (September): 159-178 .
64.
Long & Fox (1995) J. Scott Long and Mary Frank Fox, `Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism' , Annual Review of Sociology21: 45-71 .
65.
Lundberg (1929) George A. Lundberg, `The Logic of Sociology and Social Research', in George A. Lundberg, Read Bain and Nels Anderson (eds), Trends in American Sociology ( New York: Harper ): 389-425.
Max (1982) Claire E. Max, `Career Paths for Women in Physics', in Sheila M. Humphreys (ed.), Women and Minorities in Science: Strategies for Increasing Participation ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press ): 99-118.
68.
Merchant (1990 [1980]) Carolyn Merchant, The Death of Nature ( San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins [1st edn 1980]).
69.
Merton (1973 [1942]) Robert K. Merton, `The Normative Structure of Science', in R.K. Merton (ed. Norman Storer), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations ( Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press ): 267-278 [paper first published in 1942].
70.
Messeri (1988) Peter Messeri, `Age Differences in the Reception of New Scientific Theories: The Case of Plate Tectonics Theory' , Social Studies of Science18/1 (February): 91-112 .
71.
Mills (1987) James L. Mills, `Reporting Provocative Results: Can We Publish `Hot' Papers Without Getting Burned?' , Journal of the American Medical Association258 (18 December): 3428-3429 .
72.
Moyeret al. (1995) Anne Moyer, Susan Greener, John Beauvais and Peter Salovey, `Accuracy of Health Research Reported in the Popular Press: Breast Cancer and Mammography' , Health Communication7/2: 147-161 .
Niteckiet al. (1978) Matthew H. Nitecki, J.L. Lemke, Howard W. Pullman and Markes E. Johnson, `Acceptance of Plate Tectonic Theory by Geologists' , Geology6: 661-664 .
76.
Perrin (1992) C.E. Perrin, `The Chemical Revolution: Shifts in Guiding Assumptions', in Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan and Rachel Laudan (eds), Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change ( Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press ): 105-124.
77.
Phillipset al. (1991) David P. Phillips, Elliot J. Kanter, Bridget Bednarczyk and Patricia L. Tastad, `Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific Community' , New England Journal of Medicine325 (17 October): 1180-1183 .
78.
Planck (1949) Max Planck, `A Scientific Autobiography', in M. Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers [trans. F. Gaynor] ( New York: Philosophical Library ): 13-51.
79.
Ravetz (1979) Jerome R. Ravetz, Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).
80.
Reinharz (1997) Shulamit Reinharz, `Enough Already! The Pervasiveness of Warnings in Everyday Life' , Qualitative Sociology20/4 (Winter): 477-485 .
81.
Reskin (1978) Barbara F. Reskin, `Sex Differentiation and the Social Organization of Science', in Jerry Gaston (ed.), Sociology of Science ( San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass ): 6-37.
82.
Ridgeway & Smith-Lovin (1999) Cecilia L. Ridgeway and Lynn Smith-Lovin, `Gender and Interaction', in Chafetz (1999): 247-274.
83.
Rier (1999) David A. Rier, `The Versatile `Caveat' Section of an Epidemiology Paper: Managing Public and Private Risk' , Science Communication21/1 (September): 3-37 .
84.
Rier (forthcoming) David A. Rier, `Work Setting, Publication, and Scientific Responsibility' , Science Communication.
85.
Rossiter (1987 [1978]) Margaret W. Rossiter, `Sexual Segregation in the Sciences: Some Data and a Model', in Harding & O'Barr (1987): 35-40 [paper first published in 1978].
Schiebinger (1999) Londa Schiebinger, Has Feminism Changed Science? ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
88.
Schneider (1986) Stephen H. Schneider, `Both Sides of the Fence: The Scientist as Source and Author', in Friedman, Dunwoody & Rogers (1986): 215-222.
89.
Seymour & Hewitt (1997) Elaine Seymour and Nancy M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press ).
90.
