Gender inequality in science is common to most nations. To a large extent, this inequality is a product of the socio-cultural environment in which science is conducted. The professional environment and the socio-cultural context are inextricably linked together in the practice of science. This Note analyses the perceptions of women academic scientists in India regarding the work and social environment, and the nature of problems faced by them. A triangulation of questionnaire and interview methods was employed to develop a holistic picture. The findings show that women academic scientists are influenced by the prevailing sociocultural system. Thus, ‘patrifocal’ ideology prevails at the workplace and in the family. Women face gender-related difficulties at work, and also shoulder a dual burden resulting in stress. These problems have significant consequences for the career of women academic scientists.
Begum & Balaraman (1975)Roshan J. Begum and Kamala Balaraman, ‘Contemporary Social Problems of Women Engineers and Scientists in India’ (paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Women Scientists and Engineers, Poland).
2.
Carrier (1995)Sylvie Carrier, ‘Family Status and Career Situation for Professional Women’, Work, Employment and Society9/2 (June): 343–358.
3.
Chakravarthy (1986)Radha Chakravarthy, ‘Productivity of Indian Women Scientists’, Productivity27/3 (October–December): 259–269.
4.
Chanana (2000)Karuna Chanana, ‘Treading the Hallowed Halls: Women in Higher Education’, Economic and Political Weekly35/12 (18 March): 1012–1022.
5.
Chanana (2001)Karuna Chanana, ‘Hinduism and Female Sexuality: Social Control and Education of Girls in India’, Sociological Bulletin50/1 (March): 37–63.
6.
Etzkowitz et al. (1994)Henry Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor, Michael Neuschtz, Brian Uzzi and Joseph Alonzo, ‘The Paradox of Critical Mass for Women in Science’, Science266 (7 October): 51–54.
7.
Etzkowitz, Kemelgor & Uzzi (2000)Henry Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor and Brian Uzzi, Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
8.
Evetts (1994)Julia Evetts, ‘Work and Career in Engineering: Continuity and Change in the Organization’, Work, Employment and Society8/1 (March): 101–112.
9.
Government of India (2000)Government of India, The Time Use Survey(New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation).
10.
Gurnani & Sheth (1984)Shantoo Gurnani and Madhuri Sheth, ‘Women Scientists in India: Their Position and Role’, Interdisciplinary Science Review9/3 (Autumn): 259–270.
11.
Hirsch & Rapkin (1986)Barton J. Hirsch and Bruce D. Rapkin, ‘Multiple Roles, Social Networks and Women’s Well-Being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51/6 (June): 1237–1247.
12.
Hochschild & MacHung (1989)Arlie Hochschild and Anne MacHung, The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home(New York: Viking Penguin).
13.
Jaiswal (1993)Rajendra Prasad Jaiswal, Professional Status of Women: A Comparative Study of Women in Science and Technology(Jaipur: Rawat Publications).
14.
James (1997)Jacquelyn B. James, ‘What Are the Social Issues Involved in Focussing on Differencein the Study of Gender?’, Journal of Social Issues53/2 (Summer): 213–232.
15.
Krishnaraj (1991)Maithreyi Krishnaraj, Women and Science: Selected Essays(Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House).
16.
Kumar (2001)Neelam Kumar, ‘Gender Stratification in Science: An Empirical Study in the Indian Setting’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies8/1 (January–June): 51–67.
17.
Mukhopadhyay (1994)Carol Chapnick Mukhopadhyay, ‘Family Structure and Indian Women’s Participation in Science and Engineering’, in Mukhopadhyay & Seymour (1994b): 103–132.
18.
Mukhopadhyay & Seymour (1994a)Carol Chapnik Mukhopadhyay and Susan Seymour, ‘Introduction and Theoretical Overview’, in Mukhopadhyay & Seymour (1994b): 1–33.
19.
Mukhopadhyay & Seymour (1994b)Carol Chapnik Mukhopadhyay and Susan Seymour (eds), Women, Education and Family Structure in India(Boulder, CO.: Westview Press).
20.
Pattatucci (1998)Angela M. Pattatucci (ed.), Women in Science: Meeting Career Challenges (New Delhi: Sage Publications).
21.
Research & Development Statistics (1996–97)Research and Development Statistics(New Delhi: Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India). Available at: www.IndiaEducationstat.com
22.
Reskin (1978)Barbara F. Reskin, ‘Sex Differentiation and the Social Organization of Science’, in Jerry Gaston (ed.), The Sociology of Science(San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass): 6–37.
23.
Rout, Lewis & Kagan (1999)Usha Rani Rout, Sue Lewis and Carolyn Kagan, ‘Work and Family Roles: Indian Women in India and the West’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies6/1 (January–June): 91–104.
24.
Subrahmanyan (1998)Lalita Subrahmanyan, Women Scientists in the Third World: The Indian Experience(New Delhi: Sage Publications).
25.
White (1973)Martha S. White, ‘Psychological and Social Barriers to Women in Science’, in Bernice T. Eiduson and Linda Beckman (eds), Science As a Career Choice: Theoretical and Empirical Studies(New York: Russell Sage Foundation): 574–586.
