There is a growing body of literature citing a litany of sins of omission and commission on the part of the multinational corporations as well as defending and promoting the positive contributions made by these corporations in the world's economic growth and human well being. Some selected references are: Ball (1975), Barnet and Mueller (1974). Behrman (1970), Dunning (1971), Heller and Norris (1975), Jacoby (1974), Kindleberger (1970), Ledogar (1975), Levitt (1970), McCloy (1976), Sampson (1973, 1975), Sethi and Holton (1974), Sheer (1974), Stephenson (1973), Tugendhat (1973), U.S. Senate (1973), the United Nations (1973), Vernon (1971), and the International Chamber of Commerce (1974).
2.
See, for example, Behrman, Boddewyn, and Kapoor (1975), Business International (1975, 1976), Council of the Americas (1976), and the International Advertising Association (1975).
3.
“America's Growing Antibusiness Mood”, Business Week, 17 June 1972, pp. 100–103.
4.
Gallup, George, “Senators, Congressmen Receive Low Ratings on ‘Ethical Standards’ ”, The Gallup Poll, press release, 22 August 1976, copyright 1976, Field Enterprises, Chicago.
5.
Gallup, George, “Big Business Has Black Eye With the Public”, The Gallup Poll, press release, 13 July 1975, copyright 1975, Field Enterprises, Chicago.
6.
“Why Business Has a Black Eye”, U.S. News and World Report, 6 September 1976, pp. 22–25; “America Speaks Out”, U.S. News and World Report, 13 September 1976, pp. 39-41.
7.
“Multinationals: The Public Gives Them Low Marks”,Business Week, 9 June 1973, pp. 42, 44.
8.
Landell Mills Associates, The Attitudes of European “Influentials” Towards Multinationals,London, 1975.
9.
Salinger, Pierre, “Multinationals in a Changing Europe”, Profile, Brussels, Belgium, ITT-Europe, Spring1976, pp. 9–10.
10.
“How ITT Solved Its Own Communication Riddle”, Advertising and Marketing, Autumn 1975, p. 2.
11.
For case studies of various European advocacy campaigns see International Advertising Association,Controversy Advertising,New York: Hastings House, 1977. Other recent campaigns include Imperial Chemical Industries (U.K.); Henkel; Hoechst (West Germany); Tylo Batsu (Sweden); and G.B. Enterprises (Belgium).
12.
Sethi. Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations,1977, pp. 257–288.
13.
Sethi. Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations,1977, pp. 257–288.
14.
Carmody, Deirdre, “Reporters Chided on Business News”, The New York Times, 5 May 1976, p. 38.
15.
“Corporate Soapboxes: Companies Use Annual Reports to Make a Point”, The Wall Street Journal, 1 April 1976, p. 1.
16.
BrownTerry P., “Profit-Minded Chief at Bendix Tries to Set a Businessmen's Code”, The Wall Street Journal, 18 November 1975, p. 1.
17.
SchlesingerArthurJr.,“Government, Business, and Morality”, The Wall Street Journal, 1 June 1976, p. 16.
18.
SchlesingerArthurJr.,“Government, Business, and Morality”, The Wall Street Journal, 1 June 1976, p. 10.
19.
“America's Growing Antibusiness Mood”, Business Week, 17 June 1972, pp. 100–103.
20.
BallGeorge W. (ed.), Global Companies: The Political Economy of World Business,Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1975.
21.
BarnetSylvan M.Jr., “A Global Look at Advocacy Advertising”, Public Relations Journal, November 1975, pp. 17–21.
22.
BehrmanJack, National Interests and the Multinational Enterprise: Tensions Among the North Atlantic Countries,Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970.
23.
BehrmanJack, BoddewynJ. J. and KapoorAshok, International Business-Government Communications,Lexington, Mass., D. C. Heath & Co., 1975.
24.
