Blau,P. M. and Scott,W. R., Formal Organizations. A Comparative Approach, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963.
2.
ParsonsT., The Social System, Free Press/Collier-MacMillan, New York/London, 1964.
3.
Kerr,C., Dunlop,J. T., Harbison,F. H. and Myers,C. A., Industrialism and Industrial Man, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973.
4.
RobertsK. H., “On looking at an elephant: An evaluation of cross-cultural research related to organisations”, in Weinshall,T. D., op. cit., 1977, pp. 56–104.
5.
AshbyW. R., An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman Hall, London, 1961.
6.
Lawrence,P. R. and Lorsch,J. W., Organization and Environment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.
7.
CarlsonS., Executive Behaviour: A Study of the Workload and Working Methods of Managing Directors, Strömbergs, Stockholm, 1951; Mintzberg,H.The Nature of Managerial Work, Harper & Row, New York, 1973.
8.
WoodwardJ., Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London/New York/Toronto, 1965, p.257.
9.
HeydebrandW. V., “The study of organisations”, in Heydebrand,W. V. (ed.), Comparative Organisations. The Results of Empirical Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973, pp. 55–56.
ChildJ., “Organizational structure, environment and performance…”, op. cit., p.3.
12.
Woodward, op. cit., p.70.
13.
Woodward, op. cit., p.71.
14.
Woodward, op. cit., pp. 76–77.
15.
Woodward, op. cit., p.76.
16.
ChildJ., Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance, University of Aston Management Centre, Working Paper Series No. 4, Birmingham, 1973, p.40.
17.
ChildJ., Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance, University of Aston Management Centre, Working Paper Series No. 4, Birmingham, 1973, p. 20–21, 31–32.
18.
ChildJ., Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated with Company Performance, University of Aston Management Centre, Working Paper Series No. 4, Birmingham, 1973, pp. 20–21.
19.
Argyris,Ch., The Applicability of Organisational Sociology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1972.
20.
SahalD., Structure and Self-organization, International Institute of Management, discussion paper 78–87, Berlin, 1978, p.14.
21.
SahalD., Structure and Self-organization, International Institute of Management, discussion paper 78–87, Berlin, 1978, p.13.
22.
EleyL., Transzendentale Phänomenologie und Systemtheorie der Gesellschaft, Rombach, Freiburg i. Brsg., 1972, pp. 64–65.
23.
VansinaL. S., Beabsichtigte und unbeabsichtigte Reaktionen und Anpassungsversuche der verantwortlichen Personen, Organisationen und Institutionen, paper, First European Forum on Organisation Development, Aachen, 30.10-1.11.1978; Klein,L., Was die Sozialwissenschaften bieten, wie man es anwendet und welche Probleme sich dabei ergeben, paper, First European Forum on Organisation Development, Aachen, 30.10–1.11.1978.
24.
ForesM., “Technical change and innovation”, in Bowe,C. (ed.), Industrial Efficiency and the Role of Government, HMSO, London, 1977, pp. 101–117.
25.
MannheimK., “Die Umgestaltung des menschlichen Denkens und Handelns” in Schäfers,B. (ed.), Gesellschaftliche Planung, Enke, Stuttgart, 1973, pp. 96–100.
26.
Fores,M. and Sorge,A., The Rational Fallacy, International Institute of Management, discussion paper 78–84, Berlin, 1978.
27.
Harré,R., “Architectonic man: On the structuring of lived experience”, in Brown,R. H. and Lyman,S. M. (eds.). Structure, Consciousness, and History, Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 139–172.
28.
Maurice,M., Sorge,A. and Warner,M., “Societal differences on organizing manufacturing units: A Comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain”, Organization Studies1, 1980, pp. 59–86.
29.
CrozierM., Le phénemène bureaucratique, Seuil, Paris, 1963.
30.
Crozier,M. and Friedberg,E., L'acteur et “le système”, Presses Universitaire de France, Paris, 1977.
31.
WarnerM., “Organizational experimentation: Choice and constraint in a longer-term setting”, Management International Review, 18, 1978, pp. 15–23.
32.
WarnerM., “Organizational experimentation: Choice and constraint in a longer-term setting”, Management International Review, 18, 1978, p.16.
33.
WarnerM., “Organizational experimentation: Choice and constraint in a longer-term setting”, Management International Review, 18, 1978, p.22.
34.
WarnerM., “Organizational experimentation: Choice and constraint in a longer-term setting”, Management International Review, 18, 1978, p.18.
35.
Berger,P. L. and Luckmann,Th., The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin University Books, Harmondsworth, 1971, pp. 78–79.
36.
Fores, op. cit.; Sahal,S., Evolution of Technology: A Case Study of the Farm Tractor, International Institute of Management, discussion paper, 78–99, Berlin, 1978.
37.
Meyer,J. W. and Rowan,B., “Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology83, 1977, p.341.
38.
Meyer,J. W. and Rowan,B., “Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology83, 1977, p.352.
39.
Meyer,J. W. and Rowan,B., “Institutionalized organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology83, 1977, p.341.
40.
MauriceM., “Theoretical and ideological aspects of universalism in the study of work organizations”, in Haug,M. R. and Dofny,J. (eds.), Work and Technology, Sage Studies in International Sociology, Beverly Hills, 1977, pp. 27–33; Maurice,M., Sellier,J.-J. and Silvestre,F., “La production de la hiérarchie dans I'enterprise: Recherche d'un effet sociétal. Comparaison France-Allemagne”, Revue francaise de sociologie 30, 1979, pp. 331–365.
41.
HageJ., “Choosing constraints and constraining choice”, in Warner,M. (ed.), Organizational Choice and Constraint: Approaches to the Sociology of Enterprise Behaviour, Saxon House-Teakfield, Farnborough, 1977, pp. 1–56.