Shell (1998) Ellen R. Shell, `The Hippocratic Wars' , New York Times Magazine (28 June): 34-38 .
91.
Shlafer (1982) Marshal Shlafer, `Aspirin and Alcohol' [Letter] , New England Journal of Medicine307 (7 October): 951 .
92.
Simon & Hersh (2002) Jacqueline Simon and Melissa Hersh, `An Educational Imperative: The Role of Ethical Codes and Normative Prohibitions in CBW-Applicable Research' , Minerva40/1 (Spring): 37-55 .
93.
Singer & Endreny (1993) Eleanor Singer and Phyllis M. Endreny, Reporting on Risk ( New York: Russell Sage ).
94.
Skolbekken (1995) John-Arne Skolbekken, `The Risk Epidemic in Medical Journals' , Social Science & Medicine40/3: 291-305 .
95.
Sonnert (1995) Gerhard Sonnert, `What Makes a Good Scientist?: Determinants of Peer Evaluation among Biologists' , Social Studies of Science25/1 (February): 35-55 .
96.
Sonnert & Holton (1995a) Gerhard Sonnert and Gerald Holton, Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study ( New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press ).
97.
Sonnert & Holton (1995b) Gerhard Sonnert and Gerald Holton, Who Succeeds in Science?: The Gender Dimension ( New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press ).
98.
Stewart (1986) John A. Stewart, `Drifting Continents and Colliding Interests: A Quantitative Application of the Interests Perspective' , Social Studies of Science16/2 (May): 261-279 .
99.
Stewart (1987) John A. Stewart, `Drifting or Colliding Interests? A Reply to Laudan with Some New Results' , Social Studies of Science17/2 (May): 321-331 .
100.
Stewart (1990) John A. Stewart, Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press ).
101.
Stockard (1999) Jean Stockard, `Gender Socialization', in Chafetz (1999): 215-227.
102.
Streitmatter (1997) Janice Streitmatter, `An Exploratory Study of Risk-Taking and Attitudes in a Girls-Only Middle School Math Class' , The Elementary School Journal98/1 (September): 15-26 .
103.
Traweek (1988) Sharon Traweek, Beamtimes and Lifetimes ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).
104.
Valian (1998) Virginia Valian, Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ).
Wasserman (2000) Elga Wasserman, The Door in the Dream: Conversations with Eminent Women in Science ( Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press ).
107.
Wettersten (1985) John Wettersten, `On Conservative and Adventurous Styles of Scientific Research' , Minerva23/4 (Winter): 443-463 .
108.
Wexler (1992) Nancy Wexler, `Clairvoyance and Caution: Repercussions from the Human Genome Project', in Daniel J. Kevles and Leroy Hood (eds), Code of Codes ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ): 211-243.
Wiley & Crittenden (1992) Mary G. Wiley and Kathleen S. Crittenden, `By Your Attributions You Shall Be Known: Consequences of Attributional Accounts for Professional and Gender Identities' , Sex Roles27/5-6: 259-276 .
111.
Williams (1984) Gareth Williams, `The Genesis of Chronic Illness: Narrative Reconstruction' , Sociology of Health & Illness6/2: 175-200 .
112.
Xie & Shauman (1998) Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman, `Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle' , American Sociological Review63/6 (December): 847-870 .
113.
Ziman (1998) John Ziman, `Why Must Scientists Become More Ethically Sensitive Than They Used to Be?' , Science282 (4 December): 1813-1814 .
114.
Zuckerman, Cole & Bruer (1991) Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan R. Cole and John T. Bruer (eds), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press ).
115.
Zuckerman & Cole (1975) Harriet Zuckerman and Jonathan R. Cole, `Women in American Science' , Minerva13/1 (Spring): 82-102 .
116.
Zuckerman & Merton (1972) Harriet Zuckerman and Robert K. Merton, `Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science', in Matilda White Riley, Marilyn E. Johnson and Anne Foner (eds), A Theory of Age Stratification [Aging in Society, Vol. III] ( New York: Russell Sage ): 292-356.
