British Venture Capital Association Reports on Investment Activity 1984–1991 cited in: MurrayG. and LotJ.‘Have UK Venture Capital Firms a bias against investment in new technology based firms?’, Working Paper, University of Warwick Business School, 1993.
2.
Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Finance for growth: Meeting the financial needs of small and medium enterprises, report of CBI Smaller Firms Council, 1993.
3.
HughesA. and StoreyD.‘Introduction’, in Hughes, A., Storey, D., (eds).
4.
‘Introduction’,
5.
‘Introduction’,
6.
StoreyD., Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge: London, 1994.
7.
HayM. and AbbottS.Investing for the Future; Promoting seed, startup and early stage venture capital funding of new technology based firms in the UK, Consultants Report, Advent Ltd, 1993.
8.
CRL (Company Reports Ltd.), R & D Scoreboard, Consultants report commissioned by the Department of Trade and Industry, 1994.
9.
FergusonC., ‘Computers and the coming of the US Keiretsu’, Harvard Business Review, July August 1990, pp. 55-70, 1990.
10.
FloridaR. and KenneyM.The Breakthrough Illusion; Corporate America's Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production, Basic Books: NY, 1990.
11.
FloridaR. and KenneyM.Beyond Mass Production, Oxford University Press, 1993.
12.
SaxenianA., Regional Advantage, Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press: Cambridge Mass., 1994.
13.
GarnseyE. and HerriotW.‘Overcoming the Liabilities of Newness; new venture support in a high technology innovation centre’, Proceedings of the TCD Technology Transfer and Innovation Conference, London, July 1994.
14.
GarnseyE., Galloway,S, and MathisenS.‘Flexibility and Specialisation in Question: birth, growth and death rates of Cambridge new technology based firms 1988–1992’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Jan-Mar. 1994.
15.
WestheadP. and StoreyD.An Assessment of Firms Located on and off Science Parks in the United Kingdom, HMSO, 1994
16.
CoshA. and HughesA.‘Size, financial structure and profitability: UK companies in the 1980s’, in Hughes and Storey (eds). 1994.
17.
GarnseyE. and Cannon-BrookesA.‘The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5, pp. 179-207, 1993.
18.
CoshA. and HughesA.op. cit.
19.
British Venture Capital Association Reports on Investment Activity1984-1991, op. cit.
20.
CRL (Company Reports Ltd.), op.cit.
21.
HayM. and AbbottS.op. cit.
22.
Financial Times, 24.8.94.
23.
FellerI., ‘American State Governments as Models for National Science Policy’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, Spring 1992.
24.
Confederation of British Industry (CBI), op. cit.
25.
CoshA. and HughesA.op. cit.
26.
HayM. and AbbottS.op. cit.
27.
ShahS. and GarnseyE.‘The Acquisition of High Technology Firms; evidence from Cambridge’, Cambridge Research Papers in Management Studies, Oct. 1993.
28.
FergusonC., op. cit.
29.
FloridaR. and KenneyM.op. cit [10].
30.
GarnseyE. and MooreI., ‘Pre-competitive and Near-market Research and Development: Problems for Policy’, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 8, No. 5/6, pp. 69-83, 1993.
31.
HughesA., ‘The problems of finance for smaller business’, Small Firms Research Centre Working Paper No 15, University of Cambridge, 1992.
32.
FransmanM., The Market and Beyond; co-operation and competition in information technology development in the Japanese system, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
33.
ButchartR., ‘A new UK definition of the high technology industries’, Economic Review, 400, pp. 82-8, 1987.
34.
Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge, The State of British Enterprise, 1992.
35.
PavittK.RobsonM.TownsendJ., ‘The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK 1945–1983’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 3, pp. 297-316, 1987.
36.
MooreB., ‘Financial constraints to the growth and development of small high-technology firms’, in Hughes,A., and Storey,D. (eds.), Finance and the Small Firm, Routledge: London, 1994.
37.
GarnseyE.WilkinsonM., ‘Global Alliance in High Technology; a Trap for the Unwary’, Long Range Planning, Vol. 27, No 5, pp. 137-146, 1995.
38.
LazonickW., ‘Controlling the Market for Corporate Control: the Historical Significance of Managerial Capitalism’, Industrial Corporate Change, pp. 445-486, 1992.
39.
McCauleyR.ZimmerS., ‘Explaining international differences in the cost of capital’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Summer 1989.
40.
GarnseyE.AlfordH. and RobertsJ.‘Acquisition and the Integration of New Ventures; Technology and Culture’, in Marceau,J. (ed.), Reworking the World, De Gruyter; Amsterdam, 1992.
41.
WilliamsonO., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press: New York, 1975.
42.
WilliamsonO., ‘The firm as a nexus of treaties: an introduction,’ in Aoki,M., GustafssonB., and WilliamsonO. (eds.), The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties, Sage, 1990.