WarnerMalcolm, “Organizational Alternatives: Towards an Analysis of Experimental Processes”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 16 No. 3, October 1979, pp.355–367.
2.
WeickKarl E., The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
3.
WeickKarl E., op. cit., 19.
4.
As used by EvansWilliam M., Organizational Experiments: Laboratory and Field Research, New York: Harper & Row, 1971, 2.
5.
EvanWilliam M., op. cit., 1.
6.
RoseMichael, Industrial Behaviour: Theoretical Development Since Taylor, London: Allen Lane, 1975.
7.
See WarnerMalcolm, “Organizational Experiments & Social Innovations”, in NystromPaul C. and StarbuckWilliam H. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, to appear.
8.
For example, MansfieldEdwin, “Technological Change and the Rate of Imitation”, Econometrica, Vol. 29 No. 4, Autumn 1961, pp.741–766; and KimberlyJohn R., “Managerial Innovation”, in NystromPaul C. and StarbruckWilliam H. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, to appear.
9.
See ClarkPeter, Organizational Design, London: Tavistock, 1972.
10.
SeashoreStanley E., “Field Experiments with Formal Organizations”, Human Organisation, Vol. 23, Summer 1964, pp.164–170.
11.
BarnesLouis B., “Organizational Change and Field Experiment Methods”, in VroomVictor H. (ed.), Methods of Organizational Research, Pittsburgh: University Press, 1987, pp.77–111.
12.
FrenchJohn, P. R.Jnr., ‘Experiments in Field Settings’, in FestingerLeon and KatzDaniel (eds.), Research Methods in the Behaviour Sciences, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1953, pp.98–135.
13.
WeickKarl E., op. cit., 21.
14.
E.g. ScottWilliam R., “Fields Methods in the Study of Organizations”, in MarchJames G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp.261–304; and Seashore, Stanley E., op. cit.
15.
WeickKarl E., “Systematic Observational Methods”, in LindzeyG. and AronsonE. (eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
16.
E.g. WeickKarl E., “Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations”, in MarchJ. G. (ed.). Handbook of Organization, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp.194–260; and WeickKarl E., “Organizations in the Laboratory”, in VroomV. H. (ed.), Methods of Organizational Research, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967, pp.1–56.
17.
E.g. Abt Associates, Survey of the State of the Art: Social, Political and Economic Models and Simulations, Cambridge, Mass: Abt Associates Inc., 1965; and DrabekT. E. and HaasJ. E., “Realism in Laboratory Simulation: Myth or Method?”, Social Forces, Vol. 45 No. 3, Summer 1967, pp.337–346; and GuetzkowH., “Joining Field and Laboratory Work in Disaster Research”, in BakerW. G. and ChapmanD. W. (eds.), Man and Society in Disaster, New York: Basic Books, 1962, pp.337–355; and GuetzkowH., “Some Correspondences Between Simulations and ‘Realities’ in International Relations”, in KaplanM. (ed.), New Approaches to International Relations, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1968.
18.
QuinnRobert P. and KahnRobert L., “Organizational Psychology”, in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 18, 1967, pp.436–466.
19.
CampbellDonald T., “Administrative Experimentation, Institutional Records and Non-reactive Measures”, in StanleyJ. S. and ElamS. M. (eds.), Improving Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967, p. 460.
20.
See EasthopeGary, History of Social Research Methods, London: Longmans, 1974.
21.
TengSsa-ya, “Chinese Influence on the Western Examination System”, in BishopJohn L. (ed.), Studies of Governmental Institutions in Chinese History, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968, p. 231.
22.
TengSsa-ya, op. cit., p. 233.
23.
TengSsa-ya, op. cit., p. 235.
24.
TengSsa-ya, op. cit., p. 232.
25.
TaylorFrederick, W., The Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1911.
26.
TaylorFrederick W., op. cit., p. 120.
27.
For example, BlumbergPaul, Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation, London: Constable, 1968; and WalkerKenneth F., “Workers' Participation in Management: Problems, Practice and Prospect”, IILS Bulletin, No. 10, Geneva: ILO, 1974, pp.3–35.
28.
WalkerKenneth F., op. cit., 19.
29.
SherifMuzapher, The Psychology of Social Norms, New York: Harper & Row, 1936.
30.
LewinKurt, LippittR. and WhiteR. K., “Patterns of Aggressive Behaviour in Experimentally Created Social Climates”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 10 No. 3, Summer 1939, pp.271–299.
BavelasAlex and BarrettDermot, “An Experimental Approach to Organizational Communication”, Personnel, Vol. 27 No. 3, May 1951, pp.366–371.
34.
LeavittHarold J., “Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp.38–50.
35.
See, for example, WeickKarl E., “Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations”, in MarchJ. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, and WeickKarl E., “Organizations in the Laboratory”, in VroomV. H. (ed.), Methods of Organizational Research, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967.
36.
For example, BlumbergPaul, op. cit.; and CareyA., “The Hawthorne Studies: A Radical Criticism”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, June 1967, pp.403–416.
37.
BlumbergPaul, op. cit., 14.
38.
BlumbergPaul, op. cit., 15.
39.
BlumbergPaul, op. cit., 44.
40.
ArgyleMichael, “The Relay Assembly Test Room in Retrospect”, Occupational Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 1, Spring 1953, pp.98–103.
41.
CareyA., op. cit.
42.
WeickKarl E., op. cit., 20.
43.
LowinA. and CraigJ. R., “The Influence of Level of Performance on Managerial Style: An Experimental Object-Lesson in the Ambiguity of Correlation Data”, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, Vol. 3 No. 4, Autumn 1968, pp.440–458.
44.
MayoElton, Political Problems of an Industrial Civilisation, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School, 1946; WhiteheadT. N., Leadership in a Free Society, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1936; and RoethlisbergerF. J. and DicksonWilliam J., Management and the Worker, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1939.
45.
BlumbergPaul, op. cit., 44.
46.
RoseMichael, op. cit., 128.
47.
LawlerEdward E. III, Motivation in Work Organizations, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
48.
RichardsonF. L. W. Jnr. and WalkerCharles R., Human Relations in an Expanding Company, New Haven, Conn: Yale University Labor and Management Centre, 1948, 1.
49.
EvanWilliam M., op. cit., 1.
50.
BravermanHarry, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, London: Monthly Review Press, 1974.
51.
CookT. D. and CampbellD. T., “The Design of True Experiments and Quasi-Experiments in Field Settings”, in (ed.) DunnetteM. S., Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally Press, 1975.
52.
EvanWilliam M., op. cit.
53.
EvanWilliam M., op. cit., 147.
54.
See JacquesElliot, The Changing Culture of a Factory, London: Tavistock, 1951.
55.
RoseMichael, op. cit., 177.
56.
DaleErnest, The Great Organizers, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960; and Pollard, Sidney, The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1965.
57.
PughDerek S., HicksonD. J., HiningsC. R. and TurnerC., “The Context of Organization Structures”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 1, Spring 1968, pp.91–114.
58.
PerrowCharles, “Control and Bureaucracy”, a paper given to the Dubrovnik Seminar on Decision-Making, Yugoslavia, January 1975.
59.
See HellerFrank A., Managerial Skills and Decision-Making: A Technical Report to the SSRC, London: Tavistock Institute, 1975; and WoodS., “A Reappraisal of the Contingency Approach to Organization”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 16 No. 3, October 1980, pp.334–354.
60.
HellerFrank A., op. cit., 10.
61.
See WarnerMalcolm, “Organizational Experiments & Social Innovations”, in NystromPaul C. and StarbuckWilliam H. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, to appear.