References at the end of journal articles are typically printed in one of three or four major referencing styles, together with hundreds of different ways of presenting the elements within the references themselves. This paper suggests that greater clarity could be achieved by choosing between one of two major referencing styles, and using an agreed setting for the elements within both of them.
American Psychological Association
(2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th edn). American Psychological Association: Washington, District of Columbia.
2.
ANSI
(1978). American National Standard for Bibliographic References. American National Standards Institute: New York.
3.
Bazerman, C.
(1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361–387.
4.
Bazerman, C.
(1987). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, Wisconsin.
5.
BSI
(1989). British Standard Recommendations for References to Published Materials (BS 1629). British Standards Institution: London.
6.
Connors, R. J.
(1999). The rhetoric of citation systems – Part II: Competing epistemic values in citation. Rhetoric Review, 17, (2) 219–236.
7.
Curry, M. R.
(1991). On the possibility of ethics in geography: Writing, citing and the construction of intellectual property. Progress in Human Geography, 15, (2) 125–147.
8.
Ebel, H. F.
(1995). The ultimate weapon: More about reference formats. European Science Editing, No. 54 (February) 21–22.
9.
EndNote... Bibliographies Made Easy. (1998). Niles Software, Inc.: Berkeley, CA.
10.
Franks, L. M.
(1993). So you want to start a journal (or two)?European Science Editing, No. 49(May) 3–4.
11.
Garfield, E.
(1968). Numerical versus alphabetic order for cited references. New Scientist, 39, (614) 565–566 (September 12th).
12.
Garfield, E.
(1974–76a). Why initials instead of first names in ISI’s indexes?Essays of an Information Scientist, 2, 323–324.
13.
Garfield, E.
(1974–76b). Uniformity of editorial policy on titles in citations will aid referees, librarians and authors. Essays of an Information Scientist, 2, 229–230.
14.
Grafton, A.
(1997). The Footnote: A Curious History. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15.
Gregory, D.
(1990). Editorial. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, (1) 1–6.
16.
Hartley, J.
(1981). Sequencing the elements in references. Applied Ergonomics, 12, (1) 7–12.
17.
Hartley, J.
, Trueman, M. & Burnhill, P. (1979). The role of spatial and typographic cues in the layout of journal references. Applied Ergonomics, 10, 165–169.
18.
Hendricks, M.
& Quinn, L. (2000). Teaching referencing as an introduction to epistemological empowerment. Teaching in Higher Education, 5, (4) 447–457.
19.
Hunt, R.
(1992). Editorial. Annals of Botany, 70, 1–2.
20.
Hunt, R.
(1994). Bibliographic references: Too many variations on a theme?European Science Editing, No. 52(July) 7–8.
21.
ISO
(1987). Documentation – Bibliographic References – Content, Form and Structure (ISO 690). International Standards Organization: Geneva.
22.
Modern Languages Association
(1999). MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers(5th edn). Modern Languages Association of America: New York.
23.
O’Connor, M.
(1992). With references to references. European Science Editing, No. 47 (September) 4–6.
24.
Polderman, A. K. S.
(1993). So you want a numerical reference list?European Science Editing, No. 50(September) 18–19.
25.
Poulton, E. C.
, Warren, T. H. & Bond, J. (1970). Ergonomics in journal design. Ergonomics, 1, (4) 207–209.
26.
Procite (1999). Research Information Systems: Carlsbad, California.
27.
Reference Manager (2002). Research Information Systems: Carlsbad, California.
28.
Shaw, J. G.
(2001). Full journal titles to be given for citations. European Science Editing. European Science Editing, 27, (1) 3–3.
29.
Slomanson, W. R.
(1987). The bottom line: Footnote logic in law review writing. Legal References Services Quarterly, 7, (1) 47–69.
30.
Van Loon, A. J.
(1994). No, I don’t want a numerical reference list!European Science Editing, No. 51(January) 15–16.
31.
Vipond, D.
(1996). Problems with a monolithic APA style. American Psychologist, 51, (6) 653–653.
32.
Waller, R. H. W.
(1981–82). Journal typography in transition. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 3, 335–350.