BrownTerry P., “Profit Minded Chief at Bendix Tries To Set a Businessmen's Code”, Wall Street Journal, 18 November 1975, p. 1.
25.
Business International, Corporate External Affairs: Blueprint for Survival – A Business International European Research Report, New York, Business International, 1975.
26.
Business International, Corporate External Affairs: The Transnational Problems, New York, Business International, 1976.
27.
CarmodyDeirdre, “Reporters Chided on Business News”, New York Times, 5 May 1976, p. 38.
28.
“Corporate Soapboxes: Companies Use Annual Reports To Make a Point”, Wall Street Journal, 1 April 1976, p. 1.
29.
Council of the Americas, Communicating the Socioeconomic Impact of Multinational Corporations in Developing Countries, New York: Council of the Americas, 1976.
30.
DunningJohn M. (ed.), The Multinational Enterprise, New York, Praeger, 1971.
31.
GallupGeorge, “Big Business Has Black Eye with the Public”, The Gallup Poll, press release, 13 July 1975, copyright 1975, Field Enterprises, Chicago.
32.
GallupGeorge, “Senators, Congressmen Receive Low Ratings on ‘Ethical Standards’ ”, The Gallup Poll, press release, 22 August 1976, copyright 1976, Field Enterprises, Chicago.
33.
HellerRobert and WillattNorris, The European Revenge,New York, Charles Scribner's, 1975.
34.
“How ITT Solved Its Own Corporate Communications Riddle”, Advertising and Marketing, Autumn 1975, p. 2.
35.
International Advertising Association, Controversy Advertising, New York, Hastings House, 1977.
36.
International Advertising Association, Multinationals in Confrontation: How Can Better Communication Help Meet This Crisis,Geneva, Switzerland, International Advertising Association, 1975.
KindlebergerCharles (ed.), The Multinational Corporation,Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1970.
39.
Landell Mills Associates, The Attitudes of European “Influentials” Towards Multinationals, London, 1975.
40.
LedogarRobert J., Hungry for Profits: U.S. Food and Drug Multinationals in Latin America, New York: IDOC/North America, Inc., 1975.
41.
LevittKari, Silent Surrender: The Multinational Corporation in Canada, Toronto, Canada, MacMillan of Canada, 1970.
42.
McCloyJohn J., The Great Oil Spill, New York, Chelsea House Publishers, 1976.
43.
“Multinationals: The Public Gives Them Low Marks”, Business Week, 9 June 1973, pp. 42, 44.
44.
SalingerPierre, “Multinationals in a Changing Europe”, Profile, Brussels, Belgium, ITT-Europe, Spring1976, pp. 9–10.
45.
SampsonAnthony, The Sovereign State of ITT, New York, Stein & Day, 1973.
46.
SchlesingerArthurJr., “Government, Business, and Morality”, Wall Street Journal, 1 June 1976, p. 16.
47.
SethiS. Prakash, Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations: Social Conflict, Big Business Image, the News Media, and Public Policy,Lexington, Mass., D. C. Heath and Co., 1977.
48.
SethiS. Prakash and HoltonR. H. (eds.), Management of the Multinationals: Policies, Operations, and Research, New York, The Free Press, 1974.
49.
SheerRobert, America After Nixon: The Age of the Multinationals, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1974.
50.
StephensonHugh, The Coming Clash, London, Widen-field & Nichelson, 1973.
51.
TugendhatC.The Multinationals, New York, Random House, 1972.
52.
United Nations, Multinational Corporations in World Development, No. ST/ECA, 190, New York, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 1973.
53.
U.S. Senate, Implications of Multinational Firms for World Trade and Investment and for U.S. Trade and Labor, Committee on Finance, 93rd Congress, 1st Session, February 1973.
54.
VernonRaymond, Sovereignty at Bay, New York, Basic Books, 1971.
55.
“Why Business Has a Black Eye”, U.S. News and World Report, 6 September 1973, pp. 22–25.